knowt ap exam guide logo

AP Gov 5.4: Interest Groups

Presidential Elections

Stages of Election

  • Exploratory Campaigning

    • Publicity, book tours (often an autobiography), fundraising, debates

  • Intraparty Elections

    • Via either a direct primary or a caucus

  • Presidential Nomination

    • Done through a party convention

    • Convention of delegates who nominate president, write platform, and set rules for next presidential election

  • General Election and Electoral College

Selection of Candidates

  • The race for the party nomination features decentralized races in each state

  • Influenced by national party incentives determining delegate counts

  • Selected via caucus or primary

  • Incumbency advantage

    • “Native sons” and daughters (being from the state the primary is held)

    • Open and closed participation

  • Logistics

    • Delegate distribution

    • Superdelegate vs. delegate

    • Calendar of elections

  • Support for Candidates

    • Decentralized party system

    • Endorsement from party elites and special interest groups

    • Private financing and volunteers

Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon

  • Acquisition of campaign skills, resources

  • Better and campaigning

  • Voter attitudes and name recognition towards incumbent

    • Prospective voting

    • Retrospective voting

Caucus vs. Primary States

  • States run elections for party nominating contests by party request

Caucus

  • Synchronous rounds of voting performed via persuasive dialogue

  • Only registered members of the party can attend

Primaries

  • Somewhat asynchronous

  • One-time voting via ballots

  • Features the Australian ballot

    • Paid for and distributed by state

    • Marked in private

    • Features all qualified candidates

Closed Primaries

  • Only registered party members participate

  • Lower turnout

  • More responsive to party desires



Open Primaries

  • Voters do not  necessarily have to register as a member of a party

  • Public declaration v. private choice

  • Can lead to “raiding the ticket”

Partisanship and Primaries

  • Adaptations such as blanket primaries and rank-choice voting

  • Seek to limit partisanship

Timeline of Primaries

Parties

  • Try to keep schedule manageable

  • Carrot: allocate more delegates to go later

  • Stick: take away delegates if states jump the line

States

  • Want to go as early as possible

    • So that citizens can get a meaningful opportunity to influence outcome

    • Make money from ads and events

  • Can lead to frontloading, a phenomenon where states stack primaries and caucuses early

  • Frontloading allows for runaway candidates

Front-Runner

  • Wants a quick nomination

  • Can seek to influence the sequence of nomination events for their benefits


Candidates

  • Want states that are relatively small,  have a homogenous population, and play to the voter coalition the candidate is courting

  • Difficult for candidates to get media attention, acquire funding, establish infrastructure, and visit

Delegates

Allocation of Delegates

  • Winner-Take-Alll vs. Proportional allocation

  • Parties have different preferences

Winner-Take-All

  • A faster path to declaring the nominee

  • Candidate with plurality wins all delegates for a state

  • Preferred by Republicans

  • 50% of GOP delegates awarded by mid-March 2016

Proportional

  • Extends the race and allows for more representation for coalitions

  • Candidates awarded delegates based on proportion of vote above 15%

  • Preferred by Democrats

  • 50% of Democratic delegates awarded by mid-April 2016

Superdelegates

  • Individuals in the party organization and party in the government who are granted the right to vote individual preference at the party nominating convention

  • Found in both parties

    • Democratic Party: 15% in 2016

    • Republican Party: 7% in 2016

  • Similar to pre-McGovern Fraser Commission delegates

    • Nominated regardless of the public’s preference for the presidential candidate

Delegates

  • Number determined by party

  • Delegate seats awarded by allocation rules set by state

  • Vote as voters indicated preference on ballot

  • Allowed to vote as a superdelegate if there is a brokered election

General Elections and Electoral College

Timing of Election

  • Federal general elections required by Constitution on even numbered years

  • Federal law: first Tuesday after first Monday in November

Election selects Electors

  • How electors are chosen is left to states to determine by Constitution

  • Most states award electors via winner-take-all

    • Winner of the plurality vote state-wide

    • Maine and Nebraska have a modified district distribution called the Congressional District Method

Relative Importance of State Contests

  • Swing States/Battleground States

    • Distribution of electors and composition of voting means only competitive states with large populations matter

    • Include Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Michigan

  • Large, homogenous states have less significance in the race

    • Texas, California, New York

Significance

  • According to the Election Project’s analysis of the 2016 General Election:

  • 43.1% of eligible voters did not vote

  • Hillary Clinton received 65,853,625 votes

    • 48% of the voter turnout in total

    • 232 Electoral College Votes

    • 27% of the voting eligible population

  • Donald Trump received 62,985,106 votes

    • 45.9% of the voter turnout in total

    • 306 Electoral College votes

    • <27% of the voting eligible population

  • There is an advantage to geography over population in the distribution of electors, courtesy of the Great Compromise

Proposed Reforms

  • Flawed Reforms:

    • Require Constitutional Amendment

    • Do not completely prevent an Electoral College loss of the popular vote winner

    • Inject a high degree of partisanship

  • Most popular reform: National Popular Vote Compact

    • Requires the agreement of enough states so that the total of their electors is equivalent to the majority of the Electoral College

    • Surrenders state vote to winner of popular vote


Congressional Elections

Incumbent Behavior

  • Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon

    • Name recognition

    • Franking privilege (sending mail for free)

  • Significant amounts of time spent fundraising

  • “Congressmen spend 5-7 hours on the phone per day”

State Election Impacts

  • Nomination Process

    • Caucus, primary, convention, canvass?

    • Open vs. closed primaries

    • “Getting on the ballot”

  • General Election

    • Ballot structure and election timing

Linkage Institutions

  • Special interest groups and parties

  • Give benefits to candidates

    • Endorsements

    • Mobilization

    • Going Public

    • Financing

    • Media coverage

    • Debates

E

AP Gov 5.4: Interest Groups

Presidential Elections

Stages of Election

  • Exploratory Campaigning

    • Publicity, book tours (often an autobiography), fundraising, debates

  • Intraparty Elections

    • Via either a direct primary or a caucus

  • Presidential Nomination

    • Done through a party convention

    • Convention of delegates who nominate president, write platform, and set rules for next presidential election

  • General Election and Electoral College

Selection of Candidates

  • The race for the party nomination features decentralized races in each state

  • Influenced by national party incentives determining delegate counts

  • Selected via caucus or primary

  • Incumbency advantage

    • “Native sons” and daughters (being from the state the primary is held)

    • Open and closed participation

  • Logistics

    • Delegate distribution

    • Superdelegate vs. delegate

    • Calendar of elections

  • Support for Candidates

    • Decentralized party system

    • Endorsement from party elites and special interest groups

    • Private financing and volunteers

Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon

  • Acquisition of campaign skills, resources

  • Better and campaigning

  • Voter attitudes and name recognition towards incumbent

    • Prospective voting

    • Retrospective voting

Caucus vs. Primary States

  • States run elections for party nominating contests by party request

Caucus

  • Synchronous rounds of voting performed via persuasive dialogue

  • Only registered members of the party can attend

Primaries

  • Somewhat asynchronous

  • One-time voting via ballots

  • Features the Australian ballot

    • Paid for and distributed by state

    • Marked in private

    • Features all qualified candidates

Closed Primaries

  • Only registered party members participate

  • Lower turnout

  • More responsive to party desires



Open Primaries

  • Voters do not  necessarily have to register as a member of a party

  • Public declaration v. private choice

  • Can lead to “raiding the ticket”

Partisanship and Primaries

  • Adaptations such as blanket primaries and rank-choice voting

  • Seek to limit partisanship

Timeline of Primaries

Parties

  • Try to keep schedule manageable

  • Carrot: allocate more delegates to go later

  • Stick: take away delegates if states jump the line

States

  • Want to go as early as possible

    • So that citizens can get a meaningful opportunity to influence outcome

    • Make money from ads and events

  • Can lead to frontloading, a phenomenon where states stack primaries and caucuses early

  • Frontloading allows for runaway candidates

Front-Runner

  • Wants a quick nomination

  • Can seek to influence the sequence of nomination events for their benefits


Candidates

  • Want states that are relatively small,  have a homogenous population, and play to the voter coalition the candidate is courting

  • Difficult for candidates to get media attention, acquire funding, establish infrastructure, and visit

Delegates

Allocation of Delegates

  • Winner-Take-Alll vs. Proportional allocation

  • Parties have different preferences

Winner-Take-All

  • A faster path to declaring the nominee

  • Candidate with plurality wins all delegates for a state

  • Preferred by Republicans

  • 50% of GOP delegates awarded by mid-March 2016

Proportional

  • Extends the race and allows for more representation for coalitions

  • Candidates awarded delegates based on proportion of vote above 15%

  • Preferred by Democrats

  • 50% of Democratic delegates awarded by mid-April 2016

Superdelegates

  • Individuals in the party organization and party in the government who are granted the right to vote individual preference at the party nominating convention

  • Found in both parties

    • Democratic Party: 15% in 2016

    • Republican Party: 7% in 2016

  • Similar to pre-McGovern Fraser Commission delegates

    • Nominated regardless of the public’s preference for the presidential candidate

Delegates

  • Number determined by party

  • Delegate seats awarded by allocation rules set by state

  • Vote as voters indicated preference on ballot

  • Allowed to vote as a superdelegate if there is a brokered election

General Elections and Electoral College

Timing of Election

  • Federal general elections required by Constitution on even numbered years

  • Federal law: first Tuesday after first Monday in November

Election selects Electors

  • How electors are chosen is left to states to determine by Constitution

  • Most states award electors via winner-take-all

    • Winner of the plurality vote state-wide

    • Maine and Nebraska have a modified district distribution called the Congressional District Method

Relative Importance of State Contests

  • Swing States/Battleground States

    • Distribution of electors and composition of voting means only competitive states with large populations matter

    • Include Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Michigan

  • Large, homogenous states have less significance in the race

    • Texas, California, New York

Significance

  • According to the Election Project’s analysis of the 2016 General Election:

  • 43.1% of eligible voters did not vote

  • Hillary Clinton received 65,853,625 votes

    • 48% of the voter turnout in total

    • 232 Electoral College Votes

    • 27% of the voting eligible population

  • Donald Trump received 62,985,106 votes

    • 45.9% of the voter turnout in total

    • 306 Electoral College votes

    • <27% of the voting eligible population

  • There is an advantage to geography over population in the distribution of electors, courtesy of the Great Compromise

Proposed Reforms

  • Flawed Reforms:

    • Require Constitutional Amendment

    • Do not completely prevent an Electoral College loss of the popular vote winner

    • Inject a high degree of partisanship

  • Most popular reform: National Popular Vote Compact

    • Requires the agreement of enough states so that the total of their electors is equivalent to the majority of the Electoral College

    • Surrenders state vote to winner of popular vote


Congressional Elections

Incumbent Behavior

  • Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon

    • Name recognition

    • Franking privilege (sending mail for free)

  • Significant amounts of time spent fundraising

  • “Congressmen spend 5-7 hours on the phone per day”

State Election Impacts

  • Nomination Process

    • Caucus, primary, convention, canvass?

    • Open vs. closed primaries

    • “Getting on the ballot”

  • General Election

    • Ballot structure and election timing

Linkage Institutions

  • Special interest groups and parties

  • Give benefits to candidates

    • Endorsements

    • Mobilization

    • Going Public

    • Financing

    • Media coverage

    • Debates

robot