Chapter 2: Understanding Theory
What is Theory?
Theory is created by one or more small number of sociologists working together, it attempts to explain a particular aspect of the social structure or a kind of social interaction between individuals
Theoretical Perspectives are groups of theories that share certain common ways of “seeing” how society works.
There are three main theoretical perspectives in sociology
Structural Functionalism
Conflict Theory
Symbolic Interaction
Understanding the Structural Functionalist Perspective
Structural Functionalism is the view of modern societies as consisting of interdependent parts working together for the good of the whole
Social Solidarity is the moral order of society
Families, religion, education, and other institutions teach individuals to help society function smoothly
Durkheim and Types of Societies
Emile Durkheim examined social solidarity throughout history
Mechanical Solidarity is solidarity derived from the similarity of its members
Observed in smaller, preindustrial societies
Organic Solidarity is solidarity where societies operate like a living organism, with various parts, each specializing in only certain tasks but dependent on the others for survival.
As societies evolved and science grew over religion, and jobs became more differentiated during the industrial era
Social Harmony occurs when a society with organic solidarity is “healthy,” where the parts of the society are working well together
Social Order is how the components of a society work together to maintain the society
Social Institutions
Social Institutions are sets of statues and toles focused around one central aspect of society
Micro-level Analysis focuses on either an individual or small groups
Structural functionalists note that there are seven primary social institutions
Family
Religion
Economy
Education
Government
Health Care
Media
Each social institution fulfills tasks on behalf of society
Structural functionalism calls these task functions
Manifest Functions
Manifest Functions are obvious and stated reasons that a social institution exists
Ex: family social institution
One function is to procreate, or else society would have died after one generation
So a manifest function of the family institution in any society is a reproduction
Societies can have multiple manifest functions: families also need to teach children the cultural norms and values of their particular society a process also known as socialization
Latent Functions
Latent Functions are unintended consequences of an institution
Ex: family institutions
If manifest function is to reproduce and socialize children
Latent functions are how families help the economic institution
Helping the economy is a good thing but not a core function of families
Dysfunction are an unintended consequence of behavioral patterns
Seeing the Social World Using Structural Functionalism
Unit of analysis is what is being examined
Using the structural-functional lens, sociologists see that social institutions construct stability and order
Curbing Violations of Social Norms
What about individuals who choose to act against shared cultural norms? How does structural functionalism see that person
that person violated social norms
Maybe he wasn't properly socialized by parents and therefore didn't properly learn the norms, or maybe learned them but didn't see them as acceptable, or he was selfish, etc.
Structural functionalist theorists believe that punishment is required for 2 reasons
accepting one’s punishment is a step in the rehabilitation/resocialization process of the individual back into the community (if possible)
structural-functionalist theories, building on the sociological work of Emile Durkheim also worry that without punishment, “bad” behavior will spread like an epidemic in the community
Social Change
Social Change is a large-scale, macroscopic, structural shift in society
Sociologists see change happening when there are large-scale, macro-structural shifts in society or institutions within one of more societies
Functionalists bc they see harmony deriving from the stable functioning of institutions and cooperation among them are not so sure that a lot of social change is a good thing.
What Doesn’t Structural Functionalism See?
Can rapid social change and the disharmony that comes along with it ever be a good thing for society to experience?
Structural functionalist theorists would argue that no, it wouldn’t be a good thing.
Even in case of clear good change/outcome like an immediate call for change in sex discrimination functionalist wouldn't be a fan
Not because they support sex discrimination but because they want slow incremental change so they can check every step along the way
Structural Functionalism, by focusing on the need for social order & harmony, con overlooks times in the life of the society where rapid social change- even if it may lead to some social chaos is the just thing to do
Understanding the Conflict Theoretical Perspective
Conflict Theory is the second macro-theoretical perspective
Conflict Perspective is the tensions and conflict that arise when resources, status, and power are not distributed equitably; these conflicts then become the driving force for change
Karl Marx and Advanced Capitalism
Marx believed that there were 10 stages of societal development but was most concerned with the last 3 stages- capitalism, socialism, and communism
Stage 8: Advanced Capitalism
Marx held that advanced capitalism is an economic system based on profit and the pursuit of maximum profit
Bourgeoise is the rich owners of the means of production
Means of Production is the technology and materials needed to produce products
Proletariat are the workers, those who don’t own the means of production
Lumpenproletariat is the perpetually unemployed
Advanced capitalism from Marx’s time is very different from modern American capitalism.
False Consciousness
For Marx and like-minded individuals of this era, the exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoise was a bit confusing to see,
like why didn’t the proletariat realize they were being economically exploited under capitalism
Marx theorized workers were in a state of false consciousness
False Consciousness is Marx’s theory that the proletariat did not understand how they were being mistreated and misled by the owners of the means of production
Species Being and Alienation
Species Being is the unique potential to imagine and then create what we imagine
Humans can sketch fantastically intricate designs and make them become real in the world
However, the proletariat was prevented from living up to their species being by the various nature of capitalist exploitation
Humans ended up living in a state of Alienation
Alienation is the theoretical concept to describe the isolation, dehumanizing, and disenchanting effects of working within a capitalist system of production
Karl Marx and Socialism
Marx felt that to move the proletariat from false consciousness to true consciousness, the proletariat had to come to grips with the depths of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie
True Consciousness is when the proletariat is no longer in false consciousness and is aware of how they are being mistreated and misled.
He believed that when the proletarian revolution began, society would move from the eighth stage of societal development to the ninth stage
Stage 9: Socialism
Marx predicted this stage would last a few generations before society would be ready for the tenth stage of social development: communism
Karl Marx and Communism
Marx’s vision never became a reality, not even in nations that consider themselves a communist
Marx believed that after a few generations of socialism as an economic system, some of the key social institutions, such as political and economic systems, would no longer be needed and would disappear
Under communism, all citizens would be equal and at long last be able to fulfill their species being
Communism under Karl Marx’s conceptualization of communism all citizens would be queal and able to fulfill their species-being.
From Marx to the Conflict perspective
Mostly in the US, in the 1960s: Marx’s theory became the intellectual foundation for our second macro-theoretical perspective- the conflict perspective
Conflict theorists argue that Marx’s theory was too narrow, oppression doesn’t have to be only economic in nature
Modern conflict theorists recognize many ways in which social rewards are unequally distributed
Race, ethnicity, gender, sex, sexual orientation, citizenship status, age, ability/disability
Sociologists using the conflict perspective use different terms to reflect this social reality
Seeing the Social World Using the Conflict Perspective
Conflict theorists see oppression: as the haves holding the have-nots back to maintain their own elevated status
Value Coercion is an idea that the haves use their power over the major institutions to force their values onto the have-nots as part of their effort to maintain their higher-status positions in society
The media for example rarely tell stories about the working class
When they do, the middle class is buffonish (like homer Simpson) or overweight(mama June from toddlers and tiaras and here comes honey boo boo, before she lost weight)
Tv news also does this when they use racial terms to describe criminals of color but ignore rave when the criminal is white
When repeated society will think of poor equaling bad, and black or Hispanic equal criminal
Conflict thinkers, unlike structural functionalists, don’t see social problems as a result of some “bad individuals” rather they regard the inequitable distribution of rewards as the cause of most social problems
What Doesn’t Conflict Theorists See?
The conflict perspective is so focused on oppression they overlook movements when society is doing well
In doing so they overlook things of societal harmony and equilibrium
Conflict theorists don’t always acknowledge how disruptive and harmful change can be as well
Subperspectives in Conflict Theory
The conflict perspective while unified in the focus of oppression and efforts to combat it has split into sub perspectives
Examples
the feminist conflict theorists argue that men as a category of people have greater access to social rewards than women
Critical race theorists focus on the social construction of race and the white-dominated racial hierarchy
Disability scholars frequently use the conflict perspective to analyze how modern Westen Societies create the built environment in ways that worked for able-bodied people but not those living with disabilities
Understanding the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective
Macro lens miss something vital to the study of people in groups: interaction between individuals- at the micro-level
Symbolic Interactionism is the way individuals behave and interact with other people
We can use it to examine how any one person develops their sense of self
Self or the sense of self is the knowledge that she or he is unique, separate from every other human
The Social Construction of Reality
Interactionist theorists study culture comes to be created
Culture is the way of life of a particular group of people
Consists of norms, and symbols through which we communicate, values, etc.
Socialization can happen at any time in a person’s life but is most intense in childhood
Primary Socialization is the socialization that occurs in childhood, the most intense time for socialization
The Looking Glass Self Theory
A child’s first step in developing a sense of self is to imagine how she appears to relevant others- parents, siblings, grandparents, and so on
The second step, the child reacts to feedback given by parents and others give about their perceptions of the child
Could be verbal - like I love you - or nonverbal - hugs, slaps, holding handles, etc.
Finally the third step, the child integrated the first two into a coherent and unique sense of self
Primary Groups are small collections of people of which a person is a member, usually for life, and in which deep emotional ties develop
While socialization in childhood is fundamental, cooley would argue that socialization continues throughout a person’s life
Dramaturgical Theory
Interactionism doesn’t just focus on the construction of self, Erving Goofman analyzed the interaction between small groups as if it was a play.
Social Actors are individuals involved in interactions
Social Scripts are the interactional rules that people use to guide an interaction
Props are material objects
Dramaturgical theory can be helpful in examining all types of social interactions
Often performances involve teams of individuals, not just two people, and interaction accusing in particular settings
Front Stage is where an interaction actually takes place
Back Stage is where one prepares for an interaction
Presentation of Self Skills are efforts to shape physical, verbal, visual, and gestural messages that we give to others to achieve impression management
What Doesn’t Symbolic Interactionism See?
Symbolic interactionism doesn’t examine of see the causes of social problems, how to solve them and the rate of change like macro theoretical perspectives do
Social Constructionism
Social Constionism holds that every society creates norms, values, objects, and symbols that it finds meaningful and useful
Constructionists argue while culture/society hoes exist and is felt by the individuals it is ultimately created and sustained by social systems, which must be made more just
that is it more important to study the idea of poverty than individual poor people
Focus on the constructed nature of every stratification system
Ex. wealth/poverty, race, sex/gender, age, digital divide, etc.
Full Theoretical Circle
Each family creates, within reason its own norms for how to raise children and implements those norms
But what do we mean by “within reason”?
Society determines what is “reasonable” it is socially constructed
Over time certain behavioral patterns will become more acceptable in society and become the institutionalized version
Over time we have come full circle
What is Theory?
Theory is created by one or more small number of sociologists working together, it attempts to explain a particular aspect of the social structure or a kind of social interaction between individuals
Theoretical Perspectives are groups of theories that share certain common ways of “seeing” how society works.
There are three main theoretical perspectives in sociology
Structural Functionalism
Conflict Theory
Symbolic Interaction
Understanding the Structural Functionalist Perspective
Structural Functionalism is the view of modern societies as consisting of interdependent parts working together for the good of the whole
Social Solidarity is the moral order of society
Families, religion, education, and other institutions teach individuals to help society function smoothly
Durkheim and Types of Societies
Emile Durkheim examined social solidarity throughout history
Mechanical Solidarity is solidarity derived from the similarity of its members
Observed in smaller, preindustrial societies
Organic Solidarity is solidarity where societies operate like a living organism, with various parts, each specializing in only certain tasks but dependent on the others for survival.
As societies evolved and science grew over religion, and jobs became more differentiated during the industrial era
Social Harmony occurs when a society with organic solidarity is “healthy,” where the parts of the society are working well together
Social Order is how the components of a society work together to maintain the society
Social Institutions
Social Institutions are sets of statues and toles focused around one central aspect of society
Micro-level Analysis focuses on either an individual or small groups
Structural functionalists note that there are seven primary social institutions
Family
Religion
Economy
Education
Government
Health Care
Media
Each social institution fulfills tasks on behalf of society
Structural functionalism calls these task functions
Manifest Functions
Manifest Functions are obvious and stated reasons that a social institution exists
Ex: family social institution
One function is to procreate, or else society would have died after one generation
So a manifest function of the family institution in any society is a reproduction
Societies can have multiple manifest functions: families also need to teach children the cultural norms and values of their particular society a process also known as socialization
Latent Functions
Latent Functions are unintended consequences of an institution
Ex: family institutions
If manifest function is to reproduce and socialize children
Latent functions are how families help the economic institution
Helping the economy is a good thing but not a core function of families
Dysfunction are an unintended consequence of behavioral patterns
Seeing the Social World Using Structural Functionalism
Unit of analysis is what is being examined
Using the structural-functional lens, sociologists see that social institutions construct stability and order
Curbing Violations of Social Norms
What about individuals who choose to act against shared cultural norms? How does structural functionalism see that person
that person violated social norms
Maybe he wasn't properly socialized by parents and therefore didn't properly learn the norms, or maybe learned them but didn't see them as acceptable, or he was selfish, etc.
Structural functionalist theorists believe that punishment is required for 2 reasons
accepting one’s punishment is a step in the rehabilitation/resocialization process of the individual back into the community (if possible)
structural-functionalist theories, building on the sociological work of Emile Durkheim also worry that without punishment, “bad” behavior will spread like an epidemic in the community
Social Change
Social Change is a large-scale, macroscopic, structural shift in society
Sociologists see change happening when there are large-scale, macro-structural shifts in society or institutions within one of more societies
Functionalists bc they see harmony deriving from the stable functioning of institutions and cooperation among them are not so sure that a lot of social change is a good thing.
What Doesn’t Structural Functionalism See?
Can rapid social change and the disharmony that comes along with it ever be a good thing for society to experience?
Structural functionalist theorists would argue that no, it wouldn’t be a good thing.
Even in case of clear good change/outcome like an immediate call for change in sex discrimination functionalist wouldn't be a fan
Not because they support sex discrimination but because they want slow incremental change so they can check every step along the way
Structural Functionalism, by focusing on the need for social order & harmony, con overlooks times in the life of the society where rapid social change- even if it may lead to some social chaos is the just thing to do
Understanding the Conflict Theoretical Perspective
Conflict Theory is the second macro-theoretical perspective
Conflict Perspective is the tensions and conflict that arise when resources, status, and power are not distributed equitably; these conflicts then become the driving force for change
Karl Marx and Advanced Capitalism
Marx believed that there were 10 stages of societal development but was most concerned with the last 3 stages- capitalism, socialism, and communism
Stage 8: Advanced Capitalism
Marx held that advanced capitalism is an economic system based on profit and the pursuit of maximum profit
Bourgeoise is the rich owners of the means of production
Means of Production is the technology and materials needed to produce products
Proletariat are the workers, those who don’t own the means of production
Lumpenproletariat is the perpetually unemployed
Advanced capitalism from Marx’s time is very different from modern American capitalism.
False Consciousness
For Marx and like-minded individuals of this era, the exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoise was a bit confusing to see,
like why didn’t the proletariat realize they were being economically exploited under capitalism
Marx theorized workers were in a state of false consciousness
False Consciousness is Marx’s theory that the proletariat did not understand how they were being mistreated and misled by the owners of the means of production
Species Being and Alienation
Species Being is the unique potential to imagine and then create what we imagine
Humans can sketch fantastically intricate designs and make them become real in the world
However, the proletariat was prevented from living up to their species being by the various nature of capitalist exploitation
Humans ended up living in a state of Alienation
Alienation is the theoretical concept to describe the isolation, dehumanizing, and disenchanting effects of working within a capitalist system of production
Karl Marx and Socialism
Marx felt that to move the proletariat from false consciousness to true consciousness, the proletariat had to come to grips with the depths of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie
True Consciousness is when the proletariat is no longer in false consciousness and is aware of how they are being mistreated and misled.
He believed that when the proletarian revolution began, society would move from the eighth stage of societal development to the ninth stage
Stage 9: Socialism
Marx predicted this stage would last a few generations before society would be ready for the tenth stage of social development: communism
Karl Marx and Communism
Marx’s vision never became a reality, not even in nations that consider themselves a communist
Marx believed that after a few generations of socialism as an economic system, some of the key social institutions, such as political and economic systems, would no longer be needed and would disappear
Under communism, all citizens would be equal and at long last be able to fulfill their species being
Communism under Karl Marx’s conceptualization of communism all citizens would be queal and able to fulfill their species-being.
From Marx to the Conflict perspective
Mostly in the US, in the 1960s: Marx’s theory became the intellectual foundation for our second macro-theoretical perspective- the conflict perspective
Conflict theorists argue that Marx’s theory was too narrow, oppression doesn’t have to be only economic in nature
Modern conflict theorists recognize many ways in which social rewards are unequally distributed
Race, ethnicity, gender, sex, sexual orientation, citizenship status, age, ability/disability
Sociologists using the conflict perspective use different terms to reflect this social reality
Seeing the Social World Using the Conflict Perspective
Conflict theorists see oppression: as the haves holding the have-nots back to maintain their own elevated status
Value Coercion is an idea that the haves use their power over the major institutions to force their values onto the have-nots as part of their effort to maintain their higher-status positions in society
The media for example rarely tell stories about the working class
When they do, the middle class is buffonish (like homer Simpson) or overweight(mama June from toddlers and tiaras and here comes honey boo boo, before she lost weight)
Tv news also does this when they use racial terms to describe criminals of color but ignore rave when the criminal is white
When repeated society will think of poor equaling bad, and black or Hispanic equal criminal
Conflict thinkers, unlike structural functionalists, don’t see social problems as a result of some “bad individuals” rather they regard the inequitable distribution of rewards as the cause of most social problems
What Doesn’t Conflict Theorists See?
The conflict perspective is so focused on oppression they overlook movements when society is doing well
In doing so they overlook things of societal harmony and equilibrium
Conflict theorists don’t always acknowledge how disruptive and harmful change can be as well
Subperspectives in Conflict Theory
The conflict perspective while unified in the focus of oppression and efforts to combat it has split into sub perspectives
Examples
the feminist conflict theorists argue that men as a category of people have greater access to social rewards than women
Critical race theorists focus on the social construction of race and the white-dominated racial hierarchy
Disability scholars frequently use the conflict perspective to analyze how modern Westen Societies create the built environment in ways that worked for able-bodied people but not those living with disabilities
Understanding the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective
Macro lens miss something vital to the study of people in groups: interaction between individuals- at the micro-level
Symbolic Interactionism is the way individuals behave and interact with other people
We can use it to examine how any one person develops their sense of self
Self or the sense of self is the knowledge that she or he is unique, separate from every other human
The Social Construction of Reality
Interactionist theorists study culture comes to be created
Culture is the way of life of a particular group of people
Consists of norms, and symbols through which we communicate, values, etc.
Socialization can happen at any time in a person’s life but is most intense in childhood
Primary Socialization is the socialization that occurs in childhood, the most intense time for socialization
The Looking Glass Self Theory
A child’s first step in developing a sense of self is to imagine how she appears to relevant others- parents, siblings, grandparents, and so on
The second step, the child reacts to feedback given by parents and others give about their perceptions of the child
Could be verbal - like I love you - or nonverbal - hugs, slaps, holding handles, etc.
Finally the third step, the child integrated the first two into a coherent and unique sense of self
Primary Groups are small collections of people of which a person is a member, usually for life, and in which deep emotional ties develop
While socialization in childhood is fundamental, cooley would argue that socialization continues throughout a person’s life
Dramaturgical Theory
Interactionism doesn’t just focus on the construction of self, Erving Goofman analyzed the interaction between small groups as if it was a play.
Social Actors are individuals involved in interactions
Social Scripts are the interactional rules that people use to guide an interaction
Props are material objects
Dramaturgical theory can be helpful in examining all types of social interactions
Often performances involve teams of individuals, not just two people, and interaction accusing in particular settings
Front Stage is where an interaction actually takes place
Back Stage is where one prepares for an interaction
Presentation of Self Skills are efforts to shape physical, verbal, visual, and gestural messages that we give to others to achieve impression management
What Doesn’t Symbolic Interactionism See?
Symbolic interactionism doesn’t examine of see the causes of social problems, how to solve them and the rate of change like macro theoretical perspectives do
Social Constructionism
Social Constionism holds that every society creates norms, values, objects, and symbols that it finds meaningful and useful
Constructionists argue while culture/society hoes exist and is felt by the individuals it is ultimately created and sustained by social systems, which must be made more just
that is it more important to study the idea of poverty than individual poor people
Focus on the constructed nature of every stratification system
Ex. wealth/poverty, race, sex/gender, age, digital divide, etc.
Full Theoretical Circle
Each family creates, within reason its own norms for how to raise children and implements those norms
But what do we mean by “within reason”?
Society determines what is “reasonable” it is socially constructed
Over time certain behavioral patterns will become more acceptable in society and become the institutionalized version
Over time we have come full circle