knowt logo

Semester 1 #2 Notes

Supernaturalism

Supernaturalism

  • X is good because God commands it

  • Are actions right or wrong because of Gods command or does it follow the inherent good or badness of the thing?

    • Focus question

      • If God told us to murder someone, would it be good?

  • Do we do things for the goodness of it, or do we do it because God wants us to do it

  • Divine command theory is when God says something is OK, that means it is ok

  • God commands that we recognize goodness

  • Things can be good in themselves

  • God does not command US to be truthful, therefore we must figure out what is good and what is bad

  • Commandments are not necessary for those where people cannot see good things

Natural law theory

  • Goodness can be found my reason because of the nature of things

  • There is rational and natural law

  • There is value and purpose in everything

  • Laws of nature describe how things are but also what they ought to be

  • When God says something is good, it is good forever, it doesn't change

PErspectivism

  • Norms can be perscribed

  • Miranda and the soggy pie

  • Whether or not a given act meets a standard

  • Ethical theories need to

    • allow us freedom to make out own moral judgements

      • we can know and apply the standard ourselves

    • show us how to make moral judgements in a rational way

      • not making arbitary decisions but basing them on objective statements of differences in the things

        • “realitive worjt” is valuable to know

  • Moral judgements are a kind of prescription

  • They are an “imperative”

  • Indictaive: the door is open, describes a state of affairs

  • Imperative close te door- requires and action to be undertaken

  • making similer evaluations about similar cases- we look for continuity

  • keeping our moral beliefs in harmony with how we live and how we want others to live

  • similar actions ought to be done

    • a pie must not have a soggy bottom

  • Moral reasoning asks us to be informed, imaginative, and consistent

  • If you hit someone then you deserve to be hit for moral consistency

  • Prescriptivism does not agree that moral judgements are “true” or “known to be true”

  • There are no moral truths

  • There is something good about havng pre-defines pulic standards

  • They aloow us to discus the relative merits of standard

  • Methods of evaluating things on basis of a standard

  • Allow us to build consensus as to the relative godness

  • Alow us to understanddiferences and disagrements a to the merits of aspects of standards

  • standards can be changed

  • elp us to be consistent, impartial, and fair

Semester 1 #2 Notes

Supernaturalism

Supernaturalism

  • X is good because God commands it

  • Are actions right or wrong because of Gods command or does it follow the inherent good or badness of the thing?

    • Focus question

      • If God told us to murder someone, would it be good?

  • Do we do things for the goodness of it, or do we do it because God wants us to do it

  • Divine command theory is when God says something is OK, that means it is ok

  • God commands that we recognize goodness

  • Things can be good in themselves

  • God does not command US to be truthful, therefore we must figure out what is good and what is bad

  • Commandments are not necessary for those where people cannot see good things

Natural law theory

  • Goodness can be found my reason because of the nature of things

  • There is rational and natural law

  • There is value and purpose in everything

  • Laws of nature describe how things are but also what they ought to be

  • When God says something is good, it is good forever, it doesn't change

PErspectivism

  • Norms can be perscribed

  • Miranda and the soggy pie

  • Whether or not a given act meets a standard

  • Ethical theories need to

    • allow us freedom to make out own moral judgements

      • we can know and apply the standard ourselves

    • show us how to make moral judgements in a rational way

      • not making arbitary decisions but basing them on objective statements of differences in the things

        • “realitive worjt” is valuable to know

  • Moral judgements are a kind of prescription

  • They are an “imperative”

  • Indictaive: the door is open, describes a state of affairs

  • Imperative close te door- requires and action to be undertaken

  • making similer evaluations about similar cases- we look for continuity

  • keeping our moral beliefs in harmony with how we live and how we want others to live

  • similar actions ought to be done

    • a pie must not have a soggy bottom

  • Moral reasoning asks us to be informed, imaginative, and consistent

  • If you hit someone then you deserve to be hit for moral consistency

  • Prescriptivism does not agree that moral judgements are “true” or “known to be true”

  • There are no moral truths

  • There is something good about havng pre-defines pulic standards

  • They aloow us to discus the relative merits of standard

  • Methods of evaluating things on basis of a standard

  • Allow us to build consensus as to the relative godness

  • Alow us to understanddiferences and disagrements a to the merits of aspects of standards

  • standards can be changed

  • elp us to be consistent, impartial, and fair

robot