CC

Microphone Fiends: Youth Music and Youth Culture

A Style Nobody Can Deal With: Politics, Style and the Postindustrial City in Hip Hop

  • Core thesis: Life on the margins of postindustrial urban America is inscribed in hip hop style; hip hop is an Afro-diasporic cultural form that negotiates the contradictions of postindustrial life by transforming abandoned urban parts into sources of pleasure and power.

    • Emerges from the intersection of lack and desire in the postindustrial city.
    • Hip hop reconciles social alienation with prophetic imagination; it anchors itself in Black cultural expressivity and Afro-Caribbean history.
    • Early practitioners grew up at the tail end of the Great Society, during the Reagan–Bush era, and in the dawn of the postindustrial city.
    • Hip hop’s transformations turn “industrial trash heaps” into tools for survival and cultural creation.

  • Key properties of hip hop (as argued to be central to its aesthetic and political force): flow, layering, rupture.

    • Flow: the movement of voice and sound through the beat in a continuous, powerful manner.
    • Layering: stacking sounds, voices, and visual elements to build complex textures.
    • Rupture: deliberate breaks in line, rhythm, or texture that interrupt continuity and create new momentum.
    • These elements function across lyrics, music, dance, and graffiti, forming a cohesive, multi-modal practice.

  • The cultural frame: postindustrial deformations shape what hip hop is and how it is read.

    • Some analysts read hip hop as postmodern; others see it as a continuation of premodern Afro-diasporic oral traditions.
    • The author argues for locating hip hop within deindustrialization and analyzing how its core properties both reflect and contest social roles for urban youth.
    • Hip hop’s forms—graffiti, breakdancing, rap—developed in relation to each other and to larger postindustrial social forces.

  • The urban context and globalization (The Urban Context section summarized):

    • Global forces reshaping American cities:
    • growth of multinational telecommunications networks
    • global economic competition
    • technological revolution
    • new international divisions of labor
    • rising power of finance relative to production
    • migration from Third World industrializing nations
    • Local effects on opportunity and inequality:
    • changes in job structures and access to housing
    • intensified racial and gender discrimination
    • consolidation of market power by multinational corporations
    • restructuring of workplaces and social mobility pressures
    • 1970s–1980s urban decline in cities like New York:
    • cuts in federal social funding; relocation of information/industrial activity to developers and luxury housing
    • widening income gaps: bottom 20% saw income decline; top 20% gained
    • Black and Hispanic households disproportionately affected by poverty and housing instability
    • Media and information technologies reshaping urban life:
    • consolidation of media power; deregulation of communications (AT&T breakup, 1982)
    • expansion of telecommunications and consumer technologies (fax, beepers, email, cable, VCRs, CDs, PCs)
    • these changes dismantled local networks and transformed modes of communication
    • Postindustrial impacts on Black and Hispanic communities:
    • greater exposure to slumlords, toxic sites, redlining, and urban disinvestment
    • increased vulnerability of immigrant and minority neighborhoods to city policy and market forces
    • The South Bronx as a focal point of these changes:
    • urban renewal and Cross-Bronx Expressway displaced tens of thousands
    • large-scale relocation disrupted kin networks and local institutions
    • the 1977 blackout looting became a national symbol of urban crisis
    • media depictions framed the South Bronx as ruin; critics argued they silenced residents’ voices
    • Youth resistance and cultural formation:
    • despite depictions of ruin, young Black and Hispanic residents built resilient cultural networks
    • hip hop emerged as an alternative system of identity, status, and community in a demolished urban landscape
    • Diffusion and regional/identity dimensions:
    • hip hop spread from New York to Roxbury, Compton, Oakland, Detroit, Chicago, and beyond via boombox tapes, cable music videos, and regional scenes
    • regional differences in styles, neighborhoods, and slang coalesced into broader Afro-diasporic language and practice
    • The social function of crews/posses:
    • crews/posses act as the local family and support system, echoing the loss of established institutions
    • these groups forge ties across intercultural lines, enabling community-scale organization and resistance

  • The aesthetic and political project of hip hop (Style and identity; “A Style Nobody Can Deal With”):

    • Central aim: transform marginal urban life into culturally expressive power while contesting dominant social narratives
    • Haunting question: what are the defining aesthetic characteristics of hip hop, and how do postindustrial conditions shape its reception?
    • The urban context’s tension: postindustrial shifts force new forms of cultural production that simultaneously reflect and resist social structures.

  • The economy of hip hop: incorporation, commodification, and resistance (Incorporation vs. Commodification; Hebdige reference)

    • Hip hop existed within and against commodity culture from the start; early practitioners used available technologies to create and distribute work
    • Over time, dominant culture recuperated subcultural signs and repackaged them as mass-market products (labelling, commodification, policing of deviance)
    • Despite corporatization, hip hop did not surrender its local meanings; it remained a hybrid with control over profit streams shifting from local entrepreneurs to multinational corporations
    • Hebdige’s framework is used to analyze how subcultures negotiate market access while preserving countercultural meanings
    • The collection argues that subcultural forms are neither purely anti-market nor completely co-opted; they operate through ongoing negotiation and redefinition of signs

  • The continuing logic of hip hop: three organizing terms and their social-significance (as articulated by Arthur Jafa and the author)

    • Flow: musical and lyrical momentum; the ability to ride the beat and maintain energy
    • Layering: stacking of sounds, visual elements, and textual cues to create depth
    • Rupture: intentional breaks that reframe the narrative and invite new interpretations
    • These terms are not just formal devices; they provide a blueprint for social resilience: build sustaining narratives, layer and embellish them, plan for and utilize ruptures as opportunities for transformation
    • The framework is applicable across forms: graffiti, breakdancing, rap
    • Hip hop’s use of these elements is rooted in and expands Afro-diasporic cultural practices, while still engaging with commodity networks

  • The politics of style and status in hip hop (identity, naming, and consumption)

    • Style as a form of resistance and self-definition; clothing and consumption become symbolic acts
    • The culture’s “prestige from below” arises from individuals and crews creating new names, personas, and stylistic signatures
    • Names function as branding of expertise and lineage (e.g., DJ names, MC names) and reflect both mastery and local status
    • Competition and collaboration among breaking, graffiti, and rap communities fuel rapid exchange and hybridization
    • The aesthetic sharing across media (television, comics, karate imagery) demonstrates how hip hop absorbs and repurposes mainstream cultural forms while maintaining counter-narratives

  • Final synthesis: hip hop as postindustrial urban renewal

    • Hip hop emerges from complex cultural exchanges and systemic disillusionment; it is a vehicle for voice, mobility, and meaning in environments of economic marginalization
    • The practice sustains itself through continual adaptation to new regional contexts while preserving its core principles of flow, layering, and rupture
    • Hip hop remains deeply connected to material realities (space, access to equipment, neighborhood networks) even as it becomes a global cultural and economic phenomenon

  • Notes on context and references (selected):

    • The analysis situates hip hop within broader urban transformation literature (postindustrial city, deindustrialization, and urban policy)
    • Hebdige’s Subculture and theories of incorporation are used to frame the tensions between creativity and commodification
    • Arthur Jafa’s framework on flow, layering, and ruptures is presented as a central interpretive tool for understanding hip hop aesthetics
    • The South Bronx is treated as a focal example of how macro-level urban change shapes cultural production, but the argument emphasizes regional diffusion and cross-cultural exchange across the Afro-diasporic world

  • Key terms to remember:

    • Postindustrial city
    • Flow, Layering, Rupture
    • Commodification / Incorporation
    • Crews / Posses
    • Afro-diasporic cultural forms
    • Recoupling of public space and cultural production

Puerto Rican And Proud, Boyee!: Rap Roots and Amnesia

  • Core argument and setting: KT (MC Tony Boston) comments on Puerto Rican diasporic identity within the Latin Empire, highlighting tensions between cultural pride and navigational flexibility in a diasporic context.

    • KT notes that many Puerto Ricans in the diaspora do not speak Spanish or engage with traditional Spanish-language music, yet they remain proud of their Puerto Rican identity.
    • This situation raises questions about cultural belonging that are decoupled from strict markers of tradition or language.

  • KT’s broader point about culture and identity:

    • Disengaging cultural belonging from fixed markers (language, music, or ritual practice) can liberate young Puerto Ricans raised in New York from feeling compelled to prove their roots in narrow ways.
    • But leaving space for route-building and bridging is not an invitation to abandon roots; instead, it foregrounds the importance of reconnecting and building cross-cultural bridges when necessary.
    • Quote (paraphrased): culture as a flexible, lived-process grounded in experience that can be reimagined beyond rigid canonical boundaries.

  • The tension between borders and bridges:

    • KT emphasizes that celebrating borders can be productive only if youth learn to build bridges and know alternatives to the “sauce” of blended culture under mainstream media influence.
    • The “sauce” refers to contemporary cultural blending and the indiscriminate mixing popularized by media pluralism; it can threaten rooted forms if not engaged critically.

  • Latin Empire and the Nuyorican rap context:

    • Latin Empire represents a major Nuyorican voice in hip hop, grappling with how to represent a Puerto Rican perspective in performances and business without losing authentic self-representation.
    • The struggle involves negotiating the pressures to fit into preestablished categories while maintaining a self-defined Puerto Rican voice.

  • Key interpretive move:

    • KT’s commentary models a stance that cultural belonging can be flexible and negotiated, rather than bound to fixed codes.
    • To draw lines and mark oneself off, one must be willing to reconnect and build bridges; culture as identity is a dynamic process rooted in lived experience, yet it must also engage with practical alternatives and cross-cultural dialogue.

  • Implications for understanding rap roots and amnesia:

    • The Puerto Rican/Nuyorican experience illustrates how diaspora, language politics, and transnational influences shape hip hop’s evolution.
    • The tension between preserving identity and engaging with broader global media economies underscores the ongoing negotiation between local authenticity and global visibility.

  • Note on scope and completeness:

    • This excerpt centers on KT’s view and the broader tension between fixed cultural markers and diasporic flexibility.
    • The passage ends with an open-ended note on cultural belonging and cross-border exchange, indicating ongoing negotiation rather than final resolution.

  • Takeaway for study:

    • Identity in hip hop is not monolithic; it is a site of ongoing negotiation among language, culture, geography, and economic power.
    • Diasporic communities use hip hop to assert pride while also confronting pressures to conform to market categories; flexibility and bridge-building are presented as strategic responses to these pressures.

  • Related concepts to connect with other readings:

    • Diaspora and cultural belonging
    • The role of language, music, and performance in identity
    • The business of rap and the politics of representation in a global media economy
    • The tension between authentic cultural expression and commodified culture

  • Closing note:

    • The excerpt engages with questions of how Puerto Rican identity traverses language and cultural markers within the hip hop world, offering a lens on both pride and the temptations of market-driven categories. The passage ends with an invitation to reconnect and build bridges, signaling an ongoing project of cultural negotiation rather than a settled conclusion.

Notes:

  • The two sections above draw from the provided transcript of essays in Microphone Fiends: Youth Music and Youth Culture (edited by Andrew Ross and Tricia Rose). The first section summarizes Tricia Rose’s essay “A Style Nobody Can Deal With: Politics, Style and the Postindustrial City in Hip Hop,” including her analysis of postindustrial urban conditions, the South Bronx, the diffusion of hip hop, and the concepts of flow, layering, and rupture. The second section summarizes Juan Flores’s piece “Puerto Rican And Proud, Boyee!: Rap Roots and Amnesia” (as reflected in the KT commentary), focusing on diasporic identity, language, and cultural negotiation within rap culture.
  • Where quotes appear in the original, I have paraphrased for note-taking readability while preserving core meaning. If you need verbatim quotes for study cards, I can insert specific lines from the text.
  • If you want these notes expanded with page references or integrated with a broader syllabus outline (e.g., linking to prior lectures or other readings), tell me which references you’d like included and I’ll add them.