Concern regarding environmental degradation has risen due to:
Population growth
Urbanization
Industrialization
Environmental protection has costs, especially for businesses.
There is a tension between increasing profits and the need to safeguard the environment.
Originated in England, addressing pollution such as dirt, smoke, and toxic substances.
Today, individuals harmed by pollution utilize common law for damages and injunctions.
Nuisance Doctrine: Liability arises when property use unreasonably interferes with another's enjoyment of their property.
Courts balance pollution harm against the costs of remediation.
Example: A factory causing smoke may lead to monetary damages rather than shutting down if it's vital to the local economy.
Private Nuisance: Requires proof of distinct harm beyond the general public's suffering.
Public authorities may intervene for public nuisances.
Negligence: Claims arise from businesses failing to exercise reasonable care, leading to foreseeable injuries.
Strict Liability: Applicable to ultra-hazardous activities; injuries do not require proving lack of care.
Toxic torts: Lawsuits for personal injuries from hazardous substances (e.g., asbestos, radiation).
Environmental regulation is enforced at federal, state, and local levels.
States have laws to protect the environment, regulating emissions and waste disposal.
Local regulations include zoning laws and methods of waste disposal.
Local governments can modify development plans to minimize environmental impact.
Major federal statutes aim to address air, water, and land pollution.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plays a primary role in enforcement.
Citizens can sue for enforcement when agencies fail, but must meet standing requirements.
The case involves the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issuing permits for taking migratory birds at JFK Airport due to safety risks.
Legal challenge on whether FWS could issue emergency-take permits without defining specific species listed on the permit.
Court ruling: The FWS's authority under regulatory provisions did not violate the law.
Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act: Prevents discharge of refuse in navigable waterways.
Clean Air Act: Regulates air pollution from vehicles and industries.
Clean Water Act: Regulates point-source discharges into waters.
Endangered Species Act: Protects threatened species.
Safe Drinking Water Act: Sets drinking water standards.
Toxic Substances Control Act: Regulates hazardous chemical use.
Superfund: Provides a framework for clean-up of hazardous waste sites.
Required for federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
Must analyze environmental impacts, alternatives, and irreversible effects.
Mobile Sources: Emission standards for vehicles are regularly updated.
Stationary Sources: Mostly implemented by state and local governments.
Goals: Control hazardous air pollutants and set maximum permissible levels.
Violations can incur significant penalties.
O'Malley was convicted under the Clean Air Act for improper asbestos handling without a license.
The court upheld the definition and obligations under the Act, indicating ignorance of specific regulations is not a defense.
Establishes a system for regulating discharges from point sources via the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
Goals: Safe swimming, wildlife protection, and eliminating pollutant discharges.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA): Regulates hazardous waste management.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA): Establishes the Superfund program for cleaning hazardous waste sites and identifies responsible parties.
Ongoing litigation and updated regulations reflect the dynamic relationship between environmental protection, business interests, and public health.