Intelligence: Definitions, Theories, Testing, Biology, Environment, and Extremes
Learning Objectives
- Accurately define and differentiate various conceptions of intelligence.
- Explain the debate over whether intelligence is general (one overarching factor) or domain-specific.
- Describe psychometric principles (reliability, validity, standardization) that guide test construction.
- Recount the historical development of intelligence testing and related controversies (eugenics, cultural bias).
- Outline modern multifactor theories (Gardner, Sternberg, Ceci) and additional proposed intelligences (emotional, social, wisdom, creativity).
- Summarize biological and environmental contributions to intelligence, how these factors shape public policy, and their neural correlates.
- Describe how brain size, neuron count, processing speed, neural efficiency, entropy, and cortical maturation correlate with IQ.
- Identify the diagnostic criteria, causes, and life outcomes associated with intellectual disability and giftedness.
Foundational Questions About Intelligence
- How do we distinguish intelligence from talent?
- Is intelligence equal to wisdom? Creativity?
- How is intelligence valued across cultures and situations?
Core Definitions
- Intelligence: the capacity to learn, meet environmental demands effectively, and understand/control one’s own cognitive processes.
- Metacognition: awareness and regulation of one’s thinking; often considered a crucial component of intelligence.
Is Intelligence General or Specific?
Spearman’s Two-Factor Theory
- Used factor analysis to examine correlations among test items.
- Items that correlate highly form a cluster (shared variance).
- Proposed two sources of variance in any mental-ability task:
- g factor (general intelligence): a single, overarching ability that underlies performance on all mental tasks.
- s factors (specific abilities): unique skills tied to particular tasks (e.g., arithmetic, verbal fluency).
- Diagram in lecture showed a central g node connected to eight s nodes (S₁ – S₈).
Thurstone’s Primary Mental Abilities
- Seven relatively independent abilities:
- Verbal comprehension
- Word fluency
- Numerical skill
- Spatial ability
- Associative memory
- Perceptual speed
- Reasoning
Modern Multifactor Theories
Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences
- Rejects a single IQ; posits independent intelligences tied to specific brain regions.
- Listed intelligences:
- Linguistic
- Logical/mathematical
- Musical
- Spatial
- Bodily/kinesthetic
- Interpersonal
- Intrapersonal
- Naturalistic
- Existentialist (added later by Gardner)
Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory
- Internal / Analytic: conventional academic problem-solving; heavily sampled by IQ tests.
- External / Creative: dealing with novel tasks, generating innovative ideas.
- Experiential / Practical: adapting to, shaping, or selecting environments ("street smarts").
- Illustrated as three interacting components (Analytic ↔ Creative ↔ Practical).
Ceci’s Bioecological Model
- Intelligence emerges from an interaction among:
- Biology (innate potential)
- Environment (ecological context)
- Motivation (internal drive)
- Depicted as overlapping circles (Biology, Environment, Motivation).
Measuring Intelligence: The Psychometric Approach
- Goal: construct standardized tests that yield quantitative scores of intellectual performance.
Key Test-Construction Concepts
- Reliability: consistency of scores.
- Test–retest reliability: same person, two administrations.
- Split-half reliability: correlate performance on two halves of the same test.
- Validity: does the test measure what it claims?
- Content validity: test content represents the domain.
- Predictive validity: score forecasts future performance.
- Measured via a validity coefficient (correlation with external criterion).
- Standardization: uniform procedures for administration & scoring; creation of norms.
- Normal distribution: bell-shaped curve; most scores cluster near the mean.
- Empirical rule: 68 % within ±1 SD, 95 % within ±2 SD.
- Measures of central tendency on a normal curve:
- Mean (average)
- Median (middle score)
- Mode (most frequent)
Historical Milestones in Intelligence Testing
- Alfred Binet & Théodore Simon
- Developed language-based test to identify French children needing help.
- Introduced mental age concept.
- Lewis Terman (Stanford University)
- Adapted Binet–Simon for U.S.; created Stanford–Binet.
- Coined Intelligence Quotient (IQ): IQ = \frac{\text{mental age}}{\text{chronological age}} \times 100.
- Francis Galton
- Believed higher "psychic energy" & sensory acuity signaled genius.
- Built lab tests of reaction time, sensory discrimination; conceptually linked to eugenics.
- Eugenics Movement (dark side)
- Used IQ to judge reproductive "fitness" of immigrants & army recruits (Terman’s era).
- David Wechsler
- Noted mental-vs-chronological-age gap loses meaning in adults.
- WAIS-IVCDN: verbal, working-memory, perceptual-reasoning & processing-speed indices.
- Numerous subtests (e.g., Vocabulary: "What does repudiate mean?"; Block Design; Digit Span; Symbol Search). Designed for fairer testing of non-native English speakers.
Predictive Utility of IQ Tests
- Stanford-Binet & WAIS display high reliability and predict:
- School grades and total years of education.
- To a lesser degree: occupational prestige, income, health behaviors, longevity.
- Relationships are correlational, not causal.
Cultural Bias & Stereotypes
- Average score differences among racial/ethnic groups on traditional IQ tests.
- Potential explanations: test bias, socioeconomic factors, stereotype threat.
- Example of culturally loaded item: "Caesar is to salad as _ is to brandy" (answer: Napoleon).
- Raven’s Progressive Matrices created to reduce cultural content—focus on abstract, non-verbal reasoning.
The Flynn Effect
- Steady worldwide rise (~3 points/decade) in average IQ since early 20th century.
- Puzzling because many scholastic achievement scores have fallen, highlighting test-specific gains & environmental influences (nutrition, schooling, complexity of modern life, etc.).
Additional Proposed Intelligences
- Emotional Intelligence: perceive, use, understand, and regulate emotions; involves empathy & self-control.
- Social Intelligence: navigate social environments effectively, build relationships.
- Wisdom: make sound, morally informed judgments; seen as an outgrowth of practical intelligence.
- Creativity: generate novel, valuable ideas; fueled by intrinsic motivation, imagination, playful "game" personality.
- Lecture reminder: "Intelligence is the cognitive part of personality."
Biological & Environmental Influences
The Bell Curve (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994)
- Controversial claims:
- IQ tests validly measure intelligence.
- IQ predicts success metrics (school, job, parenting, income, crime avoidance).
- Society is sorting into a "cognitive elite" based on IQ.
- Testing should gate access to opportunities.
- IQ is largely heritable.
- Average racial/ethnic IQ gaps exist.
- Differences likely partly genetic.
Genetic Evidence
- Twin correlations: identical r \approx 0.86; fraternal r \approx 0.60.
- Heritability coefficient (h²): proportion of variance due to genes (value context-specific; rises in affluent settings, falls in deprived ones).
Environmental Evidence
- Family & home dominate early childhood outcomes.
- Culture shapes definitions & valued expressions of intelligence (e.g., hunting skill vs. academic reasoning).
- Occupation: complex jobs ↔ higher intelligence (bidirectional).
- Schooling: both consequence & cause of IQ; extended education boosts cognitive skills.
- Group differences analogy: same seeds planted in two soils → group mean differences reflect environment, not seed quality.
Enrichment Interventions
- Early, intensive, prolonged programs yield the greatest IQ gains, but mainly for children from deprived backgrounds.
- Must incorporate attitude & behavior supports to maintain benefits.
Neural Correlates of Intelligence
- Larger brain size & greater neuron count in frontal lobes correlate with higher IQ.
- Processing speed: fast sensory/motor responses (measured via EEG) predict higher scores.
- Neural efficiency hypothesis: bright brains show lower metabolic activity during easy tasks (less effort).
- Brain entropy: breadth of neural configurations accessible during problem solving—higher entropy may underlie flexibility.
- Cortical maturation: highly intelligent children exhibit prolonged thickening & later pruning of cortex, suggesting extended period of circuit refinement.
Extremes of Intelligence
Distribution
- Normal curve with mean 100; SD 15.
- Population percentages:
- \pm 1 SD (85–115): 68 %
- \pm 2 SD (70–130): 95 %
- <70: ~2.3 % (intellectual disability)
- >130: ~2.3 % (gifted)
Intellectual Disability (ID)
- General criterion: IQ <70 plus deficits in adaptive functioning.
- Mild ID (largest subgroup)
- Usually detected at school entry; often environment related; can achieve independent adult life.
- Moderate ID
- Diagnosed earlier; communicate adequately; perform semi-skilled work under supervision.
- Severe ID
- Motor & language delays; vulnerable to seizures; require close supervision; can do basic tasks in structured settings.
- Profound ID
- Noticeable at birth; require highly structured, one-on-one care.
- Down Syndrome
- Extra material on 21st chromosome; prevalence
Giftedness
- Top 1–2 % of population (>130 IQ or exceptional talent).
- Often intrinsically motivated; environmental support critical; may show domain-specific strengths (e.g., emotional vs. analytic).
- Example: Michael Kearney, who earned a bachelor’s at age 10.
Ethical, Social, & Policy Implications
- Misuse of testing (eugenics, immigration, military screening) underscores need for culturally sensitive assessment.
- Overemphasis on heredity can lead to deterministic policies; overemphasis on environment may ignore biological constraints.
- Balanced view: intelligence arises from dynamic interplay of genes, environment, motivation, and culture.
Key Equations & Statistics
- Intelligence Quotient: IQ = \frac{\text{mental age}}{\text{chronological age}} \times 100
- Twin correlations: identical r = 0.86; fraternal r = 0.60.
- Normal-curve rule: 68 % within \pm 1 SD, 95 % within \pm 2 SD.
Study Tips
- Relate theories (Spearman, Gardner, Sternberg) to real-world tasks you perform daily.
- Practice interpreting IQ-related statistics (heritability, SDs, correlations).
- Critically examine historical misuse of testing to understand ethical responsibilities of psychologists.
- Link neural efficiency & cortical maturation findings with developmental milestones you learned in earlier lectures.
- Apply emotional & social intelligence concepts to group projects or workplace scenarios to solidify understanding.