Topic: Social Psychology: Helping and Prosocial Behaviour
Instructor: Dr. Steven McNair (he/him)
Contact: Steven.McNair@Glasgow.ac.uk
Attendance: Log attendance on Moodle in Psych 1B > Lectures > Lecture Attendance > Developmental and Social at 9am or 1pm.
Discuss different motivations for helping.
Define different types of prosocial behaviour, including altruism.
Evaluate whether ‘true’ altruism exists.
Discuss the bystander effect.
Conceptual motto: "Be the Change".
Prosocial behaviour: Actions valued positively by society.
Helping behaviour: Voluntary actions believed to benefit others.
Altruism: Acts that benefit others without expectation of personal gain.
Different frameworks to analyze helping:
Short-term vs long-term helping.
Person-based vs community-based.
Emergency vs non-emergency helping.
Influence of bystander effects.
Acts of heroism.
Evolutionary: Biological predisposition to help.
Social Influences: Norms, modeling, social exchange, empathy.
Assumptions: People help more when they are socially or emotionally invested.
People have innate tendencies for prosocial behaviour demonstrated in young children. (Hepach, Viash, & Tomasello, 2012)
Helping blood relatives increases the chances of gene propagation, but altruism extends to friends and strangers. (Warneken & Tomasello, 2009)
Paradox: Costs of actions towards one’s own children not explained by this stance.
Reciprocity: Helping others expecting a return favor.
Observe examples of reciprocity during the video and document within provided Microsoft Form until 2 minutes and 40 seconds.
Bringing snacks (e.g., bagels).
Assisting with personal items (e.g., polishing a briefcase).
Offering physical assistance (e.g., holding a door open).
Sharing knowledge (e.g., health tips).
Reciprocity: Return favors.
Social Responsibility: Duty to help those dependent on us.
Social Justice: Helping those who are deemed deserving of aid.
Learning to help by observing others.
Helps shape behavior based on external influences, teaching individuals what to do in emergencies.
Considers costs and rewards associated with helping.
Individual actions motivated by maximization of rewards and minimization of costs.
Increased likelihood of future reciprocal assistance.
Relief from witnessing distress (Eisenberg et al., 1989).
Improvement in self-image and self-worth (Hardy & Van Vugt, 2006).
Possible dangers, embarrassment, and time consumption impacting willingness to help.
Higher costs can lead to less helping behavior.
Participants viewed a fight and responded based on perceived danger of intervening.
Perceptions of threat affected willingness to intervene, distinguishing between stranger and domestic disputes.
The capacity to emotionally understand another's experience, essential for altruistic behavior.
Feeling empathy motivates us to help others without self-interest.
Participants observe a confederate's pain, varied by similarity and escape options.
Similarity induced more altruistic responses; less empathy led to egoistic behavior.
Empathy for similar others leads to altruistic behavior; absence of empathy leads to self-serving actions.
Empathy-Altruism Theory: Genuine altruism occurs only when empathy is felt.
Social Exchange Theory: Decisions to help are based on self-interest considerations.
Individual or group discussion on the existence of true altruism and justifications based on personal experiences and lecture content.
Exploration of how individuals respond in group situations when another needs help.
Discuss how the presence of others impacts the likelihood of helping, referencing Darley & Latané (1968).
Cumulative percentage data on helping behaviors relative to presumed bystander presence.
A misunderstanding among bystanders about whether help is required due to the lack of clear signals in ambiguous situations.
Notice the event.
Interpret the event as an emergency.
Assume responsibility.
Know how to help.
Decide to help.
In many observed conflicts, bystanders often intervene contrary to previous understandings of the effect.
Various motivations underlie helping behavior, from social norms to personal benefit considerations.
The existence of true altruism is debated within social exchange frameworks.
The bystander effect highlights the complexities of group dynamics in emergencies.
Prosocial behaviour, Helping behaviour, Altruism, Bystander effect, Social norms, Modelling, Social exchange, Empathy, Empathy-altruism theory, Reciprocity, Social responsibility, Social justice, Bystander intervention decision tree.
Wishing you success in the remainder of the semester.
Contact: Steven.McNair@Glasgow.ac.uk
Office hours and attendance log reminders.