PS

Intelligence: Definitions, Theories, Testing, Biology, Environment, and Extremes

Learning Objectives

  • Accurately define and differentiate various conceptions of intelligence.
  • Explain the debate over whether intelligence is general (one overarching factor) or domain-specific.
  • Describe psychometric principles (reliability, validity, standardization) that guide test construction.
  • Recount the historical development of intelligence testing and related controversies (eugenics, cultural bias).
  • Outline modern multifactor theories (Gardner, Sternberg, Ceci) and additional proposed intelligences (emotional, social, wisdom, creativity).
  • Summarize biological and environmental contributions to intelligence, how these factors shape public policy, and their neural correlates.
  • Describe how brain size, neuron count, processing speed, neural efficiency, entropy, and cortical maturation correlate with IQ.
  • Identify the diagnostic criteria, causes, and life outcomes associated with intellectual disability and giftedness.

Foundational Questions About Intelligence

  • How do we distinguish intelligence from talent?
  • Is intelligence equal to wisdom? Creativity?
  • How is intelligence valued across cultures and situations?

Core Definitions

  • Intelligence: the capacity to learn, meet environmental demands effectively, and understand/​control one’s own cognitive processes.
  • Metacognition: awareness and regulation of one’s thinking; often considered a crucial component of intelligence.

Is Intelligence General or Specific?

Spearman’s Two-Factor Theory

  • Used factor analysis to examine correlations among test items.
    • Items that correlate highly form a cluster (shared variance).
  • Proposed two sources of variance in any mental-ability task:
    • g factor (general intelligence): a single, overarching ability that underlies performance on all mental tasks.
    • s factors (specific abilities): unique skills tied to particular tasks (e.g., arithmetic, verbal fluency).
    • Diagram in lecture showed a central g node connected to eight s nodes (S₁ – S₈).

Thurstone’s Primary Mental Abilities

  • Seven relatively independent abilities:
    • Verbal comprehension
    • Word fluency
    • Numerical skill
    • Spatial ability
    • Associative memory
    • Perceptual speed
    • Reasoning

Modern Multifactor Theories

Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences

  • Rejects a single IQ; posits independent intelligences tied to specific brain regions.
  • Listed intelligences:
    • Linguistic
    • Logical/​mathematical
    • Musical
    • Spatial
    • Bodily/​kinesthetic
    • Interpersonal
    • Intrapersonal
    • Naturalistic
    • Existentialist (added later by Gardner)

Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory

  1. Internal / Analytic: conventional academic problem-solving; heavily sampled by IQ tests.
  2. External / Creative: dealing with novel tasks, generating innovative ideas.
  3. Experiential / Practical: adapting to, shaping, or selecting environments ("street smarts").
  • Illustrated as three interacting components (Analytic ↔ Creative ↔ Practical).

Ceci’s Bioecological Model

  • Intelligence emerges from an interaction among:
    • Biology (innate potential)
    • Environment (ecological context)
    • Motivation (internal drive)
  • Depicted as overlapping circles (Biology, Environment, Motivation).

Measuring Intelligence: The Psychometric Approach

  • Goal: construct standardized tests that yield quantitative scores of intellectual performance.

Key Test-Construction Concepts

  • Reliability: consistency of scores.
    • Test–retest reliability: same person, two administrations.
    • Split-half reliability: correlate performance on two halves of the same test.
  • Validity: does the test measure what it claims?
    • Content validity: test content represents the domain.
    • Predictive validity: score forecasts future performance.
    • Measured via a validity coefficient (correlation with external criterion).
  • Standardization: uniform procedures for administration & scoring; creation of norms.
  • Normal distribution: bell-shaped curve; most scores cluster near the mean.
    • Empirical rule: 68 % within ±1 SD, 95 % within ±2 SD.
  • Measures of central tendency on a normal curve:
    • Mean (average)
    • Median (middle score)
    • Mode (most frequent)

Historical Milestones in Intelligence Testing

  1. Alfred Binet & Théodore Simon
    • Developed language-based test to identify French children needing help.
    • Introduced mental age concept.
  2. Lewis Terman (Stanford University)
    • Adapted Binet–Simon for U.S.; created Stanford–Binet.
    • Coined Intelligence Quotient (IQ): IQ = \frac{\text{mental age}}{\text{chronological age}} \times 100.
  3. Francis Galton
    • Believed higher "psychic energy" & sensory acuity signaled genius.
    • Built lab tests of reaction time, sensory discrimination; conceptually linked to eugenics.
  4. Eugenics Movement (dark side)
    • Used IQ to judge reproductive "fitness" of immigrants & army recruits (Terman’s era).
  5. David Wechsler
    • Noted mental-vs-chronological-age gap loses meaning in adults.
    • WAIS-IVCDN: verbal, working-memory, perceptual-reasoning & processing-speed indices.
    • Numerous subtests (e.g., Vocabulary: "What does repudiate mean?"; Block Design; Digit Span; Symbol Search). Designed for fairer testing of non-native English speakers.

Predictive Utility of IQ Tests

  • Stanford-Binet & WAIS display high reliability and predict:
    • School grades and total years of education.
    • To a lesser degree: occupational prestige, income, health behaviors, longevity.
  • Relationships are correlational, not causal.

Cultural Bias & Stereotypes

  • Average score differences among racial/​ethnic groups on traditional IQ tests.
  • Potential explanations: test bias, socioeconomic factors, stereotype threat.
  • Example of culturally loaded item: "Caesar is to salad as _ is to brandy" (answer: Napoleon).
  • Raven’s Progressive Matrices created to reduce cultural content—focus on abstract, non-verbal reasoning.

The Flynn Effect

  • Steady worldwide rise (~3 points/decade) in average IQ since early 20th century.
  • Puzzling because many scholastic achievement scores have fallen, highlighting test-specific gains & environmental influences (nutrition, schooling, complexity of modern life, etc.).

Additional Proposed Intelligences

  • Emotional Intelligence: perceive, use, understand, and regulate emotions; involves empathy & self-control.
  • Social Intelligence: navigate social environments effectively, build relationships.
  • Wisdom: make sound, morally informed judgments; seen as an outgrowth of practical intelligence.
  • Creativity: generate novel, valuable ideas; fueled by intrinsic motivation, imagination, playful "game" personality.
  • Lecture reminder: "Intelligence is the cognitive part of personality."

Biological & Environmental Influences

The Bell Curve (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994)

  • Controversial claims:
    1. IQ tests validly measure intelligence.
    2. IQ predicts success metrics (school, job, parenting, income, crime avoidance).
    3. Society is sorting into a "cognitive elite" based on IQ.
    4. Testing should gate access to opportunities.
    5. IQ is largely heritable.
    6. Average racial/ethnic IQ gaps exist.
    7. Differences likely partly genetic.

Genetic Evidence

  • Twin correlations: identical r \approx 0.86; fraternal r \approx 0.60.
  • Heritability coefficient (h²): proportion of variance due to genes (value context-specific; rises in affluent settings, falls in deprived ones).

Environmental Evidence

  • Family & home dominate early childhood outcomes.
  • Culture shapes definitions & valued expressions of intelligence (e.g., hunting skill vs. academic reasoning).
  • Occupation: complex jobs ↔ higher intelligence (bidirectional).
  • Schooling: both consequence & cause of IQ; extended education boosts cognitive skills.
  • Group differences analogy: same seeds planted in two soils → group mean differences reflect environment, not seed quality.

Enrichment Interventions

  • Early, intensive, prolonged programs yield the greatest IQ gains, but mainly for children from deprived backgrounds.
  • Must incorporate attitude & behavior supports to maintain benefits.

Neural Correlates of Intelligence

  • Larger brain size & greater neuron count in frontal lobes correlate with higher IQ.
  • Processing speed: fast sensory/​motor responses (measured via EEG) predict higher scores.
  • Neural efficiency hypothesis: bright brains show lower metabolic activity during easy tasks (less effort).
  • Brain entropy: breadth of neural configurations accessible during problem solving—higher entropy may underlie flexibility.
  • Cortical maturation: highly intelligent children exhibit prolonged thickening & later pruning of cortex, suggesting extended period of circuit refinement.

Extremes of Intelligence

Distribution

  • Normal curve with mean 100; SD 15.
  • Population percentages:
    • \pm 1 SD (85–115): 68 %
    • \pm 2 SD (70–130): 95 %
    • <70: ~2.3 % (intellectual disability)
    • >130: ~2.3 % (gifted)

Intellectual Disability (ID)

  • General criterion: IQ <70 plus deficits in adaptive functioning.
  • Mild ID (largest subgroup)
    • Usually detected at school entry; often environment related; can achieve independent adult life.
  • Moderate ID
    • Diagnosed earlier; communicate adequately; perform semi-skilled work under supervision.
  • Severe ID
    • Motor & language delays; vulnerable to seizures; require close supervision; can do basic tasks in structured settings.
  • Profound ID
    • Noticeable at birth; require highly structured, one-on-one care.
  • Down Syndrome
    • Extra material on 21st chromosome; prevalence

Giftedness

  • Top 1–2 % of population (>130 IQ or exceptional talent).
  • Often intrinsically motivated; environmental support critical; may show domain-specific strengths (e.g., emotional vs. analytic).
  • Example: Michael Kearney, who earned a bachelor’s at age 10.

Ethical, Social, & Policy Implications

  • Misuse of testing (eugenics, immigration, military screening) underscores need for culturally sensitive assessment.
  • Overemphasis on heredity can lead to deterministic policies; overemphasis on environment may ignore biological constraints.
  • Balanced view: intelligence arises from dynamic interplay of genes, environment, motivation, and culture.

Key Equations & Statistics

  • Intelligence Quotient: IQ = \frac{\text{mental age}}{\text{chronological age}} \times 100
  • Twin correlations: identical r = 0.86; fraternal r = 0.60.
  • Normal-curve rule: 68 % within \pm 1 SD, 95 % within \pm 2 SD.

Study Tips

  • Relate theories (Spearman, Gardner, Sternberg) to real-world tasks you perform daily.
  • Practice interpreting IQ-related statistics (heritability, SDs, correlations).
  • Critically examine historical misuse of testing to understand ethical responsibilities of psychologists.
  • Link neural efficiency & cortical maturation findings with developmental milestones you learned in earlier lectures.
  • Apply emotional & social intelligence concepts to group projects or workplace scenarios to solidify understanding.