Indiana University RAD
ILLiad TN1902256
Journal Title: Sharia Compliant
Volume: Not available
Issue: Not available
Month/Year: 2018
Pages: Chapter 1
Article Author: Rumee Ahmed
Article Title: Chapter 1
Call #: KBP144 .A46 2018
Location: B-WELLS STACKS
Note from Sarah Imhoff: Sycamore Hall 233, Bloomington, IN 47405
Copyright Notice: This material may be protected by US copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
Definition and Understanding of Sharia:
Sharia, often politicized, lacks a singular definition; it's described variably across political lines.
Perspectives include:
Ancient, unchanging law vs. an ideal for good living.
Central to Muslim life vs. peripheral to it.
Labelled as oppressive or liberating.
Objective sources for understanding sharia:
Islamic legal texts
Muslim beliefs and practices
Islamic Legal Texts vs. Everyday Practices:
Legal texts provide insight but differ significantly, complicating a unified definition of sharia.
Perspectives of notable scholars:
Ibn Taymiyya (1328): Sharia is ancient and unchanging, compliant with the Prophet Muhammad.
Ibn al-Qayyim (1350): Views sharia as flexible, focusing on justice and welfare.
Divergent Interpretations:
Legal scholars’ texts can affirm opposing views.
Sources remain ambiguous; while some assert sharia's rigidity, others highlight its adaptability.
Legal texts alone do not yield a definitive understanding of sharia.
Many Muslims do not engage with texts; everyday beliefs and practices often diverge from elite interpretations.
Public surveys reveal a dichotomy where large support exists for the idea of sharia but minimal adherence in daily practices.
Poll data reveal:
Approximately 70% of Muslims believe sharia should be the law of the land. Yet, practical observance often lacks.
Contradictions in Practice:
Support for democracy and religious freedom exists alongside support for sharia.
Public indifference to personal adherence to sharia highlights a gap between belief and practice.
Different Definitions Among Muslims:
There are no universally accepted definitions, leading to highly individualized interpretations of sharia.
Anecdotal Observations:
Personal anecdotes from scholars illustrate varied experiences with sharia's role in daily life.
Over the last century, sharia has been constructed within political frameworks often emphasizing state law.
Historical experiences of colonialism and the rise of Muslim nation-states have shaped prevailing discourses about sharia.
Early Muslim Expansion:
The rapid growth and territorial acquisition of Muslim governance.
Colonial Impact:
Transition to European colonialism shifts views on legal authority and governance practices.
European colonizers developed systems of legal governance that often conflicted with traditional Islamic practices.
Legal Categorization:
The stratification of laws for civil and criminal matters often sidelined Islamic scholars.
Attempts to create codified laws reflected colonial interests rather than indigenous practices.
Colonial methodologies often co-opted traditional Islamic texts for civil governance, fundamentally altering their original intent.
Emerging Ideologies:
Post-colonial movements invoked sharia for socio-political righteousness.
Sharia became a rallying cry against colonial oppression, aligning with anticolonial narratives focused on justice.
The evolving landscape of post-colonial legal systems led to new interpretations and expectations surrounding sharia.
The theoretical implications of establishing sharia as a law observe significant shifts across various societies.
New nation-states began integrating sharia principles into their constitutions, reflecting a growing interest in governance based on Islamic law.
Contemporary political discourse often frames debates around sharia in legalistic terms, suggesting rigid implementations that overlook diverse realities.
The continued evolution of sharia reflects both aspirations for justice and socio-political realities on the ground.
The discourse surrounding sharia must move beyond fixed legal interpretations and recognize the fluid nature of its practice in daily life.
Myth 1: Single Official Sharia - Numerous interpretations coexist, often contrasting one another based on scholarly perspectives.
Myth 2: Sharia Never Changes - Sharia evolves to address contemporary needs, navigating between ancient practice and present-day applications.
Myths perpetuate oversimplification; acknowledging diversity and complexity in sharia discussions promotes understanding.
Clarifying distinctions between sharia as an ideal and Islamic law as a human endeavor enhances discussions about legal interpretations.
Debates about sharia have increasingly become democratized, allowing varied voices, including those of gender advocates, to emerge.
Islamic law is often more complex than just relying on these texts; much is derived from scholarly deliberations.
Law's enforcement and understanding reflect cultural, social, and personal nuances not limited by strict adherence to religious laws.