A basic assumption of a positivist philosophy is that it is possible for a human geographer to conduct research objectively, without being affected by her or his personal beliefs about the world and the way it ought to be. Does this sound reasonable?
A basic assumption of Marxist philosophy is that, rather than strive for objectivity, it is essential that a human geographer conduct research with a specific ideological agenda in mind. Does this sound reasonable?
Human geographers who subscribe to one of the several versions of a humanist philosophy acknowledge that the research they conduct is not easily verified by others. Does this matter?
Philosophy is critical to the beginning geographer → philosophical perspective explains our specific content, concepts, and analytical techniques
Facts, concepts, and other disciplines in human geography are logically unrelated
@@Much geographic work is guided by a specific philosophical viewpoint@@
Positivism and the quantitative procedures associated with it have a tendency to exclude the individual human element from research, preferring to focus on aggregate data; critics consider such work to be dehumanized human geography. We might call it a geography of people.
Humanism, postmodernism, and the qualitative procedures associated with these, on the other hand, emphasize the integration of researcher and research, thus generating a geography with people.
Marxism, along with feminism, aspires to solve problems associated with inequality and lack of social justice, thus aiming to be a geography for people.
For some human geographers, positivism is a very attractive philosophy
It is rigorous, formal, clear and straightforward
Positivist philosophy was introduced into human geography relatively late (1953)
Closely associated with quantitative methods and theory developed during the 1960s
Spatial analysis approach
Positivism was controversial because it directly challenged the regional approach that was dominant at the time
Positivism contends that the study of human phenomena can be objective/humanism says that it cannot
Answering no → positivistic / Answering yes → humanistic
Classic humanistic philosophies place some emphasis on individuals while traditionally we have focused on groups
Most human geographers feel the emphasis on individuals is inappropriate
Groups are defined by culture, religion, language, ethnicity, gender, or sexuality
\
\
\