AP

Baroque Roots, Post-Genre Voices: Caroline Shaw’s Partita and Kendrick Lamar’s DAMN.

Baroque “Partitas” and Dance-Suite Heritage

  • “Partita” in Baroque era
    • Used almost interchangeably with “suite” by J.S. Bach
    • Typical contents: ordered set of stylized dances (e.g., Allemande, Courante, Sarabande, Gigue)
    • Bach’s “partitas” are looser than his “suites,” but share core idea: multi-movement sequence of contrasting dance types
    • Violinists encounter the term via Bach’s three Partitas for Solo Violin (BWV 1002, 1004, 1006)
  • Naming conventions in Caroline Shaw’s work
    • Movements “Allemande,” “Sarabande,” and “Courante” consciously reference Baroque dance types
    • Fourth movement titled “Passacaglia” links to a different Baroque form (variation over a repeating bass line)
    • Historical note: Genuine Baroque dance suites rarely—if ever—contain a passacaglia movement, underscoring Shaw’s hybrid/modern approach

Caroline Shaw – “Partita for 8 Voices” (2012)

  • Composer background
    • American composer, singer-violinist; Pulitzer Prize winner (2013, youngest ever)
    • Member of vocal ensemble Roomful of Teeth (commissioning body/performers)
  • General stylistic traits
    • Blends classical, folk, non-Western, and extended vocal techniques
    • Interweaves spoken text from Sol LeWitt’s Wall Drawings with sung material
    • Applies dance-suite architecture as broad scaffold rather than strict template
  • Derivation of titles and movement sequence
    • Movement I “Allemande”
    • Movement II “Sarabande”
    • Movement III “Courante”
    • Movement IV “Passacaglia” (focus of transcript)

Movement IV “Passacaglia” – Detailed Walk-Through

  • Opening harmonic cycle
    • Ensemble articulates a repeating chord progression (acts like passacaglia basso ostinato)
    • Progression presented three successive times, each with a distinct timbre/technique:
    1. Warm, rounded, traditional choral tone
    2. Mid-pitch timbral shifts – bright ⇄ subtle in a single sustained note
    3. “Chest voice” derived from Bulgarian women’s choir style – piercing, aggressive attack followed by audible “gasping sigh” release
  • Layered textures & variation principle
    • Chord progression reiterated underneath oscillating figures sung by half the voices (creates polyrhythmic shimmer)
    • High melody in octaves emerges, then morphs into spoken excerpts from LeWitt’s Wall Drawing 305
  • Extended vocal techniques featured
    • Harmonic/overtone singing by male voices → singers manipulate low pedal fundamentals to project upper partials, painting a “rainbow” of whistle-like tones
    • Chest-voice/Bulgarian timbre, Korean pansori-inspired grit, non-linguistic sighs & gasps
  • Spoken-text cacophony
    • One-by-one, singers abandon melody to recite LeWitt text simultaneously → dense polyphonic speech texture
    • Isolated pitches from original progression intermittently “pierce” the speech cloud, maintaining structural memory of ostinato
  • Climax & resolution
    • Cacophony collapses into abrasive pansori-style growl that crescendos
    • Growl morphs back into opening chord; ensemble delivers one last full pass of the progression in chest voice
    • Begins a second final pass but is abruptly “derailed” by unexpected new chords (break from ostinato principle)
    • Overtone singing ornaments the closing harmony; piece ends on an unresolved, shimmering sonority
  • Significance
    • Demonstrates 21st-century reinterpretation of Baroque passacaglia: variation occurs via timbre, texture, and vocal technique—not just melody/harmony
    • Embeds conceptual art (LeWitt) and ethnically diverse vocal styles → underscores porousness of genre boundaries and art forms
    • Serves as model for post-genre composition embraced by Pulitzer committee (Shaw won 2013 Prize for this work)

2018 Pulitzer Prize for Music – Contestants and Decision

  • Three finalists (descending order of “conventionality”)
    • Michael Gilbertson – “Quartet” for string quartet
    • Ted Hearne – “Sound from the Bench” (cantata for chamber choir + 2 electric guitars & drums)
      • Text sources: U.S. Supreme Court rulings + ventriloquism manuals → critique of evolving legal concept of corporate personhood
    • Kendrick Lamar – album “DAMN.” (hip-hop) ← winner
  • Historical context
    • 75 yrs of Pulitzer tradition: award largely confined to “art”/classical music
    • 1997: first jazz winner (Wynton Marsalis) already expanded boundaries, yet still within conservatory sphere
  • Why Lamar’s win is groundbreaking
    • First recognition of a popular genre artist with mainstream chart success and commercial clout
    • Challenges assumptions that Pulitzers exist to elevate under-recognized, financially precarious “art” composers (Lamar did not need exposure/funding)
    • Asserts that hip-hop meets standards of artistic “greatness” and possesses evaluative criteria comparable to classical or jazz
    • Signals Pulitzer jury’s evolving value system; claims genre hierarchies may be obsolete (“good music is good music”)
  • Jury citation language (“virtuosic song collection unified by its vernacular authenticity…”) reveals tension: aims to speak classical vocabulary about hip-hop artifact

Kendrick Lamar – “DAMN.” (2017) & Track “DNA”

  • Production credits
    • Kendrick Lamar Duckworth – rapper, lyricist, conceptual architect
    • Michael Len Williams II (a.k.a. Mike WiLL Made-It) – producer; previous work with Gucci Mane, Rihanna, Beyoncé, Miley Cyrus
  • Genesis of “DNA”
    • Originated from beat Mike WiLL prepped for Gucci Mane; Lamar repurposed, recorded first half over beat
    • In studio, Lamar delivered a cappella verse → asked producer to “build a beat around his words” for second half
  • Two-part structure
    1. Part I – original beat, steady pulse, lyrical exposition
    2. Part II – mid-track disjunction
      • Pulse dissolves; sample: Geraldo Rivera (Fox News) quote: “Hip-hop has done more damage to young African Americans than racism…”
      • Lamar’s flow accelerates; rhythmic complexity intensifies; impression: rapper “battling the beat” (producer’s intention)
      • Beat becomes sparse; focus shifts to syncopated vocal–beat interplay, almost metrical free-fall
  • Thematic content
    • Recurrent motifs: Black identity (“I got loyalty, got royalty inside my DNA”), generational trauma, systemic disenfranchisement
    • Track functions as sonic rebuttal to Rivera and broader sociopolitical critiques of hip-hop
  • Musical characteristics
    • Dense internal rhyme, polysyllabic patterns, abrupt metric shifts
    • Production employs 808-style sub-bass, stuttering hi-hat triplets, layered ad-libs, glitchy samples in Part II
  • Importance for Pulitzer decision
    • “DNA” exemplified the album’s “rhythmic dynamism” and “vernacular authenticity” lauded by jury
    • Illustrates hip-hop’s capacity for narrative depth, formal ingenuity, and cultural critique

Greatness, Genre, and Future Directions

  • Pulitzer trajectory
    • 1900\text{s} → Exclusively classical
    • Late 20^{th} c. → Includes jazz (partly accepted as “art” via academia)
    • 21^{st} c. → Hip-hop recognized
  • Open questions
    • What genres will next be canonized? EDM? Global pop? Video-game scores?
    • Does “greatness” derive from notation-centric traditions or can oral/producer-based genres provide equally rigorous artistry?
  • Cross-genre practitioner paradigm
    • Increasing number of classical-trained musicians devoting equal energy to non-classical forms
    • View genre as palette rather than hierarchy; “good music everywhere” ethos

Example Ensemble Blurring Boundaries – Alarm Will Sound

  • New York City-based chamber orchestra (≈20 performers)
  • Origins: founded by Eastman School of Music students (e.g., Gavin Chuck, Alan Pierson)
  • Mission & repertoire
    • Perform contemporary classical, but also re-imagine electronic/techno, pop, and world music through acoustic instruments
    • Notable projects: acoustic arrangements of Aphex Twin electronica, collaborations with composer-producers (Tyshawn Sorey, Donnacha Dennehy, etc.)
  • Embodiment of post-genre values mirrored by Pulitzer’s widening scope

Conceptual & Practical Implications

  • Ethical/cultural
    • Recognizing popular genres in elite awards can validate experiences of marginalized communities represented in those genres
    • Industry equity: financial & institutional support may shift toward diverse creators
  • Academic
    • Curricula may increasingly incorporate hip-hop analysis, beat production, and cross-cultural vocal techniques (e.g., Bulgarian, pansori)
    • Questions of notation vs. recorded media in pedagogy; transcription methodologies
  • Real-world relevance
    • Composers & performers draw from global idioms (Shaw’s vocal techniques; Lamar’s sampling, Mike WiLL’s trap production)
    • Awards/funding bodies updating criteria can influence commissioning trends, programming, and public perception of “serious” art