3. Forgetting and Remembering (2)

Page 1: Introduction

  • Forgetting and Remembering

  • Course: Psychology ATAR

  • Instructor: Mrs Surty

Page 2: Unit Overview

  • Key Topics:

    • Memory: Understanding the processes of forgetting and remembering.

    • Forgetting:

      • Types of forgetting

      • Retrieval failure

      • Interference (proactive and retroactive)

      • Motivated forgetting

      • Decay theory

    • Remembering:

      • Roles of recall (free, serial, cued), recognition, and relearning in memory

      • Levels of processing model (Craik and Lockhart, 1972)

      • Shallow (structural, phonemic) vs Deep (semantic, elaborative) processing

    • Study Reference: Depth of processing and retention of words (Craik and Tulving, 1975)

    • Rehearsal: Techniques to improve memory (maintenance rehearsal, elaborative rehearsal)

    • Ebbinghaus's Forgetting Curve (1885): Role of repetition in memory retention.

Page 3: Forgetting Defined

  • Forgetting:

    • Failure to retrieve stored information.

Page 4: Retrieval Failure

  • Defined as the

    • Inability to retrieve specific information.

    • Retrieval Failure Theory:

      • Failure due to lack of retrieval cues or ineffective use of them.

      • Retrieval Cues: Mental prompts created to aid recollection.

    • Tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon (TOT):

      • Feeling that a known fact is momentarily inaccessible.

    • Could involve interference theory: Noted when available information is blocked by interference from similar data.

    • Example: Difficulty recalling dinner on a specific past date.

Page 5: Interference as a Form of Forgetting

  • Interference:

    • Difficulty recalling due to competition with similar information.

    • Proactive Interference:

      • Old information inhibits learning new information.

      • Example: Incorrectly using an old password.

    • Retroactive Interference:

      • New information inhibits retrieval of old information.

      • Example: Forgetting past class names after learning new ones.

Page 6: Proactive vs. Retroactive Interference

  • Proactive Interference:

    • Old learning disrupts the encoding of new material (e.g. learning Italian verbs affecting Spanish verbs).

  • Retroactive Interference:

    • New learning affects retrieval of old information (e.g. learning new Spanish verbs hinders recall of old Italian verbs).

Page 7: Evidence for Interference

  • Study 1:

    • Participants who slept after learning 80 nonsense words showed better recall than those who continued with daily activities.

Page 8: Motivated Forgetting

  • Defined as

    • Inability to remember certain information due to potential advantages of forgetting.

    • Common with painful or traumatic memories.

    • Types of motivated forgetting:

      • Repression: Unconsciously blocking unwanted memories.

      • Suppression: Consciously ignoring painful memories.

Page 9: Decay Theory

  • States that memory fades over time.

    • Most apparent in sensory and working memory.

    • Some psychologists believe that memories do not decay but simply remain unrecalled until triggered.

    • Limitations:

      • Fails to explain occasions when forgotten memories are recalled later.

      • Some elderly individuals recall distant events but forget recent ones.

Page 10: Anterograde Amnesia

  • Defined as the loss of ability to form new memories following amnesia onset.

    • Causes: disease, accidents, brain surgery, drug use.

    • Notably occurs after consuming large amounts of alcohol (blackouts).

    • Example: HM's case of not forming lasting new memories post-surgery.

Page 12: Retrograde Amnesia

  • Defined as memory disruption of events prior to the amnesic event.

    • Causes: brain injuries (e.g. collisions).

    • Example: HM's inability to recall events before surgery; Krickitt Carpenter's loss of wedding memories.

Page 15: Types of Remembering

  • Recall: Retrieving information from memory independently (no cues).

  • Recognition: Identifying correct information from alternatives.

  • Relearning: Learning previously learned information again, typically faster than the first time.

Page 16: Recall Types

  • Free Recall: Responding with as much information as possible in any order, without cues.

  • Serial Recall: Recalling in the order presented.

  • Cued Recall: Assisted recall using cues.

Page 18: Recognition

  • Involves identifying previously learned information among alternatives.

    • Recognition improved by prompts or cues, especially for visual stimuli.

    • Affected individuals with amnesia can recognize learned words but fail to recall them.

Page 19: Context Cues

  • Additional information related to the circumstances during encoding.

    • Example: Learning in a quiet environment aids recall in similar exam settings.

Page 20: State Cues

  • Information regarding emotional or physiological states at the time of encoding can trigger memories.

    • Example: Specific emotional states may evoke past similar feelings.

Page 21: Distractors

  • Recognition can be compromised by distractors, particularly similar options in multiple-choice formats.

    • Misleading distractors can lead to false positives in recognition.

Page 22: Recall vs. Recognition

  • Recognition generally seen as superior due to retrieval cues.

    • Faster and easier than recall due to survival advantages programmed in the brain.

    • Can process recognition subconsciously.

Page 23: Relearning

  • Learning previously memorized material again and measuring retention.

    • Faster relearning indicates some retained information despite perceived forgetfulness.

    • Retention improves after the first learning experience.

Page 27: Levels of Processing Model (Craik and Lockhart, 1972)

  • Memory understood as a continuum based on ease of retrieval.

    • Involves making associations between new and previous knowledge.

    • Deep processing enhances retrieval chances.

    • More effective learning results from meaningful engagement with material rather than mere repetition.

Page 28: Types of Encoding and Processing

  • Shallow Processing: Understanding physical features/appearance (structural), and sounds (phonemic).

  • Deep Processing: Understanding meaning (semantic) facilitating better recall.

    • Increased recall percentages correlate with processing depth (20% shallow, 50% moderate, 80% semantic).

Page 29: Depth of Processing Study (Craik and Tulving, 1975)

  • Aim, method, findings, and contributions to psychology; evaluated critiques and limitations.

Page 30: Levels of Processing Model Insights

  • Not structured like traditional multi-store models, emphasizing processing as key.

    • Deeper processing is linked to stronger memory traces.

Page 38: Improving Short-Term Memory

  • Chunking: Grouping information to enhance retention (e.g., mobile numbers).

  • Rehearsal: Techniques for prolonging memory retention.

    • Maintenance Rehearsal: Repetition for short-term retention.

    • Elaborative Rehearsal: Linking new information with existing knowledge; enhancing meaningful associations.

    • Mnemonics: Strategies that aid memorization (e.g. Atkinson and Shiffrin model).

Page 39: Types of Memory Rehearsal

  • Elaborative Rehearsal: Supports long-term retention through context and meaningful associations.

  • Maintenance Rehearsal: Focuses on short-term retention through repetition without deeper meaning.

Page 42: Role of Repetition in Memory

  • Significant for retaining information over time.

    • Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve: Rapid initial forgetting followed by gradual decline.

    • Emphasizes the importance of consistent practice in delaying forgetting.

Page 43: Key Role of Repetition

  • Maintains and refreshes memory across both short-term and long-term memory.

  • Strengthens neural pathways for easier recall.

  • Spacing Effect: Spaced repetition proves more beneficial than massed repetition for long-term retention.

Page 44: Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve Case Study

  • Pioneered systematic research on memory retention.

  • Studied types of nonsense syllables for measuring recall over time; results exhibited rapid forgetting post-learning.

    • Findings maintain consistent patterns across various forms of memory retention.

    • Majority forgetting occurs soon after initial learning, underpinning the significance of effective rehearsal methods.

robot