AP Gov 5.4: Interest Groups
Exploratory Campaigning
Publicity, book tours (often an autobiography), fundraising, debates
Intraparty Elections
Via either a direct primary or a caucus
Presidential Nomination
Done through a party convention
Convention of delegates who nominate president, write platform, and set rules for next presidential election
General Election and Electoral College
The race for the party nomination features decentralized races in each state
Influenced by national party incentives determining delegate counts
Selected via caucus or primary
Incumbency advantage
“Native sons” and daughters (being from the state the primary is held)
Open and closed participation
Logistics
Delegate distribution
Superdelegate vs. delegate
Calendar of elections
Support for Candidates
Decentralized party system
Endorsement from party elites and special interest groups
Private financing and volunteers
Acquisition of campaign skills, resources
Better and campaigning
Voter attitudes and name recognition towards incumbent
Prospective voting
Retrospective voting
States run elections for party nominating contests by party request
Synchronous rounds of voting performed via persuasive dialogue
Only registered members of the party can attend
Somewhat asynchronous
One-time voting via ballots
Features the Australian ballot
Paid for and distributed by state
Marked in private
Features all qualified candidates
Only registered party members participate
Lower turnout
More responsive to party desires
Voters do not necessarily have to register as a member of a party
Public declaration v. private choice
Can lead to “raiding the ticket”
Adaptations such as blanket primaries and rank-choice voting
Seek to limit partisanship
Try to keep schedule manageable
Carrot: allocate more delegates to go later
Stick: take away delegates if states jump the line
Want to go as early as possible
So that citizens can get a meaningful opportunity to influence outcome
Make money from ads and events
Can lead to frontloading, a phenomenon where states stack primaries and caucuses early
Frontloading allows for runaway candidates
Wants a quick nomination
Can seek to influence the sequence of nomination events for their benefits
Want states that are relatively small, have a homogenous population, and play to the voter coalition the candidate is courting
Difficult for candidates to get media attention, acquire funding, establish infrastructure, and visit
Winner-Take-Alll vs. Proportional allocation
Parties have different preferences
A faster path to declaring the nominee
Candidate with plurality wins all delegates for a state
Preferred by Republicans
50% of GOP delegates awarded by mid-March 2016
Extends the race and allows for more representation for coalitions
Candidates awarded delegates based on proportion of vote above 15%
Preferred by Democrats
50% of Democratic delegates awarded by mid-April 2016
Individuals in the party organization and party in the government who are granted the right to vote individual preference at the party nominating convention
Found in both parties
Democratic Party: 15% in 2016
Republican Party: 7% in 2016
Similar to pre-McGovern Fraser Commission delegates
Nominated regardless of the public’s preference for the presidential candidate
Number determined by party
Delegate seats awarded by allocation rules set by state
Vote as voters indicated preference on ballot
Allowed to vote as a superdelegate if there is a brokered election
Federal general elections required by Constitution on even numbered years
Federal law: first Tuesday after first Monday in November
How electors are chosen is left to states to determine by Constitution
Most states award electors via winner-take-all
Winner of the plurality vote state-wide
Maine and Nebraska have a modified district distribution called the Congressional District Method
Swing States/Battleground States
Distribution of electors and composition of voting means only competitive states with large populations matter
Include Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Michigan
Large, homogenous states have less significance in the race
Texas, California, New York
According to the Election Project’s analysis of the 2016 General Election:
43.1% of eligible voters did not vote
Hillary Clinton received 65,853,625 votes
48% of the voter turnout in total
232 Electoral College Votes
27% of the voting eligible population
Donald Trump received 62,985,106 votes
45.9% of the voter turnout in total
306 Electoral College votes
<27% of the voting eligible population
There is an advantage to geography over population in the distribution of electors, courtesy of the Great Compromise
Flawed Reforms:
Require Constitutional Amendment
Do not completely prevent an Electoral College loss of the popular vote winner
Inject a high degree of partisanship
Most popular reform: National Popular Vote Compact
Requires the agreement of enough states so that the total of their electors is equivalent to the majority of the Electoral College
Surrenders state vote to winner of popular vote
Incumbent Behavior
Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon
Name recognition
Franking privilege (sending mail for free)
Significant amounts of time spent fundraising
“Congressmen spend 5-7 hours on the phone per day”
State Election Impacts
Nomination Process
Caucus, primary, convention, canvass?
Open vs. closed primaries
“Getting on the ballot”
General Election
Ballot structure and election timing
Linkage Institutions
Special interest groups and parties
Give benefits to candidates
Endorsements
Mobilization
Going Public
Financing
Media coverage
Debates
Exploratory Campaigning
Publicity, book tours (often an autobiography), fundraising, debates
Intraparty Elections
Via either a direct primary or a caucus
Presidential Nomination
Done through a party convention
Convention of delegates who nominate president, write platform, and set rules for next presidential election
General Election and Electoral College
The race for the party nomination features decentralized races in each state
Influenced by national party incentives determining delegate counts
Selected via caucus or primary
Incumbency advantage
“Native sons” and daughters (being from the state the primary is held)
Open and closed participation
Logistics
Delegate distribution
Superdelegate vs. delegate
Calendar of elections
Support for Candidates
Decentralized party system
Endorsement from party elites and special interest groups
Private financing and volunteers
Acquisition of campaign skills, resources
Better and campaigning
Voter attitudes and name recognition towards incumbent
Prospective voting
Retrospective voting
States run elections for party nominating contests by party request
Synchronous rounds of voting performed via persuasive dialogue
Only registered members of the party can attend
Somewhat asynchronous
One-time voting via ballots
Features the Australian ballot
Paid for and distributed by state
Marked in private
Features all qualified candidates
Only registered party members participate
Lower turnout
More responsive to party desires
Voters do not necessarily have to register as a member of a party
Public declaration v. private choice
Can lead to “raiding the ticket”
Adaptations such as blanket primaries and rank-choice voting
Seek to limit partisanship
Try to keep schedule manageable
Carrot: allocate more delegates to go later
Stick: take away delegates if states jump the line
Want to go as early as possible
So that citizens can get a meaningful opportunity to influence outcome
Make money from ads and events
Can lead to frontloading, a phenomenon where states stack primaries and caucuses early
Frontloading allows for runaway candidates
Wants a quick nomination
Can seek to influence the sequence of nomination events for their benefits
Want states that are relatively small, have a homogenous population, and play to the voter coalition the candidate is courting
Difficult for candidates to get media attention, acquire funding, establish infrastructure, and visit
Winner-Take-Alll vs. Proportional allocation
Parties have different preferences
A faster path to declaring the nominee
Candidate with plurality wins all delegates for a state
Preferred by Republicans
50% of GOP delegates awarded by mid-March 2016
Extends the race and allows for more representation for coalitions
Candidates awarded delegates based on proportion of vote above 15%
Preferred by Democrats
50% of Democratic delegates awarded by mid-April 2016
Individuals in the party organization and party in the government who are granted the right to vote individual preference at the party nominating convention
Found in both parties
Democratic Party: 15% in 2016
Republican Party: 7% in 2016
Similar to pre-McGovern Fraser Commission delegates
Nominated regardless of the public’s preference for the presidential candidate
Number determined by party
Delegate seats awarded by allocation rules set by state
Vote as voters indicated preference on ballot
Allowed to vote as a superdelegate if there is a brokered election
Federal general elections required by Constitution on even numbered years
Federal law: first Tuesday after first Monday in November
How electors are chosen is left to states to determine by Constitution
Most states award electors via winner-take-all
Winner of the plurality vote state-wide
Maine and Nebraska have a modified district distribution called the Congressional District Method
Swing States/Battleground States
Distribution of electors and composition of voting means only competitive states with large populations matter
Include Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Michigan
Large, homogenous states have less significance in the race
Texas, California, New York
According to the Election Project’s analysis of the 2016 General Election:
43.1% of eligible voters did not vote
Hillary Clinton received 65,853,625 votes
48% of the voter turnout in total
232 Electoral College Votes
27% of the voting eligible population
Donald Trump received 62,985,106 votes
45.9% of the voter turnout in total
306 Electoral College votes
<27% of the voting eligible population
There is an advantage to geography over population in the distribution of electors, courtesy of the Great Compromise
Flawed Reforms:
Require Constitutional Amendment
Do not completely prevent an Electoral College loss of the popular vote winner
Inject a high degree of partisanship
Most popular reform: National Popular Vote Compact
Requires the agreement of enough states so that the total of their electors is equivalent to the majority of the Electoral College
Surrenders state vote to winner of popular vote
Incumbent Behavior
Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon
Name recognition
Franking privilege (sending mail for free)
Significant amounts of time spent fundraising
“Congressmen spend 5-7 hours on the phone per day”
State Election Impacts
Nomination Process
Caucus, primary, convention, canvass?
Open vs. closed primaries
“Getting on the ballot”
General Election
Ballot structure and election timing
Linkage Institutions
Special interest groups and parties
Give benefits to candidates
Endorsements
Mobilization
Going Public
Financing
Media coverage
Debates