Organizational Development (OD) refers to planned efforts aimed at improving an organization’s effectiveness and well-being. These efforts are broad and involve changing how people work, communicate, and collaborate—not just reorganization.
Change Agent: A person who facilitates change; often acts as a guide or expert.
Why OD is hard: Resistance, stress, and fear of uncertainty.
Success Process (Armenakis & Bedeian, 1999):
Employees realize change is needed → may feel anxious or doubtful.
A plan is created and implemented.
Resistance occurs.
New practices must be reinforced and become the norm.
A goal-setting method where each employee's goals align with higher-level objectives.
Goals must be specific, measurable, and linked to performance.
✅ Good for: Increasing alignment and productivity.
❌ Weakness: Can become rigid or overly bureaucratic.
Example:
CEO sets goal to “increase revenue by 20%.”
Sales team gets target: “Close 10 new clients per month.”
Employees fill out surveys anonymously (job satisfaction, communication, etc.)
A report is compiled and shared across the organization for reflection and improvement.
✅ Good for: Giving employees a voice, data-driven decisions.
❌ Weakness: Requires leadership openness.
Example:
Survey shows many feel undervalued → Company introduces recognition programs.
Helps improve performance and communication within teams.
Types:
Task-focused: Focused on performance.
Interpersonal-focused: Focused on relationship and trust.
✅ Good for: Fixing team dysfunctions.
❌ Weakness: Can feel forced or superficial.
Example:
A marketing team learns to clarify roles through a weekend retreat.
Groups of strangers undergo interpersonal exercises to increase self-awareness and feedback skills.
Feels a bit like group therapy.
✅ Good for: Deep self-awareness.
❌ Weakness: Emotionally intense; no guaranteed workplace impact.
Example:
A participant learns they come across as dismissive, which changes their communication style back at work.
Focus: Clear hierarchy, rules, and role specialization.
Main Features:
Division of Labor – Each role has a specific task.
Delegation of Authority – Work flows downward.
Chain of Command – Clear lines of responsibility.
Span of Control – # of subordinates per supervisor.
Line vs Staff Roles – Line = core function; Staff = support.
✅ Great for: Stability, predictability (e.g., government, banks).
❌ Weak for: Creativity, adaptability.
Example Scenario:
A government agency where paperwork must pass through five approvals before action is taken.
Focus: How a manager’s beliefs shape how they lead and how employees behave.
Theory X: Assumes workers dislike work, avoid responsibility, and need close supervision.
Theory Y: Assumes workers are motivated, enjoy responsibility, and thrive with autonomy.
✅ Theory Y encourages: Empowerment, creativity, and trust.
❌ Theory X encourages: Control, micromanagement.
Example Scenario:
X: A manager closely monitors all remote workers and doesn’t trust self-management.
Y: A manager gives employees freedom to design their own schedules and rewards creativity.
Also:
Theory Z (Ouchi): Commitment grows when people expect to spend their whole careers in one organization.
Focus: Organizations are like living organisms that must adapt to their environments.
How it works:
Takes inputs (resources),
Processes them (production, systems),
Produces outputs (goods/services),
Constantly receives feedback to adapt and survive.
✅ Good for: Businesses that face change and competition.
❌ Challenging: Requires continuous adjustment.
Example Scenario:
A tech company uses customer reviews and market trends to pivot its strategy every quarter.
Focus: The fit between people (social systems) and tools/machines (technical systems).
Core Ideas:
Joint Optimization: Design tech and social systems together.
Unit Control of Variance: The person encountering the issue should fix it.
Self-regulation: Teams organize themselves rather than rely on rigid hierarchies.
✅ Good for: Agile teams, manufacturing, tech startups.
❌ Risky for: Rigid or highly controlled environments.
Example Scenario:
A software team has autonomy to solve bugs, deploy updates, and coordinate daily without asking for managerial permission.
Theory | Focus | Human Role | Structure & Control | Adaptability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bureaucracy | Structure, efficiency | Task-specialists | Hierarchical, rule-based | Low |
Theory X/Y | Motivation, leadership beliefs | Passive or active agents | Depends on assumptions | Medium |
Open Systems | Environment & adaptation | Interdependent units | Dynamic feedback loops | High |
Sociotechnical Systems | Tech + human system balance | Empowered participants | Team-based, autonomous | Very High |
Concept | Culture | Climate |
---|---|---|
Definition | Deep-rooted values, "how things are done" | Psychological atmosphere, perceptions |
Focus | History, traditions | Current experiences |
Changeable? | Hard to change | Easier to shift |
Origin | Sociology, anthropology | Psychology |
Culture = The DNA of the organization
Climate = The weather today in the workplace
Each theory and strategy brings a unique lens to understanding how organizations function and how change can be implemented. If you're a future psychologist, manager, or consultant, combining the right mindset (Theory Y), structure (sociotechnical or open systems), and strategy (MBO, team-building, etc.) can make change smoother and more successful.