SR

Week 6 Workplace Psychology: Teams And Teamwork

Learning Objectives

  • Level of Analysis: Understand the various levels at which human behavior is analyzed in organizational psychology: micro (individual), meso (team), and macro (organization).
  • Concept of Teamwork: Explore what teamwork entails and its significance in organizational settings.
  • Types of Teams: Identify different types of teams and their specific functions including problem resolution, creative, tactical, ad hoc, virtual, cross-functional, and multi-team systems.
  • Team Development: Discuss how teams and their members evolve over time following models like Tuckman's stages of team development.
  • Team Structure and Processes: Understand how teams are structured and how they function, including decision-making processes, communication patterns, and group dynamics.
  • Decision-Making and Mental Models: Examine how teams make decisions and share mental frameworks.
  • Problematic Team Functioning: Analyze reasons why teams might struggle or fail.

Types of Teams

  • Basic Types:
    • Problem Resolution Teams: High-trust focus on solving specific temporary issues.
    • Creative Teams: Innovate and develop new products or services.
    • Tactical Teams: Execute well-defined plans, focusing on clarity and specific roles (e.g., surgical teams).
    • Ad hoc Teams: Temporary teams formed for specific problem-resolution or tactical tasks.
    • Virtual Teams: Teams that collaborate electronically.
    • Cross-Functional Teams: Composed of members from different departments (e.g., a surgical team with various specialists).
    • Multi-Team Systems: Interdependent teams working toward system-wide goals, involving multiple organizations (e.g., emergency services).

Work Group vs Work Team

  • Work Group:
    • Individuals see themselves as a social entity but may not have interdependent tasks.
  • Work Team:
    • Members share a common goal, have interdependent functions, distinctive roles, and a coordinated approach to achieve objectives. High synergy is aimed to deliver greater outcomes than individual contributions alone.

Team Life Cycle (Tuckman's Model)

  • Stages:
    1. Forming: Orientation phase; members introduce themselves and set objectives and roles.
    2. Storming: Conflicts may arise as the true dynamics begin to surface; need for direction and support is critical.
    3. Norming: Establishing trust and understanding roles, bringing team members together; focus on collective goals.
    4. Performing: Members are motivated, knowledge of roles is clear, and a high level of performance is achieved.
    5. Adjourning: The team disbands after achieving goals; members may experience a sense of loss.

Team Structure

  • Triad Model: Roles within teams can be categorized based on three parameters:
    • Skill Differentiation: High/low skill diversity on tasks.
    • Authority Differentiation: Decision-making power distribution.
    • Temporal Stability: Duration members remain together.

Factors Affecting Team Effectiveness

  • Individual Characteristics: Skills, abilities, diversity, personality traits, demographic differences.
  • Organizational Context: Support, culture, operational clarity, autonomy.
  • Process Variables: Effective communication, cohesiveness, leadership characteristics, well-defined norms, and decision-making processes.

Groupthink vs. Apollo Syndrome

  • Groupthink: Harmonious decision-making that overrides realistic appraisal of alternatives, often due to high cohesiveness. Symptoms include pressure to conform, invulnerability, and stereotypical views of outsiders.
  • Apollo Syndrome: Highly capable teams struggle with decision-making due to individual agendas, active debate leading to negativity, and conflicting interests.

Social Loafing

  • Definition: Reduced effort in a group setting compared to when working alone, stemming from deindividuation, output equity perceptions, and lack of clear performance standards.
  • Mitigation: Increase identifiability of individual contributions, enhance group cohesiveness, set clear standards, and foster intergroup competition to discourage loafing.

Trust in Teams

  • Components of Trust: Ability, benevolence, and integrity are essential for fostering trustworthy relationships in teams which are critical for effective collaboration.
    • Trust Propensity: Individual willingness to rely on others based on prior experiences and perceptions.