Robert Vazquez-Pacheco: An Oral History of ACT UP
Robert Vazquez-Pacheco Interview - December 14, 2002
Introduction
- Interview with Robert Vazquez-Pacheco by Sarah Schulman on December 14th, 2002.
- Robert is 46 years old and lives in Harlem at 327 St. Nicholas Avenue.
Early Experiences with AIDS
- First heard the word "AIDS" possibly in 1981.
- Remembers reading a New York Times article about five men in San Francisco with the illness, while at Jones Beach with his boyfriend, Jeff.
- At that time, Robert was 24 or 25, living with Jeff on the Upper West Side, and working for a lighting design company.
- Jeff was diagnosed with Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) in September 1981, about three months after the article.
Initial Reactions and Diagnosis
- Early stories about the illness were vague, with some people dismissing it as something affecting “sluts in San Francisco.”
- Jeff's diagnosis was September 9th, 1981, his thirtieth birthday.
- They knew something was wrong due to lesions, but not specifically what it was.
Early Treatment and Support
- Doctor informed them it was cancer, which later became known as GRID and then AIDS.
- Jeff and Robert had been together for six months before the diagnosis.
- Jeff's initial question to Robert was whether he wanted to end the relationship.
- Jeff received chemo and continued working despite his illness, living in a fifth-floor walk-up on the Upper West Side.
- In the early 1980s, they didn't know many others with AIDS and there were no support groups available.
- No treatment information was readily available; Jeff relied solely on his doctor.
- GMHC (Gay Men's Health Crisis) was contacted but did not respond.
Personal Concerns and Support System
- Robert assumed he was infected, noticing swollen lymph nodes since 1980.
- Speculates infection may have occurred in the late 1970s.
- Primary support system was family and friends.
- Jeff's family was initially unaccepting; contrasting with Robert's family who embraced Jeff.
- An example given was Robert's sister allowing Jeff to hold her baby because he was family, while Jeff’s sister did not let him near her baby.
Navigating the Hospital System
- Jeff’s family was unwilling to learn about the illness.
- Robert took it upon himself to educate his family.
- Recalls his mother-in-law cleaning their apartment in an inappropriate way with toilet paper.
- Robert assumed he was HIV-positive but did not get tested until later, focusing on caring for Jeff.
Lack of Interest in Support Groups
- Jeff did not want to participate in support groups.
- Upon Jeff’s death in 1986, Robert began to seek more engagement.
Involvement with ACT UP
- First experience with ACT UP was at their first anniversary party, a talent show.
- Initially felt like an outsider due to the in-jokes and references.
- Vito Russo was present.
- Decided to attend an ACT UP meeting with his friend David Kirschenbaum, seeking meaningful action.
- Decided to "stand where the power is," positioning themselves near key figures like Avram Finkelstein and Maria Maggenti.
- Women in leadership wasn't unusual for Robert, stemming from his experience on the Gay and Lesbian Switchboard and his matriarchal background.
Early Activism
- Moved towards activism due to anger over Jeff's death and proactive political consciousness raising.
- Recalls instances of discrimination during Jeff's hospitalizations, such as staff leaving food trays on the floor outside the room.
- First public act in ACT UP involved improving the legibility of the chalkboard notes using architectural lettering.
- Recognized as one of the few people of color in ACT UP at the time.
Majority Action Committee
- Started the Majority Action Committee with other people of color (Ortez Alderson, Robert Garcia, etc.).
- Formed due to the need to address how the epidemic affected communities of color differently.
- Ortez Alderson frequently spoke about issues affecting people of color.
- Robert ran for At-Large Representative, responsible for membership, and won.
Goals and Evolution of Majority Action
- Focused on issues affecting people of color and the unique challenges faced during the epidemic.
- Later, more people of color joined ACT UP and the Majority Action Committee.
- After Ortez’s death, it was difficult for the committee to maintain momentum.
Steering Committee (Coordinating Committee)
- Robert served on the Steering Committee (later clarified as the Coordinating Committee) along with Michelangelo Signorile, Debbie Levine, and someone from TAG.
- His focus was ensuring membership was engaged, providing introductions to new members, and ensuring members could take care of themselves.
- The committee operationalized decisions made by the membership.
- Membership opposed being "steered."
Early Actions: Seize the FDA
- Actively involved in the "Seize the FDA" action.
- Served as a marshal, helping maintain order and peace.
- Goal was to pressure the FDA to expedite the drug approval process.
- ACT UP organized teach-ins to educate people about the clinical trial process.
Clinical Trials and Compassionate Use
- Robert was not in a clinical trial at this time.
- ACT UP advocated for compassionate use, allowing access to promising drugs before widespread distribution.
- Compassionate use requires doctor application and monitoring, benefiting those with limited options.
- ACT UP is credited with winning compassionate use.
Marshaling Philosophy and Techniques
- Philosophy: to keep demonstrators safe, prevent violence, and avoid abuse by the police.
- Techniques: crowd control, acting as a buffer between police and demonstrators, leading chants, and monitoring the situation.
- Ideally, about 75 marshals would be needed for 400 demonstrators.
Emotional and Psychological Impact
- Robert felt that peacekeeping through marshaling helped him deal with his anger and served as a form of denial about his own health.
- Recalls an incident at the FDA action where he was arrested after someone broke a window.
Evolution of ACT UP and Changing Demographics
- As more people of color and women with AIDS joined, Robert transitioned out of ACT UP.
- He became the manager of the PWA Health Group around 1989.
Women's Caucus
- The Women's Caucus (including Maxine, Debbie Levine, Maria, Amy, Alexis) addressed issues like the CDC's failure to recognize certain opportunistic infections in women as AIDS-defining illnesses.
- Although accepted, women often faced a battle to get their issues discussed.
People of Color Issues
- Struggles around access and education persisted.
- ACT UP membership was largely educated about AIDS, but this information didn’t always reach communities of color.
- In communities of color, AIDS was often perceived as a disease of IV drug users.
Focus on IV Drug Users
- Keith Cylar was among those who pushed for addressing the issues of IV drug users.
- Robert started taking medication in 1995.
- Didn’t want to take AZT, knowing that clinical trials did not include people of color and that African-Americans were more susceptible to anemia when taking it
- Couldn’t say if people of color and white people had different information about medication
Social Dynamics within ACT UP
- There was a presumed intimacy in ACT UP, but many people didn't know much about others’ lives.
- Observed an abundance of attractive people, but that did not necessarily mean they were available.
- Public visibility may have deterred some from pursuing relationships with Robert.
- Relationships in ACT UP were often very public.
- Dating someone in ACT UP was all-consuming but also satisfying.
- Gregg Bordowitz and Robert dated for a while.
- Starting to work on AIDS as manager of the Health Group changed Robert's relationship with ACT UP.
PWA Health Group and Access to Medications
- Robert was paid little as the manager of the Health Group, but still considered it a form of activism.
- The Health Group operated as a buying club for unapproved drugs like Dextran Sulfate and lipids.
- Dextran Sulfate was bought from Japan with doctors' permission.
- The feeling at the time was that there were very few options, with AZT being the only approved drug.
Concerns about AZT
- Robert was hesitant to take AZT due to a lack of studies on people of color and concerns about anemia.
- Didn’t think that the medications were necessarily good
- Robert stressed the importance of access to medication for people of color and women.
Influence of ACT UP on Personal Life and Social Change
- Saw ACT UP as an opportunity for social change by addressing issues like racism, class, and sexism through the lens of AIDS.
- Believed AIDS had the potential to force changes in healthcare access, information, and medication.
- Advocated for expanded access in clinical trials.
- The CCG (Community Constituency Group) allowed community members to review clinical trial information alongside researchers.
- Tony Fauci was the head of the NIAID.
Advocacy within the ACTG
- As one of the few people of color talking about the science of treatment, Robert was invited to sit on the ACTG.
- Emphasized the importance of cultural sensitivity and appropriateness in clinical trial recruitment and materials.
- Community members needed to be part of the whole research process
- Some researchers were receptive to these suggestions, while others resisted.
- Felt the government was using this white male medical model
- Juan Ledesma, a Latino treatment advocate from LA, was supportive of the scientist
Challenges and Disconnects
- Felt his level of education was not enough to fully advocate, and was concerned about manipulation of community people.
- Felt that information was not moving to everyone and that treatment activists were very involved in finding new drugs
- Some TAG members were talking science in a way that sounded like researchers.
- Felt fortunate that he started treatment in 1995
Personal Treatment Choices
- Robert got sick in 1995, and decided to start taking medication.
- The treatment advocacy that came out of ACT UP is what has presented itself as all of the drugs that are available
- Drugs are so expensive that it makes it very difficult for people to access
Missed Opportunities
- A discussion that ACT UP didn’t engage in was about socioeconomic issues.
- People in the united states don’t want to talk about class
- Noted the high number of college-educated gay men in ACT UP.
- Robert recognizes that he helps to initiate stuff but he doesn’t stay around to make sure it stays around.
- Gay bars were called the great equalizers
Social and Sexual Dynamics Revisited
- Comfort level influences who people socialize and have sex with; for some, working and socializing with the same individuals is challenging.
- Robert thinks that it is important to talk to sex partners about being HIV-positive
- Years later, found out that people were pissed off about his being so open
Concerns Regarding Prevention
- ACT Up was always about treatment, not stopping people from getting infected
- There were people who disclosed their status, and people who did not disclose their statuses
- One reason for disclosing was to see someone who looked fairly healthy and say that they are a person with AIDS
Community-Based Work and Legacies
- Now works with Moises Agosto at the Minority Task Force, using knowledge gained from ACT UP.
- Recognizes ACT UP’s achievement in mobilizing people around a clear intention.
Housing Initiatives
- Minority Task Force provided transitional housing; Housing Works was the first organization that only did housing.
- ACT UP was considered a white organization.
Gran Fury
- Joined Gran Fury after speaking out about the lack of people of color in TAG and was invited to join the group
- Gran Fury got approached by Museo Del Barrio to do an installation on HIV and AIDS.
- Debbie Levine used to work at Creative time and said that they could get someone to do something about AIDS in El Museo Del Barrio
- Recalls meeting Tom Kalin at a conference, where he spoke out about the lack of diversity in Gran Fury.
Group Dynamics and Collaborative Art
- Robert enjoyed producing in Gran Fury and worked as the person who didn’t mind speaking publicly about projects.
- Working in a collaborative project was new to Robert and there were a lot of arguments about production
- Gran Fury was sort of in the right place at the right time
- Became art world celebrities very quickly
- Hard to maintain balance
- People did not know who the fuck Gran Fury was
- Donald Moffet and Loring had shows in Wessel O'Connor.
"Kissing Doesn't Kill: Greed and Indifference Do"
- Gran Fury created the piece "Kissing Doesn't Kill" as part of "Art Across America" to mimic a Benetton’s ad to address AIDS.
- The piece involved three couples:
- An Interracial Couple: Robert Vazquez-Pacheco and Heidi Dorow
- Two Men: Mark Simpson and Jose Fidelino
- Two Women: Julie Tolentino and Lola Flash
- The message was that greed and indifference, not kissing, caused deaths from aids.
- The piece was photographed and filmed, and the footage was used in a short video; Tom was the film director, he shot it
- The poster went up on busses in New York and Chicago
- Received defacing in Chicago
Collective Process
- Gran Fury operated as a collective, with input from all members.
- There was tension because the work was very seductive in the art world
- Recognized the group's fine line between art and activism.
- The collective was fortunate to receive funding when AIDS artwork was scarce.
Achievements and Legacies of ACT UP
- Robert thinks that ACT UP’s achievement was its ability to mobilize a group of people with a very clear intention.
- Legacy includes empowering people with knowledge and sparking subsequent activism.
- ACT UP drew inspiration from previous movements, such as the women’s health movement.
Successes and Challenges of ACT UP
- Robert thinks that success depends on what you’re looking at; some were very successful, and some wasn’t good.
- The political climate is now much more fucked up than in the beginning of ACT UP
- The kind of activism in ACT UP needs to be more sophisticated to deal with the increasing political divide.
- Robert is thinking about going back to ACT UP