The multisensory model suggests that memory and perception are informed by multiple sensory channels, emphasizing the integration of information from different modalities.
This contrasts with the single store model, which generally views memory as a more isolated, activity-based process.
Types of Evidence
Subjective Evidence
Active Memory Estimation:
Individuals can estimate how active their long-term memory feels.
This feeling can be gauged by reflecting on specific memories that may come to mind based on sensory triggers.
Subjective Experience of Memory Activation:
People may evaluate the vividness of memories, which can vary in strength based on sensory stimulation prior to memory recall.
This subjective assessment indicates that memory may not just be about retrieval but also about sensory experiences influencing the recall process.
Experimental Evidence
Cross-Modal Integration:
Research studies demonstrate that engaging multiple senses (e.g., visual and auditory stimuli) can enhance memory recall.
Experiments showing that items learned through varied sensory channels (like watching a video and listening to a lecture) are remembered better than those from a single source highlight this point.
Neuroscientific Evidence:
Brain imaging studies have shown that memory tasks activate related sensory areas, suggesting that memories are stored in a multisensory context.
Neural correlates for multisensory integration have been found, indicating that memory representation is linked to how information is gathered and experienced through different senses.
Conclusion
Evidence supporting the multisensory model includes both subjective feelings of memory activation and direct experimental findings.
The model illustrates the complexity of memory systems, showing they are not purely activity-based but also significantly influenced by sensory modalities.