At the end of this session you will be able to:
•Discuss the types of research question for which qualitative data are especially suited
•Develop an awareness of the different types of qualitative data collection and their relevance to practice research
•Discuss methods of sampling for qualitative studies and how they differ from quantitative approaches
•Discuss the practicalities and problems associated with collecting qualitative data
What is qualitative research?
collects and analyses words not numbers
aims to understand the world from the participants POV:
experiences
knowledge and understanding
meaning
explanation
Key features:
Aims | Exploring, understanding, interpreting and mapping |
Research questions | ‘How’ and ‘why’ questions (not ‘how many?’) |
Data collection | Open and in-depth Flexible and responsive to the participant & the context |
Data yielded | Rich, detailed & extensive content, but fewer participants |
Analysis | Does not aim to measure frequency Mapping the range & diversity of perspectives Often seeks to explain as well as describe |
Researcher | Their experience is integral to the process Transparent and reflexive about their preconceptions |
They are good for looking into:
understanding ‘lay’ or clinical behaviour
e.g. what triggers people to actually see a doctor
participants perceptions of quality or appropriateness
views on new services/policies
organisational culture/managing change
why aren’t the research findings implemented
evaluating complex policy initiatives
‘taken for granted’ phenomena
Qualitative data collection methods
observation
interviews
focus groups
Observation collection method:
data collected as events occur at study site
observe and record details of events
e.g. Observation of pharmacists and counter assistants providing OTC medicines advice: Do they use WWHAM questions? How do they handle situations where customer does not engage?
systematic detailed observation of talk and behaviour in it’s natural environment
Types of observation:
participant: immersion of researcher in social setting - not very common in health research
non-participant: researcher not participating
discrete - no interference with normal activity
first hand - not reliant on individual report of behaviour
hawthorne effect - validity affected by observer presence
Types of research data collected:
structured: observe to a data collection form (also known as a schedule)
obtain frequency, time, duration and who was involved etc
semi-structured: prompts to collect data on pre-specified concepts with space of open-ended notes
unstructured: record behaviour of participants and develop narrative accounts
The Need to Pilot:
need to gather the right data for the research question but must be workable
pilot locations: can you see, hear? is it unobstructive?
Limitations
behavioural changes if people know they are being observed
observer bias
see what you wanna see
become tired/bored
assimilating into the group - adopt their norms
Observation interview focus groups
Structured
quantitative questionnaire
researcher-led
closed questions/pre-coded/short answers
Semi-structured or unstructured
captures data about attitudes, behaviour, views
participant led, standardised, minimal variation, keeping to question order
open questions first, focus if needed/lengthy answers
interview schedule topic guide
Key Skills for interviewing
active listening
open questions
probing
Active Listening
give the participants your complete attention:
shut out distractions
hear what they are saying
show attention
observe body language
audio record to allow for you to focus on what is being said
Open questions:
5Ws and How
Cannot be answered in just a few words
short and clear questions
neutral non-leading questions
Probing questions:
participants’ first answers rarely tell us the whole story
probes are short, open questions used to elicit more data
an essential for getting the complex details that an interview should give
Types of probe
Explanatory | Why? What was the reason for that? |
Clarification | What do you mean by…? What’s your understanding of…? |
Impact | What effect did that have? What difference has that made to you? |
Scoping | Was there anything else? In what other ways…? Going back to what you mentioned earlier… |
Challenging | Earlier you said X, but from what you’ve just told me… |
The topic guide
An agenda for conducting the interview. Has topics and issues to cover
Features of the topic guide
flexible and interactive
can adapt questioning and order to meet circumstances
gently ease respondent from social to deeper level
progress from the general to specific
can insert prompts and probes
use respondent’s language
The topic guide:
introduction - study objectives and purpose, duration, confidentiality
topics and sub topics - open questions and probe, begin easily and then lead to more difficult questions before ending with easier questions again
revise after pilot if needed
Phone/Online interviews
little evidence that face-to-face interviews
may be shorter
practical - cheaper and more convenient
helps overcome reservation
anonymous
lack of non-verbal cues - cannot see distress/anxiety
Conducting a good interview
clear objectives - plan ahead
comprehensive and familiar topic guide
good questioning
pace the interview
avoid interrupting
active listening
comfortability
suitable location
Focus Groups
interaction between respondents
enables people to explore and clarify their views in ways that would be less easy in one-to-one interview
stimulates wide-ranging discussion and generates comprehensive list of issues
can produce patterns of interaction
Size:
6 to 8 people
over-inviting is smart since some people may not turn up
The researchers:
conducted by a moderator/facilitator
responsible for running the session and steering the discussion
achieving participation from everyone
second researcher
doesn’t take part in discussion
takes notes and assists with smooth running and admin
monitors who is contributing
audio recorder
refreshments
Conducting a focus group:
introduce research team
thanks for coming and taking part
goals
ground rules
format
Topic guide:
start recorder and launch into the topic guide
encourage participants to clarify their view
explore why people think that they do
explore differences between members
draw to end
Level of facilitator involvement
not too intrusive
not too strcutred
allow respondents to steer but keep to focus
respond to points raised that are particularly relevant to the research
minimal intervention unless
group is struggling
remind people to talk one at a time
don’t allow people to dominate
Ethical Considerations
people may get upset/angry
people may want to stop/leave
cannot guarantee confidentiality
Focus group strengths:
Can highlight cultural values or group norms
Does not discriminate against people who can’t read or write
Participation from those reluctant to be interviewed 1:1
Can encourage contributions from those who think they have nothing to say
Focus group weaknesses:
Reticent speakers may not offer views
Reluctance to express opposing or sensitive views
Dominant speakers can narrow and direct content
Less opportunity to explore individual views
Risk of poor turn out
More complicated & expensive to organise
Difficult to analyse
Interviews vs Focus Group
Interviews | Focus groups | |
Data | In-depth, personal accounts Understand issues in detail | Shaped by group interaction Generate ideas/solutions Understand differences within group |
Subject matter | Complex, private or sensitive | Social attitudes Abstract/conceptual topics Creative thinking |
Practical | Participants who are less willing to travel | Population clustered geographically Shared background |
Ethical | Participants at risk of harm by group setting | Participants likely to be supported by group setting |
Key Terms:
Population: people the study is about
Sampling: drawn from the population
Convenience: easily accessible & ready to participate
Representative: findings applied to wider population
Purposive: individuals that fulfill certain conditions
Sampling:
purposive
a form of non-random sampling where the participants are deliberatly selected
Qualitative sample sizes:
Usually small – typically:
<50 interviews
6-12 focus groups
Larger samples are unnecessary:
Aim is to map views, not count them
Often, sample until you reach saturation
No new information or themes are observed in new interviews/focus groups
Consider how varied your population is