Semester 1 #2 Notes
Supernaturalism
X is good because God commands it
Are actions right or wrong because of Gods command or does it follow the inherent good or badness of the thing?
Focus question
If God told us to murder someone, would it be good?
Do we do things for the goodness of it, or do we do it because God wants us to do it
Divine command theory is when God says something is OK, that means it is ok
God commands that we recognize goodness
Things can be good in themselves
God does not command US to be truthful, therefore we must figure out what is good and what is bad
Commandments are not necessary for those where people cannot see good things
Natural law theory
Goodness can be found my reason because of the nature of things
There is rational and natural law
There is value and purpose in everything
Laws of nature describe how things are but also what they ought to be
When God says something is good, it is good forever, it doesn't change
PErspectivism
Norms can be perscribed
Miranda and the soggy pie
Whether or not a given act meets a standard
Ethical theories need to
allow us freedom to make out own moral judgements
we can know and apply the standard ourselves
show us how to make moral judgements in a rational way
not making arbitary decisions but basing them on objective statements of differences in the things
“realitive worjt” is valuable to know
Moral judgements are a kind of prescription
They are an “imperative”
Indictaive: the door is open, describes a state of affairs
Imperative close te door- requires and action to be undertaken
making similer evaluations about similar cases- we look for continuity
keeping our moral beliefs in harmony with how we live and how we want others to live
similar actions ought to be done
a pie must not have a soggy bottom
Moral reasoning asks us to be informed, imaginative, and consistent
If you hit someone then you deserve to be hit for moral consistency
Prescriptivism does not agree that moral judgements are “true” or “known to be true”
There are no moral truths
There is something good about havng pre-defines pulic standards
They aloow us to discus the relative merits of standard
Methods of evaluating things on basis of a standard
Allow us to build consensus as to the relative godness
Alow us to understanddiferences and disagrements a to the merits of aspects of standards
standards can be changed
elp us to be consistent, impartial, and fair
Supernaturalism
X is good because God commands it
Are actions right or wrong because of Gods command or does it follow the inherent good or badness of the thing?
Focus question
If God told us to murder someone, would it be good?
Do we do things for the goodness of it, or do we do it because God wants us to do it
Divine command theory is when God says something is OK, that means it is ok
God commands that we recognize goodness
Things can be good in themselves
God does not command US to be truthful, therefore we must figure out what is good and what is bad
Commandments are not necessary for those where people cannot see good things
Natural law theory
Goodness can be found my reason because of the nature of things
There is rational and natural law
There is value and purpose in everything
Laws of nature describe how things are but also what they ought to be
When God says something is good, it is good forever, it doesn't change
PErspectivism
Norms can be perscribed
Miranda and the soggy pie
Whether or not a given act meets a standard
Ethical theories need to
allow us freedom to make out own moral judgements
we can know and apply the standard ourselves
show us how to make moral judgements in a rational way
not making arbitary decisions but basing them on objective statements of differences in the things
“realitive worjt” is valuable to know
Moral judgements are a kind of prescription
They are an “imperative”
Indictaive: the door is open, describes a state of affairs
Imperative close te door- requires and action to be undertaken
making similer evaluations about similar cases- we look for continuity
keeping our moral beliefs in harmony with how we live and how we want others to live
similar actions ought to be done
a pie must not have a soggy bottom
Moral reasoning asks us to be informed, imaginative, and consistent
If you hit someone then you deserve to be hit for moral consistency
Prescriptivism does not agree that moral judgements are “true” or “known to be true”
There are no moral truths
There is something good about havng pre-defines pulic standards
They aloow us to discus the relative merits of standard
Methods of evaluating things on basis of a standard
Allow us to build consensus as to the relative godness
Alow us to understanddiferences and disagrements a to the merits of aspects of standards
standards can be changed
elp us to be consistent, impartial, and fair