Sample: A subset of individuals from a larger population used to make inferences about the whole.
Sampling Frame: A list or database from which a sample is drawn (e.g., a list of registered voters).
Element: The individual unit of analysis in a sample (e.g., a person, a household, a school).
Sampling Error: The difference between sample results and the true population values due to chance.
Sampling Unit: The entity selected at each stage of sampling (e.g., individuals, groups, organizations).
Representative Sample: A sample that accurately reflects the characteristics of the population.
Sample Generalizability: The extent to which findings from a sample apply to the larger population.
Cross-Population Generalizability (External Validity): The extent to which findings apply across different populations or settings.
Simple Random Sampling: Every element has an equal chance of being selected.
Systematic Random Sampling: Selecting every kth element from a list (e.g., every 10th person).
Stratified Random Sampling: Dividing the population into strata (e.g., age groups) and randomly sampling within each stratum.
Proportionate: Sample proportions match the population proportions.
Disproportionate: Some strata are oversampled for better representation.
Cluster Sampling: Groups (clusters) are randomly selected, then individuals within them are sampled.
Convenience Sampling: Selecting individuals based on ease of access.
Purposive (Judgmental) Sampling: Selecting individuals who fit a specific criterion.
Snowball Sampling: Participants recruit others (useful for hard-to-reach populations).
Quota Sampling: Ensuring the sample meets a predetermined demographic quota.
Empirical Association: A relationship exists between variables.
Temporal Order: The cause must precede the effect.
Non-Spuriousness: No alternative explanations (confounding variables) exist.
Example: If studying the effect of sleep on test scores:
Cause: Amount of sleep
Effect: Test performance
Independent & Dependent Variables (Cause & Effect).
Pretest & Posttest Measures (Before & After).
Random Assignment (Participants randomly assigned to groups).
Experimental & Control Groups (Treatment vs. No treatment).
Nonequivalent Control Group Design: Uses pre-existing groups instead of random assignment.
Before-and-After Design: Measures the same group before and after a treatment.
Time-Series Design: Multiple observations before and after the intervention.
Internal Validity: The degree to which a study accurately shows a causal relationship.
Threats to Internal Validity:
Selection Bias (non-random groups).
History Effects (outside events affecting results).
Maturation (natural changes over time).
Testing Effects (learning from previous tests).
Instrumentation (changes in measurement methods).
Regression to the Mean (extreme scores shifting toward average).
Trend Studies: Data collected at different times from different samples.
Panel Studies: The same individuals are followed over time.
Cohort Studies: A specific group is studied over time (e.g., people born in 2000).
Collect data efficiently from large populations.
Standardized questions ensure comparability.
Allow for statistical analysis of relationships.
Uniform Crime Report (UCR): Official police-reported crime data.
Strengths: Nationwide data, good for tracking trends.
Weaknesses: Underreporting due to unreported crimes.
National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS): Self-reported victimization survey.
Strengths: Captures unreported crimes.
Weaknesses: Memory issues, exaggeration, or misreporting.
Avoid:
Leading questions (e.g., "Don't you agree that…?")
Double-barreled questions (asking two things at once).
Ambiguous wording.
Social desirability bias (people responding in a way they think is acceptable).
Increases reliability.
Captures broader concepts.
Reduces the impact of individual question bias.
Mail Surveys:
Strengths: Cost-effective, anonymous.
Weaknesses: Low response rates.
Telephone Surveys:
Strengths: Fast, easier to clarify responses.
Weaknesses: Declining response rates, bias toward people with landlines.
Face-to-Face Interviews:
Strengths: High response rate, detailed answers.
Weaknesses: Expensive, interviewer bias.
Online Surveys:
Strengths: Quick, inexpensive.
Weaknesses: Sample bias (only internet users).
Mixed-Mode Surveys:
Strengths: Combines methods to increase responses.
Weaknesses: Can be complex and costly.