ATTRIBUTION THEORY
attribution theory (determine attitude, shape behavior)
dispositional attribution: someone is always crabby bc internal (personality)
someones asks for notes, u think bc lazy so unsympathetic
situational attribution: someone is always crabby bc external, parents dying
someone asks for notes, u think bc sick that day so sympathetic
biases in attributions
actor/observer bias: about yourself & others
we blame own actions on situations, but others’ on personality (actor of own life)
you slipped on even ground but stranger slipping bc clumsy
fundamental atribution error: only about others
we overestimate personality/underestimate situations when judging others
cashier is rude bc bad attitude not situation like working 10 hr shift
self-serving bias: only about self
take credit for successes but blame external factors for failures (make urself feel better)
won game bc im good, lost bc ref was biased
explanatory style
optimistic:
positive events: internal, stable, global
you are smart
negative events: external, unstable, specific
external factor caused you to get into crash
consequence: better for mental health, more motivation
pessimistic:
positive events: external, unstable, specific
i was the only senior on team ofc got award
negative events: internal, stable, global
in car accident bc i terrible driver
fundamental attribution error: when analyze other behavior, underestimate impact of situation/overestimate personal disposition
LOCUS OF CONTROL
external
things happen to you
internal
you make things happen
PERSON PERCEPTION
mere exposure effect
more you see/near smth, the more you like it
self-fulfilling prophecy
if you expect someone to do smth, prophecy will results in that behavior becoming more likely
social comparison
upward: comparing onself to someone better off, inspiring/discouraging
downward (relative deprivation): comparing oneself to someone worse off, boost self-esteem
PREJUDICE & DISCRIMINATION
cognitive load
amt of mental effort used in working memory (too high, too difficult to process)
discriminatory (behaviors)
unfair action against group of ppl, behavioral expression
ex. refuse to hire elderly bc they’re bad at tech
implicit attitudes (automatic feelings w/out conscious aware)
ethnocentrism: tendency to view own culture as standard, believe superiority
believing speaking English is only way to communicate
in-group bias: your grouop is better (school, country, sex, religion)
mhs is better than other schools around here
just world phenomenon: people get what they deserve (victim blame, make us feel better)
bobby got robbed when at ATM at night: hes stupid for going at night
out-group homogeneity bias: think everyone in group you don’t to is the same
all elderly people don’t like…
prejudice (attitude)
neg/pos feeling toward a group
ex. I don’t trust teens on road
stereotype
oversimplified an generalized belief about group of people, +/-
ex. all elderly people are bad at using technology
when cognitive load high, default to steretype (shortcuts)
ATTITUDE FORMATION
belief perseverance
tendency to cling to belief even when contrary opinion
confirmation bias
believe smth is true, seek info that agrees w you/ignore opposite info
cognitive dissonance
when 2 thoughts or thought/behavior are inconsistent, we feel uncomfortable so change our behavior/thoughts or minimize inconsistency
change behavior: usually last thing to do (stop sunbathing)
change a thought: deny evidence (skin cancer not from sunbathing)
add a thought: (important to get vitaminD, can only get from sunbathing)
triviliaze inconsistency: try to justify (only go to beach once a yr)
POWER OF SITUATION
conformity
change one behavior to fit norms of everyone else
factor: social insecurity, group over 3, unanimous group, admire group, no prior commitment, being observed, culture encourages respect for social standard
everyone around you stands up at beep, you stand even when group leaves
obedience
tendency to comply w/ oders from someone perceived as authority
persuasion - elaboration likelihood model (influence)
central route to persuasion (long term): analytical/logical exam of choice
ad: list comfiness, uniqueness, price of shoe
candidate A has strong record/qualities
door in face technique: tendency to agree w/ reasonable request after being asked larger one
ask teacher for week extension than ask for extension till midnight (more likely yes)
foot in door technique: tendency to comply w/ larger request after complied w/ smaller one
joining cult: ask for name, than coffee meetup, than go to 1 group meeting, than go to weekly meeting (joined)
said yes to one thing, likely say yes again
peripheral route to persuasion (short term): choice influenced by incidental cues (emotion)
ad: picture of serena williams wearing shoes
candidate A has annoying voice so vote for B
halo effect: tendency for positive impressions in one area to influence feeling of them in other areas
pretty, so must be smart/hard working
social influence theory
informational social influence: conforming bc others seen as source of correct info
follow bc you dont know what to do, not bc you think you’ll be judged
follow locals when traveling
normative social influence: desire to follow norms to gain approval/avoid disapproval
ppl laught at joke dont find funny bc others laugh
GROUPS
collectivism
values group harmony, shared goals, comunity over individual desire
soccer team share prize $ equally tho one person scored most
deindividuation
loss of self-aware/restraint when in group situations that fosters anonymity
more comfortable dancing in group
say hate words when masked/online
diffusion of responsibility
when others present, feel less sure of role/take less ownership of what happens
someone hurt, don’t call 911 bc think someone else will
false consensus effect
tendency to overestimate how much others agree w/ your behavior/opinion
everyone skips breakfast
group polarization
feel even more strongly about idea after spending time w/ like-minded ppl
spend time at star wars convention, become huge fan
groupthink
group cohesiveness is more important than facts (lead to defective decisions)
everyone says yes to leader even though think it’s bad idea
individualism
values independence, personal goals, self reliance over group needs
leila chooses college for her interest rather than fam wish
company reward employee on individual performance not group effort
industrial-org psychologists
psychologist who sway/improve workplace behavior, productivity, employee satisfaction
design hiring process to lower bias
multiculturalism
idea that different cultures should be valued and exist w/in society
city hosts festivals for many cultures
social facilitation
often perform simple/well-learned tasks better in presence of others
types name faster w/ audience
social inhibition
often perform comples/new tasks worse in presence of others
typed long sentence slower w/ audience
social loafing
exert less effort in group than when individually accountable
if in tug of war, exert less effort the bigger your group
social traps
when individuals act in own short term interest, cause harm to group in long run
farmer clears forest for crops, help him get profit but deforest hurt ecosystem
superordinate goals
goals that diff groups must work together to achieve, reduce conflict
2 rival schools work together to raise $ for charity
PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR
altruism - help other w/out expecting smth in return
bystander effect: when presence of other reduce helping behavior (diffusion of responsibility)
someone collapses, no one calls 911
social debt: feeling obligation to return favor/help after getting help from them
someone helps you w/ math hw, obligated to help them too
social reciprocity norm: help those who helped them.ight help them in future
friend helps you move, you offer to help them w/ project
social responsibility norm: beleive that ppl should help those in need bc right thing
stranger helps elderly cross street