Definition: Capacity planning determines the maximum output a system can sustain over time.
Objective: Ensure the organization has enough capacity to meet demand efficiently while minimizing costs.
Key Considerations:
Balancing supply and demand.
Managing resource utilization.
Avoiding undercapacity (leading to lost sales) and overcapacity (leading to increased costs).
Capacity can be measured using two approaches:
Used when a company produces a single standardized product.
Example:
A factory can produce 240 units per day.
A restaurant can serve 500 customers per hour.
Used when multiple products share resources.
Example:
Machine hours available.
Number of available seats in an airplane.
Capacity planning is categorized based on time horizons:
Focus: Major strategic decisions related to facilities, workforce, and large equipment.
Examples:
Expanding production facilities.
Investing in new technology.
Entering new markets.
Focus: Adjustments to workforce and equipment to align with market demand.
Examples:
Hiring or laying off employees.
Introducing new machinery.
Subcontracting production.
Focus: Immediate adjustments to meet fluctuating demand.
Examples:
Overtime work.
Employee transfers.
Temporary outsourcing.
Definition: Measures how much of the available capacity is being used.
Formula: Capacity Utilization=(Actual OutputMaximum Capacity)×100\text{Capacity Utilization} = \left( \frac{\text{Actual Output}}{\text{Maximum Capacity}} \right) \times 100
Example:
If a factory produces 80 units/day but has a capacity of 100 units/day: 80100×100=80%\frac{80}{100} \times 100 = 80\%
Definition: The extra capacity available to handle sudden demand increases.
Formula: Capacity Cushion=100%−Capacity Utilization\text{Capacity Cushion} = 100\% - \text{Capacity Utilization}
Example:
If a company operates at 80% utilization, the capacity cushion is 20%.
Helps in managing demand fluctuations and unexpected breakdowns.
Definition: As production volume increases, the average cost per unit decreases.
Reasons:
Fixed costs (e.g., rent, salaries) are spread over more units.
Bulk purchasing reduces material costs.
Operational efficiencies improve as processes optimize.
Example:
Fixed costs per day = $100, variable cost per unit = $10.
Producing 20 units/day: Cost per unit = (100/20) + 10 = $15.
Producing 50 units/day: Cost per unit = (100/50) + 10 = $12.
Definition: Beyond a certain output level, the cost per unit increases due to inefficiencies.
Reasons:
Complexity in managing large operations.
Coordination issues across departments.
Reduced employee productivity due to congestion and overwork.
Forecast demand for each product or service.
Convert forecasted demand into capacity requirements.
Compare current capacity vs. future demand.
If demand exceeds capacity → Expand.
If demand is lower than capacity → Reduce resources.
Options for expanding capacity:
Increasing shifts.
Buying new machines.
Subcontracting work.
Consider cost, feasibility, and long-term impact.
Choose the most cost-effective and flexible solution.
A factory produces two products (A & B) using the same type of machines.
Product | Processing Time (hours/unit) | Forecast Demand (units) |
---|---|---|
A | 0.4 | 3,000 |
B | 0.8 | 5,000 |
(0.4×3000)+(0.8×5000)=5200 hours(0.4 \times 3000) + (0.8 \times 5000) = 5200 \text{ hours}
Each machine operates 8 hours/day for 250 days/year.
Total machine hours per year = 2000 hours/machine.
Machines required: 52002000=2.6 (round up to 3 machines)\frac{5200}{2000} = 2.6 \text{ (round up to 3 machines)}
Decision trees help evaluate different capacity options when demand is uncertain.
Options:
(A) Subcontracting
(B) Build a new facility
(C) Do nothing
Demand Probability:
Low (10%)
Medium (50%)
High (40%)
Option | High Demand (40%) | Medium Demand (50%) | Low Demand (10%) | Expected Value ($000) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A (Subcontract) | $90K | $50K | $10K | $62K |
B (New Facility) | $200K | $25K | -$120K | $80.5K |
C (Do Nothing) | $60K | $40K | $20K | $46K |
Decision: Building a new facility (Option B) is the best choice based on highest expected value ($80.5K).