The Mexican-American War was a deeply controversial conflict that influenced many aspects of American society and politics.
Henry David Thoreau famously protested against the war, leading to his jail time and the writing of his essay that would later influence figures like Gandhi and Martin Luther King.
The war is often viewed through conflicting narratives: one as a march of progress for America and the other as an act of theft against Mexico.
Background: The war originated primarily over the disputed territory of Texas, which was once Mexican land when Mexico gained independence from Spain.
Instability in Mexico: In the early to mid-1800s, Mexico faced significant internal government instability, making it difficult to control distant lands like Texas.
American Expansion: American settlers, attracted by economic opportunities in Texas, began migrating and planting cotton farms, contributing to tensions over land ownership and governance.
Population Shift: American settlers began to outnumber Mexicans significantly, leading to claims of a manifest destiny to claim the land.
Definition: Manifest Destiny is the belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable.
Cultural Context: This idea draws from religious and ethnocentric ideologies reminiscent of Puritan ideals, claiming divine approval for westward expansion.
Rhetorical Strategy: Used as a justification for war with Mexico, it framed the conflict as a necessary step in fulfilling America's destiny, necessitating the acquisition of new territories.
Texas Independence: Texan settlers declared independence from Mexico, leading to confrontations such as the Battle of the Alamo, which fueled American sentiment for war.
US Military Involvement: The US government sent military support to Texas under President Polk, solidifying the path toward war.
Treaty and Land Acquisition: The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, granting the U.S. vast territories, including parts of present-day California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.
The treaty promised rights to citizenship and property protections for Mexican landowners in the newly acquired territories.
Immediate Conflict: The discovery of gold in California shortly after the war initiated a massive influx of settlers, undermining the treaty's promises.
Land Ownership Issues: By 1860, Mexican landowners had lost around 90% of their land due to legal manipulation, cultural disadvantages, and American squatter claims.
Squatter Rights: New settlers, often failed gold seekers, claimed lands by asserting squatter rights, taking advantage of a lack of proper legal documentation from Mexican landowners.
Cultural Disparities: Mexican landowners, adhering to handshake agreements, found their claims dismissed in courts favoring American settlers, further complicating the issue of land ownership.
Legal Manipulations: Lawyers began to exploit these situations, facilitating property claims that disregarded or undermined the rights promised in the treaty.
Cultural Symbol: Joaquin Murrieta emerged as a folklore hero representing resistance against injustice faced by Mexicans in California.
Contradictory Narratives: To Mexicans, he was seen as Robin Hood; to Americans, as a violent outlaw.
Execution and Display: His beheading and display of his head as a trophy symbolized the brutal realities of racial dynamics and control over Mexican populations post-war.
Historical Context: Throughout the 19th century, Mexican immigration was not seen as a problem, but attitudes shifted dramatically during the Great Depression.
Demonization of Immigrants: Economic hardships led to scapegoating of Mexican immigrants, with many citizens being deported unjustly, often despite their American citizenship.
Impact of the Great Depression: The socio-economic crisis exacerbated existing racial prejudices, leading to mass deportations under the assumption that Mexican laborers were a threat to American jobs.
Community Displacement: Residents of Chavez Ravine were promised improvements and housing projects but were ultimately displaced in favor of establishing Dodger Stadium.
Government Promises: Initially, offers were made for residents to vacate temporarily for better living conditions, which were later reneged.
Cultural Erasure: The empty land where the stadium sits is a stark reminder of broken promises to a community and signifies a continued pattern of land theft and disregard for minority communities.