Author: William R. Scott
Context: Chapter from Regina be Blaszezyk's "Producy Fashion: commerce, Culture, and Consumers" (2008)
Focus: The evolution of California's leisurewear industry from the early 1930s to the 1960s
1945 Fortune Magazine Insight: Los Angeles transitioned from a minor fashion center to the third largest clothing hub in the U.S.
Impact on American Fashion: California produced 85% of its menswear for national markets, indicating exceptional growth in the leisurewear sector.
Postwar Consumption Explosion: Los Angeles emerged as the second-largest fashion capital, surpassing traditional centers like Paris and Chicago by the late 1950s.
Shift from Formal to Casual: The three-piece suit and traditional masculine attire declined in popularity.
Example: By the 1960s, wearing any suit at a beach became socially unacceptable.
Rise of Casual Sportswear: The casual and informal dress became the norm in leisure settings.
Location Influence: California’s unique lifestyle influenced fashion trends nationally, reaching consumers in various regions, including the Midwest and New England.
Definition of Lifestyle Marketing: Approach focused on aligning product branding with consumers' lifestyle preferences rather than merely selling clothing.
Cultural Shifts: The California leisurewear industry redefined masculinity, integrating aspects from Hollywood culture, rugged Western influences, and suburban informality.
Conflicts on Masculinity: Some scholars perceived a tension in views of masculinity during this period, with leisurewear appealing particularly to suburban family men.
Men's Wear Manufacturers of Los Angeles: Formed in 1934 to take on competition from established cities like Chicago and New York.
First Fashion Show: The Sportswear Round Up in 1942, marking significant engagement in lifestyle marketing.
Expansion of Marketing Strategies: Shift towards promoting the lifestyle surrounding leisurewear rather than just the garments themselves.
Economic Boom: War efforts boosted the industrial capacity and demographic growth in Los Angeles.
Adaptation of Casual Styles: Soldiers returning home reinforced the acceptance of casual styles, mingling workwear with leisure apparel.
California's Styling: Marketing efforts connected the "Made in California" label with concepts of youth, leisure, and modern masculinity.
Advertising Themes: Ads promoted California lifestyle, featuring bright colors and casual fabrics that reflected carefree living.
Joint Marketing Initiatives: Collaboration among manufacturers to create cohesive marketing strategies and promote California’s identity.
Naturalization of the Californian Lifestyle: Marketing linked clothing with the state's sunny, outdoor lifestyle, reinforcing the appeal of leisurewear.
Cultural Appropriation in Marketing: Advertisements used iconic imagery associated with local culture while simplifying the identities of represented ethnicities.
Impacts on Gender Perception: Advertising maintained heterosexual ideals, avoiding deeper implications of male objectification or homoeroticism.
Symbolism in Men's Clothing: The casual styles associated with California leisurewear led to broader changes in how men viewed their clothing.
Legacy: California's leisurewear marketing facilitated a major transformation in American men's fashion, blending lifestyle aspirations with wardrobe choices.
Comparative sales growth between men’s and women’s fashion indicates the rising influence and leadership of California in the sportswear sector.
The strategies implemented by West Coast manufacturers laid foundational shifts that have evolved into contemporary marketing practices in fashion.