Definitions
Random Error: Unpredictable variation in data due to chance. It can be reduced by increasing sample size but never fully eliminated.
Bias: Systematic errors that consistently skew results in one direction. It can often be minimized with better study design.
Inherent Variability: Natural differences between subjects that cannot be controlled (e.g., genetic differences in a population).
Accounting for Errors in Study Design
Random Error: Minimized by increasing sample size or using repeated measurements.
Bias: Reduced by proper sampling methods, blinding, and careful data collection.
Inherent Variability: Managed by using stratification or statistical controls.
Internal vs. External Validity
Internal Validity: The extent to which the study accurately measures what it intends to do within the study population. Managed by controlling for confounders and bias.
External Validity: The generalizability of study results to other populations. Managed by ensuring diverse and representative samples.
Prevalence vs. Incidence Calculations
Prevalence = (Number of existing cases / Total population) at a specific time.
Incidence = (New cases / Population at risk) over a period of time.
Best Practices in Survey Design
Use clear, unbiased questions
Ensure random and representative sampling
Use consistent wording and response formats
Avoid leading questions or double-barreled questions
Selection Bias vs. Misclassification Bias
Selection Bias: Errors in how participants are chosen, leading to an unrepresentative sample. (Example: Only surveying hospital patients about a disease, missing undiagnosed cases.)
Misclassification Bias: Incorrect categorization of exposure or outcome. (Example: A study mislabels smokers as non-smokers due to self-reported data.)
Correlation vs. Causation
Correlation: A relationship between two variables without proving one causes the other.
Causation: A direct cause-and-effect relationship.
Example: Ice cream sales and drowning rates are correlated but not causal; both increase in the summer.
Principles of Disease Causality
1) all cases of a disease have multiple causes
2)not all causes act the same
3) many collections of exposures that, taken together can cause disease
Distinguishing Correlation from Causation
1) determine the issue with surveillance data
2) identify potential correlations in data
3) conduct a controlled study
5) Is the association real? check for bias or why it is not associated
Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s Causation Considerations (Pick at least 3)
Strength: Strong associations are more likely causal (e.g., smoking and lung cancer).
Consistency: The association is found in multiple studies and populations.
Temporality: Exposure must come before the outcome.
Biological Gradient (Dose-Response Relationship): Higher exposure leads to higher risk.
Plausibility: There must be a reasonable biological mechanism.
Coherence: Findings should align with existing knowledge.
Specificity single cause to a single effect
Analogy similar relationships observed with similar exposure diseases
Experiment Interventions modify outcomes
EPH
Definitions
Random Error: Unpredictable variation in data due to chance. It can be reduced by increasing sample size but never fully eliminated.
Bias: Systematic errors that consistently skew results in one direction. It can often be minimized with better study design.
Inherent Variability: Natural differences between subjects that cannot be controlled (e.g., genetic differences in a population).
Accounting for Errors in Study Design
Random Error: Minimized by increasing sample size or using repeated measurements.
Bias: Reduced by proper sampling methods, blinding, and careful data collection.
Inherent Variability: Managed by using stratification or statistical controls.
Internal vs. External Validity
Internal Validity: The extent to which the study accurately measures what it intends to do within the study population. Managed by controlling for confounders and bias.
External Validity: The generalizability of study results to other populations. Managed by ensuring diverse and representative samples.
Prevalence vs. Incidence Calculations
Prevalence = (Number of existing cases / Total population) at a specific time.
Incidence = (New cases / Population at risk) over a period of time.
Best Practices in Survey Design
Use clear, unbiased questions
Ensure random and representative sampling
Use consistent wording and response formats
Avoid leading questions or double-barreled questions
Selection Bias vs. Misclassification Bias
Selection Bias: Errors in how participants are chosen, leading to an unrepresentative sample. (Example: Only surveying hospital patients about a disease, missing undiagnosed cases.)
Misclassification Bias: Incorrect categorization of exposure or outcome. (Example: A study mislabels smokers as non-smokers due to self-reported data.)
Correlation vs. Causation
Correlation: A relationship between two variables without proving one causes the other.
Causation: A direct cause-and-effect relationship.
Example: Ice cream sales and drowning rates are correlated but not causal; both increase in the summer.
Principles of Disease Causality
1) all cases of a disease have multiple causes
2)not all causes act the same
3) many collections of exposures that, taken together can cause disease
Distinguishing Correlation from Causation
1) determine the issue with surveillance data
2) identify potential correlations in data
3) conduct a controlled study
5) Is the association real? check for bias or why it is not associated
Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s Causation Considerations (Pick at least 3)
Strength: Strong associations are more likely causal (e.g., smoking and lung cancer).
Consistency: The association is found in multiple studies and populations.
Temporality: Exposure must come before the outcome.
Biological Gradient (Dose-Response Relationship): Higher exposure leads to higher risk.
Plausibility: There must be a reasonable biological mechanism.
Coherence: Findings should align with existing knowledge.
Specificity single cause to a single effect
Analogy similar relationships observed with similar exposure diseases
Experiment Interventions modify outcomes