Cognitive psychology seeks to comprehend the nature of these impairments and develop cognitive models that can account for the varied patterns of language deficits encountered in clinical settings, informing both diagnosis and potential therapies. The lecture will delve into specific language impairments—including picture naming, reading, and repetition—illustrating how cognitive models can elucidate the underlying mechanisms of these deficits.
The discussion begins with picture naming, identified as a fundamental cognitive process that is commonly overlooked. Despite the ease with which individuals can name a vast number of objects and people, this task is complex and can be disrupted due to brain injuries. Jeremy emphasizes the continuum of responses to object naming, where individuals may display varying degrees of familiarity with an object—from total lack of recognition to successfully retrieving its name. This is highlighted through an example of a rare object (a sextant), which illustrates how individuals can have partial knowledge about an object but struggle to access its name, a phenomenon clinically described as anomia.
Anomia, defined as the inability to retrieve names despite possessing knowledge of the objects, is commonly seen in patients who have experienced strokes resulting in aphasia, a broad term for language impairments following brain injury. Patients with anomia often express frustration at knowing the answer yet being unable to articulate it. They may respond positively to phonological cues, indicating that while the complete retrieval fails, parts of the information remain accessible. This experience of cognitive retrieval disruption underscores how cognitive impairments can help in mapping out the processes involved in normal cognition.
Jeremy presents an illustrative video of a patient suffering from severe anomia due to semantic dementia, where the patient is asked to name pictures. Through this case study, it becomes apparent that even when patients cannot produce the exact name, they often retain categorical knowledge and may occasionally benefit from phonological prompts. This serves to illustrate that although some information may be lost, it is not an absolute loss and provides important insights into the cognitive challenges faced by individuals with such impairments.
The lecture draws parallels between the patients' experiences and a common cognitive phenomenon known as the "tip of the tongue" experience, where individuals feel the struggle of trying to recall a word that feels just out of reach. Research by Brown and McNeil indicates that this experience occurs quite frequently, revealing how retrieval difficulties particularly manifest with proper names and how individuals may provide related information when they cannot access the desired term. This leads to the observation that the cognitive struggle to retrieve names intensifies under pressure, often resolved later when the individual is relaxed.
Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that the exaggerated experiences of patients with anomia can shine a light on the everyday challenges faced by individuals without brain injuries as they navigate memory and language. This understanding serves a dual purpose: supporting the development of cognitive models to explain these language impairments as well as deepening our comprehension of normal cognitive functioning. The next segment of the lecture promises to outline a basic cognitive model of naming that explains the occurrence of anomia within a framework that illustrates cognitive processes in a structured manner, guided by standard box and arrow models prevalent in cognitive psychology studies. This theoretical framework serves to lay the foundation for future discussions on cognitive impairments and therapeutic approaches.