Perfect Competition
Perfect Competition as a Price taker
Profit maximising output
Short-run equilibrium
Long-run equilibrium
Monopoly
How monopoly arises
Single price monopolist output and price decision
Monopoly compared with Perfect Competition
Price discrimination
A firm should close down if it is making losses. (False)
A firm maximises profit if it is producing at its minimum ATC. (False)
Four types:
Perfect competition
Monopoly
Monopolistic competition
Oligopoly
Perfect competition → Monopolistic competition → Oligopoly → Monopoly (Continuum from more to less competition and less to more concentration)
Perfect Competition:
Many sellers
Homogeneous product
No barriers to entry
Examples: None
Monopolistic Competition:
Many sellers
Differentiated product
No barriers to entry
Examples: Most retails & restaurants
Oligopoly:
Few sellers
Homogeneous or Differentiated product
May be considerable barriers to entry
Examples: Most manufacturing sectors
Monopoly:
One seller
No close substitutes
Yes, barriers to entry
Examples: Some public utilities
Price taker
The PC firm is a price taker and cannot influence the price of the good or service that it produces.
In Perfect Competition, marginal revenue = price (MR = P)
Two methods to determine Profit-maximising output
Total revenue minus Total cost (TR – TC)
Marginal analysis (MR = MC) (Focus on this)
What is the firm’s profit maximising output if the market price is:
Case 1: $8?
Case 2: $4?
Case 3: $2?
Profit maximising condition: MR = MC
Case 1: If P = $8
If MR > MC ? Increase output
If MR < MC? Reduce output
profit maximising output is 10.
At Q=9, MR=8 is greater than MC=4.
The firm should increase output.
At Q=11, MR=8 is less than MC=9.
The firm should reduce output.
Need ATC
ATC = {TC}{Q}
TR = $80
TC = $51
Profit = $80 – $51 = $29
P < ATC and firm is making losses.
If P = $4 (MR = MC = 4), Q = 9
If firm shuts down, it faces a loss equivalent to TFC =$15 per day.
If it continues to produce at P=$4 and Q=9, then:
TR = 4
eq 9 = 36
TC = 4.9
eq 9 = 44
It faces a loss of 36 - 44 = $8 per day.
So, TR=36 can cover its TVC=29, and part of TFC=15.
Loss = 36 – 44 = $8 per day.
But the firm should continue to operate as long as it can cover the variable costs and recover part of its fixed costs.
We verify this by looking at AVC.
As long as P > AVC, the firm can continue to minimise losses.
Case 3: If P = $2 (MR = MC = 2)
Q = 7
P < min AVC
The firm should shutdown as the firm cannot cover the variable costs and recover its fixed costs.
If firm produces,
TR = 2
eq 7=$14
TC = $36
Loss = $22
If firm shuts down, it will face TFC=$15
Firm’s supply curve is the same as the MC curve at prices above the minimum point of AVC.
Economic profits
Normal or Zero-economic profits
Economic loss
Normal or Zero-economic profits
But why do some firms leave and others don’t?
Why Perfect Competition is the Perfect market and efficient.
Consider a coffee producer currently producing 6 tons of coffee per month. The ATC is $10 and rising; the selling price is constant at $12. If the MC of coffee is (a) $11 (b) $13 should you increase/decrease output?
Current output = 6, P = $12 and ATC is $10 and rising
(a) If MC = $11 < MR = $12: increase output
(b) If MC = $13 > MR = $12: decrease output
Four types:
Perfect competition
Monopoly
Monopolistic competition
Oligopoly
Perfect competition → Monopolistic competition → Oligopoly → Monopoly (Continuum from more to less competition and less to more concentration)
Perfect Competition:
Many sellers
Homogeneous product
No barriers to entry
Examples: None
Monopolistic Competition:
Many sellers
Differentiated product
No barriers to entry
Examples: Most retails & restaurants
Oligopoly:
Few sellers
Homogeneous or Differentiated product
May be considerable barriers to entry
Examples: Most manufacturing sectors
Monopoly:
One seller
No close substitutes
Yes, barriers to entry
Examples: Some public utilities
No close substitutes
Barriers to entry
Natural
Economies of Scale (i.e., natural monopoly)
Ownership
Control of a scarce input (e.g., Previously, DeBeers diamond syndicate controlled supply of highest quality diamonds in the world).
Legal
Govt franchises/licenses (Utilities; Casinos)
Patents
Suppose you own the only tree nursery in town.
Given the D for and MC of operating the nursery, what are your profit maximisation output & price?
Profit maximization condition? MR=MC
As we have MC, we now need to calculate MR
Illustrating demand and MR in a diagram
Where MR=MC,
profit maximizing price and output are
If we include a hypothetical ATC, we can illustrate the economic profit as shown in the shaded green area.
Suppose in the long run, firms under PC sell at price Pc.
Consumer surplus and producer surplus are maximised.
Suppose now all firms decide to merge and monopolised by one producer.
Underproduction creates a deadweight loss.
Consumer surplus shrinks while producer surplus expands.
Suppose a single-price monopolist makes an economic profit of $4.8 million.
After taking EFB231, the owner of an airline ponders … How can I increase my profit? Maybe I can capture the consumer surplus using Price Discrimination.
Discriminating among groups of buyers
This type of price discrimination works when each group has a different average willingness to pay for the good or service.
The key idea behind price discrimination is to convert consumer surplus into economic profit.
Discriminating among groups of buyers
The firm offers different prices to different types of buyers, based on things like age, employment status or some other easily distinguished characteristic.
Example: Airfares, cinema tickets, public transport
Discriminating among/between units of a Good
The firm charges the same prices to all its customers but offers a lower price per unit for a larger number of units bought.
Example: Toilet rolls, fresh milk (1L, 2L)
A study on between-group price discrimination
Puller, S.L., Taylor, L.M., 2012. Price discrimination by day-of-week of purchase: Evidence from the U.S. airline industry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 84:801-812.
Setting:
Compared tickets on the same airline and route that are purchased on different days of the week.
Considerations: day of week of travel, the ticket restrictions, the demand characteristics of the flights and the number of days in advance that the ticket is purchased.
Findings:
That fares are 5% lower when purchased on the weekend.
That weekend purchasers are more likely to be price-elastic leisure travelers.
Consider two groups: Business travelers and leisure travelers
No price discrimination
With price discrimination
By equalising MR (for each group) to MC, profit can be increased.
With price discrimination:
Business travellers:
TR = P
eq Q = 180
eq 100 = $18,000
TC = ATC
eq Q = 70
eq 100 = $7,000
Profit = TR - TC = $11,000
Leisure travellers:
TR = P
eq Q = 140
eq 100 = $14,000
TC = ATC
eq Q = 70
eq 100 = $7,000
Profit = TR - TC = $7,000
Total profit = $11,000 + $7,000 = $18,000
Without price discrimination: (150
eq 200) - (70
eq 200) = $16,000
Perfect Competition
Perfect Competition as a Price taker
Profit maximising output
Short-run equilibrium
Long-run equilibrium
Monopoly
How monopoly arises
Single price monopolist output and price decision
Monopoly compared with Perfect Competition
Price discrimination