Colonized countries often have a head of state influenced by monarchy, for example, Canada.
There is a ceremonial figure (like a governor general) who is not actively involved in government.
Acts as the first among equals, leading cabinet discussions and holding significant power.
Can make changes in the cabinet and is often central to policy decisions.
The British Cabinet typically steps back from decisions made by the Prime Minister.
Political Party Dynamics: Emphasizes party loyalty; members who disagree may lose their position.
German Parliamentary System: The Chancellor is the political leader and can only be removed by a special vote which requires a replacement candidate, promoting stability.
Influence of Opposition: In minority governments, working with other parties is key to passing laws. Examples include the 1997 situation with a conservative president and socialist leader.
Majority Stability: Trends indicate a focus on individual personalities in systems with stable majorities.
Executive Terms: Presidential terms are fixed; calling for new elections can be expensive.
Hands-On: Example - Jimmy Carter who managed everything but was seen as exhausting.
Hands-Off: Example - Ronald Reagan who delegated tasks and often missed essential matters.
Impact of Bureaucracy: Bureaucrats are vital for carrying out policies, but this can lead to control issues and corruption.
Cultural Influences: Different cultures affect how bureaucracies function, for instance, French bureaucracy emphasizes specialized training.
Corruption Dynamics: More bureaucracy can lead to higher corruption risks due to complex regulations.
Comparisons Across Countries:
Germany: Bureaucracy is cautious due to historical concerns about loyalty and competence.
British: Claims to be neutral but operates under strict control prioritizing national interests.
Japan: Powerful bureaucracy that resists electoral pressures, rooted in strong traditions.
Knowledge and Power: Bureaucrats possess extensive knowledge important for law enforcement, though they lack democratic accountability.
Real-Life Implications: Variability in power can stall political progress, affecting policy responsiveness and innovation.