Study of reptiles and amphibians, “herpes” meaning creeping or crawling thing
Carl Linnaeus called them foul creatures and why god did not make many of them
Combined these 2 groups in systema naturae in 1735
Amphibians and reptiles also grouped together for other reasons
Both ectothermic vertebrates
Ectothermy: energy derived from outside body
Ability to stay warm may be sacrificed to stay wet
Behavoiral thermoregulation like huddling and basking
Have ability to retain body temp once gained scha as cutting blood flow to limbs
Diff from cold blooded
Poikilothermy: irregular body temp
The smaller the less stable
Homeothermy: stable body temp
Amphibian biodiversity
Amphibious, “double life”
8715 species
74 families
Florida gofer frog!!! Profs fav
Salamanders, order Caudata “having tail”
Urodela “tail visible”
816 species, 10 families
Frogs+Toads, order Anura “without tail”
Salientia “jumping”
7678 species, 54 families (38 in 2012)
Caecilians, order Gymnophiona “naked snake”
Apoda “without food”
221 species, 10 families
Reptilian biodiversity
12060 species (dec 2022) my birthday :0
Turtles, order Testudines “ tortoises”
Chelonia
361 species, 14 families
Crocs+Alligators, order Crocodylia “lizard”
27 species, 3? Families
Tuatara, order Rhynchocephalia “nose head”
Order Sphenodontida “wedge tooth”
1 species, 1 family
Lizards, snakes, amphisbaenians, order Squamata “scaly”
Suborder (clade) amphisbaenia, worm lizards usually legless
202 species, 6 fam
Lizards, SUB order lacertilia (sauria) “paraphyletic”
7396 species, 37 fam (29 in 2012)
Snakes, SUB order serpentes (ophidia) “monophyletic”
4073 species, 30 families
Herpetology in Florida
3 primary ecoregions w high biodiversity
142 native species, 56 established non native species (2012)
Several famous herpetologists that have defined our history as a state
Ross Allen
Bill Haas
Archie Carr
Walter Auffenberg
“Doc” Erhart
Lora Smith
Intro to Cladistics and Systematics
History of bio organization
Carl Linnaeus (1600s)
Created modern taxonomic system that we use today
Used binomial nomenclature approach to classify organisms, first word genus CAPITAL second word species
Originally had 6 classes
Linnaeus’s 6 animal classes
Heart w 2 auricles, 2 ventricles, warm, red blood
Viviparous: mammalia
Oviparous: aves
Heart w 1 auricle, 1 ventricle, cold, red blooded
Lungs voluntary: amphibia
External gills: pisces
Heart w 1 auricle, 0 ventricles, cold, pus like blood
Have antennae: insecta
Have tentacles: vermes
Linnaeus ten split Amphibia into 3 orders, not reflective of our modern understanding
Reptiles
Lizards
Frogs
Serpentes
Snakes
Amphisbaenids
Nantes
Anything not in above groups
a species taxon as a group of organisms that can successfully interbreed and produce fertile offspring
26 different definitions of species
Most modern taxonomists tend to follow combo of phylogenetic and morphological approaches to generally classify organisms into clades
Which definition of species do we tend to use
Biological species concept: species is a group of interbreeding populations (or that have potential to interbreed) which is reproductively isolated from other such groups
Phylogenetic species concept: smallest monophyletic group of individuals distinguished by synapomorphies)
Morphological species concept: species recognized based on measurable physical differences
Some species hybridize well but are ecologically distinct, “cryptic” species, odd reproduction strategies (unisexual salamanders)
Taxonomy vs cladistics
Most modern herps use a cladistics based approach to understand bio organization
Traditional taxonomy
Taxas organized in categories
Levels imply relatedness of taxa, have no defined criteria
More of tradition than scientifically valid
Only what constitutes a species is defined
Cladistics: hypothetical depiction of evo relationships among taxa groups
Assuming things change over time, only organism is related yo another by a common organism, lineages generally bifurcate
If species bifurcate we do not see billions bc animals become extinct (99%), this comes as inability to compete
Phylogenetics: study of evolutionary history of species or group of species
Phylogeny: evolutionary history of species or group of species
Phylogenetic tree
Tips: taxa under study
Branches: genetic divergence of taxa from its most recent ancestor
Node: point where 1 group splits into 2+
Root: node that depicts oldest common ancestor of all taxa on tree
Sister taxa: groups with same recent common ancestor
Polytomy: node where 3+ branches emerge, implies lack of clarity on order that groups diverged
Monophyletic group: clade that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants
Paraphyletic group: includes an ancestral species and some but not all descendants
Polyphyletic group: includes members with diff recent common ancestors
What data splits these groups
Morphology:
Homology (homologous trait)-common traits due to shared evolution
Analogy (analogous trait)- common trait due to convergent evolution
genetics/genomics
How are new species created
Prevent gene flow
Isolating mechanisms
Geographical
Biological
Pre zygotic (differences in breeding seasons or courtship rituals)
Post zygotic (hybrid inviability or sterility)
Types of speciation
Allopatric: new species forms geographically apart from its ancestors
Parapatric: new species forms in a contiguous population
Divergence on each side on environmental boundary, hybrid zone, reinforcement-selection against mating with other form (pre zygotic)
Sympatric: new species emerges from within geographic range of its ancestors
Discussion: Anacondas
Am i reading a whole lot of nothing rn?
Debating on how to properly name anacondas taxonomically vs nomenclaturely
Taking into account ethical and societal concerns
Immortalized due to large size and presence in hollywood movies in 19th century led to multiple taxon names
Rivas et al revealed small diff in species but lacked clear species hypothesis and relied on insufficient evidence
mtDNA not enough, describing new species based solely on mitochondrial divergence is inappropriate even considered scientific malpractice
Paial et al and puillandre provided excellent workflow suggestions w mtDNA as hypothesis that can be tested with nuclear genetic markers or morphology
Availability of name ‘akayima’ against code
What evidence and approaches we need
Generate sufficient # of marker to overcome difficulty of dense sampling
Share samples and data in collegial manner to open taxonomic questions without unnecessary duplication
Key lessons
Editors select reviewers with appropriate taxonomic and nomenclatural expertise
Comply fully with taxonomic code
Ensure data justify conclusions
Politics and nomenclature, ‘akayima’ uses indigenous languages
Use of linnaean system
Discussion: What is a Name?
2 key species separated 10 mil years ago, Eunecteds akayima sp nov and Eunectes murinus
Derives akayima name in effort to honor indigenous nations, derived from carib language
Contributes to taxonomic stability of anacondas but advocates for usage of indigenous names in zoological nomenclature by adopting more flexible approach to ICZN and eliminating exclusionary practices in sciences and other disciplines
This paper is more interesting certainly
Love the graphics
Note their shortfallings
Tetrapods
tetrapoda=four legs in greek
Includes all land living vertebrates
Amphibians
Birds
Reptiles
Mammals
Evolution
Long and gradual process over millions of years beginning 400 MYA
Many adaptations not derived initially to life on land but once on land group continued to refine adaptations and radiated out to a number of newly derived niches (punctuated equilibrium)
All these adaptations came bc they were needed by littoral (shallow) water predatory fish
Specific adaptations
Gills and lungs (derived from swim bladders)
Palate and nares morphology (suggests a choana)
Elaboration of girdles/limbs
Elongation of snout
Precursor fish
Coelacanth-”lobe finned” fishes
Dipnoi-”lung” fishes
These species still around in modern versions
Tiktalik
One of earliest transition fossils associated with transition to land, discovered in canada in 2004
Not true tetrapod just well developed limbs
How do we separate tetrapods?
Synapomorphies of tetrapods
Characteristic present in ancestral species and shared exclusively (in more or less modified form) by its evolutionary descendants
4 distinct characters found in all tetrapods
Pelvis attached to vertebral column
Loss of opercular bone connection between pectoral girdle and skull
Allows for more head movement independent of body
Zygapophyses add stability during movement to axial skeleton
Guide movement of vertebral column
Orientation and size differs depending on specific section of skeleton
Developed limbs with carpals and tarsals and robust phalanges
Early tetrapodomorphs
Aquatic shallow water predators with useful adaptations to potential life on land
Shallows were easier to escape from larger fish, reduce predation of eggs, exploit other niches, better thermoregualtion
Number of potential hypothesis that explain why they left water
To enable overland movement to escape drying enviros
New habitats with fewer competition
Dispersal of juveniles
Search for safer location to lay eggs
Basking in sun to increase thermoregulation
Earliest known “finned stem tetrapod” Tungsenia paradoxa from lower devonian (409 mya) of China
Acanthostega Ichthyostega, Tulerpeton
Acanthostega had limbs like a fish (similar to Eusthenopteron) except it had digits rather than fin rays at end, did have stapes (tetrapod synapomorphy)
Ichthyostaega also had limbs like tetrapod and probably walked like salamander, bend in limb (elbow or knee) and digits helped limb to make better contact with substrate and pull body up off the substrate
Tulerpeton- most terrestrial with robust shoulder joint and slender digits
Adaptations for terrestrial life
Pre adaptations (exaptions)
Lungs and bucco pharangeal action
Flexible digits
Strengthened
elongate/choana
Adaptations post arrival on land (derivations)
Elaboration of lungs
Enclosed ribs and abdominal pump
Buccal force pumping
Keratinized skin
Evolution of ne sensory systems
Romers gap
Gap between early tetrapods and modern, about 30 million years
Early tetrapods had 8 digits but all modern only had 5
Pederpes helps fill this gap
Major groupings of tetrapods
Temnospondyls
Would become modern amphibians
Dominant group early on, change in topography and position on earth affected ability to do well
Huge
Synapomorphies
2 occipital condyles
Skin with mucus and poison glands
Papilia amphiniorum
Have green rods in eyes
Cutaneous respiration
Pedicellate teeth
Operculum muscle attaches to suprscapula
Levitar bulbi muscle
Those that survived ultimately evolved into Lissamphibia whic include all modern amphibians
Caecillians
Salamanders
Anurans
Antracosaurs
benefited from change in climate that would wiped most of temnospondyls
Main adaptation: amniotic eggs
Synapomorphies
Early lineage had
Thicker skin
Fibrous eggs
Internal fertilization, better prevention of egg desication
Exhibited rounding of skull, made skull stronger more muscle attachment
Ribs begin to appear but don’t fully enclose body cavity until amniotic egg appeears
Gaps in skull appear to make skull less heavy, determines how group is split
Synapsids become mammals
Diapsids become birds and modern reptiles
Transition to modern reptiles
Ultimately split and become what we consider today as modern reptile
Diapsids
Hemipenes define Lepidosauria (lizards and snakes)
Lost internal fertilization then regain it later
Archosaurs and testudines
Have single copulatory organ
Turtles included in archosauria or just outside
Includes turtles, crocs and birds
The Amphibians: Evolution, Physiology, and Taxonomy
Modern amphibians divided into 3 groups
Anurans-frogs
Caudatans- salamanders
Gymnophiona- Caecilians
8715 amphibian species
74 families
Order: Anura “without tail”, frogs
salientia= “jumping”
7678 species
54 families
Order: caudata “having tail”, salamanders
urodela=”tail visible”
816 species
10 families
Order: Gymnophiona “naked snake”, Caecilians
apoda=”without foot”
221 species
10 families
Lissamphibian Evolution
Frogs and salamanders split about 250 million years ago
Proto-frogs appeared in early Triassic
First true frogs and salamanders appeared in early Jurassic
Temnospondyls amphibian Doloserpeton
Lower Permian of Oklahoma (250-270 MYA)
Pedicellate teeth
Family Dissprophidae
Ancestor of Lissamphibia (mid Permian)
Gerobatrachus hottoni
Permian, characteristics of both frogs and salamanders
First salamanders
Marmorerpeton
Middle jurassic, England
Karaurus sharovi
Upper jurassic, Russia
Extant families of salamanders start to appear in late Cretaceous
First caecilian: Eocaecilia micropodia
Early jurassic (190 MYA), U.S.
Earliest Lissamphibian (frog): Triadobatrachus massinoti)
Lower triassic
Oldest family of extant frogs is Discoglossidae
Is lissamphibian monophyletic?
Con:
Fossil gap
Morphological and developmental differences
Pro:
Shared derived traits
Class amphibia
Tetrapod vertebrates that pass through larval state and undergo metamorphosis into terrestrial adults
Some have <4 limbs
Direct development- larvae develop in egg
Paedomorphosis- do not metamorphose
Characteristics of class amphibia!!! (16 synapomorphies)
Amniotic egg (no amnion, chorion, allantois)
Gelatinous capsules, embryo, yolk
Scales and claws absent , except earliest amphibians had dermal scaled, vestigial in caecilians
10 pairs of cranial nerves
2 occipital condyles articulate with 1st cervical vertebra- atlas
upward/downward but not side to side movement
1 sacral vertebra (sacrum)-enlarged transverse processes (diapophyses) articulate with pelvic girdle
Teeth
Homodont (structurally uniform)
Polyphyodont (continually replaced)
Pedicellate- divided into basal pedicel and distal crown
3 chambered heart (2 atria, 1 ventricle)
2 types of multicellular glands
Mucous
Poison (granular)
Cutaneous respiration
Gilled larval stage, metamorphosis
Reduced number of cranial bones (no tabular, temporal, supraoccipital, basoccipital, jugal, postorbital)
Amphibian papilla (papilla amphibiorum)-sensory region in inner ear for low frequency sounds
Opercular bone in inner ear, connected by muscle to pectoral girdle. Transmits low frequency vibration (<1000 HZ) from legs to amphibian papilla
Tympanum, stapes transmit high frequencies
Tympana lacking in salamanders, caecilians, and some frogs
Green rods in retina (except caecilians)
Also have red rods, single cones, double cones
Limited color vision
Levator bulbi muscle- elevates eye
Fat bodies associated anatomically, physiologically, and developmentally with gonads
Unique chromosome/DNA patterns
Reduced number of chromosomes
Increase in nuclear DNA
High interspecific variability in genome size
The Caudatans
Order: Caudata Salamanders “having tail”
Urodela=”tail visible”
816 species, 10 families
Salamander synapomorphies (13 total)
Adults possess long, well developed tail
Forelimbs always present and hind limbs typically present
Forelimbs and hindlimbs approximately same size
No tympanum or middle ear cavities
Many of skeletal elements are cartilaginous, skull, between vertebrae, pelvic and pectoral girdles
Most have opisthocoelous vertebrae
Larval gills are external and larvae possess 3 pairs of gills
Larvae possess true teeth similar but not identical to adult dentition
Primarily in northern temperate zones
Fertilization internal (derived lineages) or external (basal lineages Cryptobranchidae, Hynobiidae, Sirenidae). Internal fertilization by female picking up spermatophore-no copulatory organ
Aquatic or terrestrial (or both)
Development direct or indirect (via larval stage) only 20-25% species have biphasis CLC (most have direct development)
Paedomorphosis (interspecific)/paedogenesis (intraspecific) common- retain larval body form at sexual maturity
Family sirenidae
Genera 2, species 5+
Southeastern USA
2 legs
Permanent larvae (gills, no eyelids)
4 chamber heart
Well developed lungs
Keratinized beak (premaxillary)
Non Pedicellate teeth (splenial, palatine)
External fertilization
Able to reliably aestivate
Suborder Cryptobranchoidea
Current families
Cryptobranchidae
Hynobiidae
Fusion of parts of branchial arches and tibialis muscles
External fertilization- females lack spermathecae
Eggs in paired sacks
Family Hynobiidae