AP Gov 5.4: Interest Groups

Presidential Elections

Stages of Election
  • Exploratory Campaigning
      * Publicity, book tours (often an autobiography), fundraising, debates
  • Intraparty Elections
      * Via either a direct primary or a caucus
  • Presidential Nomination
      * Done through a party convention
      * Convention of delegates who nominate president, write platform, and set rules for next presidential election
  • General Election and Electoral College
Selection of Candidates
  • The race for the party nomination features decentralized races in each state
  • Influenced by national party incentives determining delegate counts
  • Selected via caucus or primary
  • Incumbency advantage
      * “Native sons” and daughters (being from the state the primary is held)
      * Open and closed participation
  • Logistics
      * Delegate distribution
      * Superdelegate vs. delegate
      * Calendar of elections
  • Support for Candidates
      * Decentralized party system
      * Endorsement from party elites and special interest groups
      * Private financing and volunteers \n \n
Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon
  • Acquisition of campaign skills, resources
  • Better and campaigning
  • Voter attitudes and name recognition towards incumbent
      * Prospective voting
      * Retrospective voting
Caucus vs. Primary States
  • States run elections for party nominating contests by party request
Caucus
  • Synchronous rounds of voting performed via persuasive dialogue
  • Only registered members of the party can attend
Primaries
  • Somewhat asynchronous
  • One-time voting via ballots
  • Features the Australian ballot
      * Paid for and distributed by state
      * Marked in private
      * Features all qualified candidates
Closed Primaries
  • Only registered party members participate
  • Lower turnout
  • More responsive to party desires \n \n \n \n
Open Primaries
  • Voters do not  necessarily have to register as a member of a party
  • Public declaration v. private choice
  • Can lead to “raiding the ticket”
Partisanship and Primaries
  • Adaptations such as blanket primaries and rank-choice voting 
  • Seek to limit partisanship

Timeline of Primaries

Parties
  • Try to keep schedule manageable
  • Carrot: allocate more delegates to go later
  • Stick: take away delegates if states jump the line
States
  • Want to go as early as possible
      * So that citizens can get a meaningful opportunity to influence outcome
      * Make money from ads and events
  • Can lead to frontloading, a phenomenon where states stack primaries and caucuses early
  • Frontloading allows for runaway candidates
Front-Runner
  • Wants a quick nomination
  • Can seek to influence the sequence of nomination events for their benefits

 \n

Candidates
  • Want states that are relatively small,  have a homogenous population, and play to the voter coalition the candidate is courting
  • Difficult for candidates to get media attention, acquire funding, establish infrastructure, and visit

Delegates

Allocation of Delegates
  • Winner-Take-Alll vs. Proportional allocation
  • Parties have different preferences
Winner-Take-All
  • A faster path to declaring the nominee
  • Candidate with plurality wins all delegates for a state
  • Preferred by Republicans
  • 50% of GOP delegates awarded by mid-March 2016
Proportional
  • Extends the race and allows for more representation for coalitions
  • Candidates awarded delegates based on proportion of vote above 15%
  • Preferred by Democrats
  • 50% of Democratic delegates awarded by mid-April 2016
Superdelegates
  • Individuals in the party organization and party in the government who are granted the right to vote individual preference at the party nominating convention
  • Found in both parties
      * Democratic Party: 15% in 2016
      * Republican Party: 7% in 2016
  • Similar to pre-McGovern Fraser Commission delegates
      * Nominated regardless of the public’s preference for the presidential candidate
Delegates
  • Number determined by party
  • Delegate seats awarded by allocation rules set by state
  • Vote as voters indicated preference on ballot
  • Allowed to vote as a superdelegate if there is a brokered election

General Elections and Electoral College

Timing of Election
  • Federal general elections required by Constitution on even numbered years
  • Federal law: first Tuesday after first Monday in November
Election selects Electors
  • How electors are chosen is left to states to determine by Constitution
  • Most states award electors via winner-take-all
      * Winner of the plurality vote state-wide
      * Maine and Nebraska have a modified district distribution called the Congressional District Method
Relative Importance of State Contests
  • Swing States/Battleground States
      * Distribution of electors and composition of voting means only competitive states with large populations matter
      * Include Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Michigan
  • Large, homogenous states have less significance in the race 
      * Texas, California, New York
Significance
  • According to the Election Project’s analysis of the 2016 General Election:
  • 43.1% of eligible voters did not vote
  • Hillary Clinton received 65,853,625 votes
      * 48% of the voter turnout in total
      * 232 Electoral College Votes
      * >27% of the voting eligible population
  • Donald Trump received 62,985,106 votes
      * 45.9% of the voter turnout in total
      * 306 Electoral College votes
      * <27% of the voting eligible population
  • There is an advantage to geography over population in the distribution of electors, courtesy of the Great Compromise
Proposed Reforms
  • Flawed Reforms:
      * Require Constitutional Amendment
      * Do not completely prevent an Electoral College loss of the popular vote winner
      * Inject a high degree of partisanship
  • Most popular reform: National Popular Vote Compact
      * Requires the agreement of enough states so that the total of their electors is equivalent to the majority of the Electoral College
      * Surrenders state vote to winner of popular vote

 \n

Congressional Elections

Incumbent Behavior

  • Incumbency Advantage Phenomenon
      * Name recognition 
      * Franking privilege (sending mail for free)
  • Significant amounts of time spent fundraising
  • “Congressmen spend 5-7 hours on the phone per day”

State Election Impacts

  • Nomination Process   
      * Caucus, primary, convention, canvass?
      * Open vs. closed primaries
      * “Getting on the ballot”
  • General Election
      * Ballot structure and election timing

Linkage Institutions

  • Special interest groups and parties
  • Give benefits to candidates
      * Endorsements
      * Mobilization
      * Going Public
      * Financing
      * Media coverage
      * Debates