KS

Infection Science – Serological Diagnostics Vocabulary

Learning Outcomes

  • By the end of the session (plus targeted reading) you should be able to:

    • Discuss the principles behind a range of diagnostic (serological) methods.

    • Compare and contrast advantages, disadvantages, and real-world applications of each method.

    • Correctly interpret serological test data in a clinical context.

Key Definitions

  • Serology: study of serum components, primarily antibodies.

    • In vitro immune reactions exploited include precipitation, agglutination, complement fixation, etc.

  • Serological test: any diagnostic procedure based on an antigen–antibody reaction.

    • Measures serum antibody titres or detects specific antigens (e.g., \text{HLA}, HIV p24).

  • Immunoassay: laboratory method that uses an antibody (or antigen) as a reagent to detect or quantify its binding partner.

    • Unlabelled immunoassays: visibility of reaction is intrinsic (precipitate / clump).

    • Labelled immunoassays: reaction revealed by a tag (radio‐isotope, enzyme, fluorochrome, etc.).

Blood Components Overview

  • Whole blood: cellular elements (erythrocytes, leucocytes, platelets) + plasma.

  • Plasma (clear yellow fluid): water, electrolytes, glucose, proteins (coagulation factors, albumin, antibodies), etc.

  • Serum (Latin whey): plasma minus fibrinogen & other clotting factors.

    • In diagnostics, serum is preferred because clotting proteins can interfere with tests.

Serology — Principal Applications

  • Clinical diagnostics:

    • Detect antibodies generated against pathogens, allergens, tumours, self-antigens (autoimmunity), or altered gene products.

    • Detect circulating antigens (e.g., microbial, viral, HLA typing, blood-group antigens).

  • Research & biotechnology:

    • Antibody-based purification (affinity chromatography), protein quantification, vaccine development, etc.

  • Blood-grouping and transfusion compatibility.

Immunoassay Techniques — Bird’s-Eye View

  • Unlabelled (visual):

    • Precipitation reactions (e.g., radial immunodiffusion).

    • Agglutination reactions (haemagglutination, latex, bacterial slide tests).

  • Labelled (signal amplification):

    • Radioimmunoassay (RIA).

    • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) – multiple formats.

    • Western Blot.

    • Flow Cytometry.

Unlabelled Immunoassays

Precipitation Reactions

  • Occur in aqueous or semi-solid media (agar).

  • Lattice formation: bivalent antibodies + bi/poly-valent soluble antigens → visible precipitin lines.

    • Monovalent antigens do not precipitate.

  • Suitable for qualitative pattern analysis (identity, partial identity) and semi-quantification.

Radial Immunodiffusion (RID)
  • Agar contains antibody; antigen diffuses radially ➞ ring diameter \propto concentration.

  • Quantifies serum immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgA), complement proteins (C3, C4), microbial antigens.

  • Clinical uses: diagnose primary immunodeficiencies (e.g., X-linked agammaglobulinaemia), confirm reduced complement.

  • Limitations: slow (24–72 h), relatively expensive, poor sensitivity for low-abundance analytes (IgE, IgD).

Agglutination Reactions

  • Antibodies bind particulate (cellular) antigens ➞ visible clumping.

Haemagglutination (HA)
  • ABO blood typing: anti-A or anti-B sera added to erythrocytes; agglutination pattern reveals group.

  • Viral quantitation: e.g., influenza, rubella titres measured by ability to agglutinate red cells.

Bacterial Agglutination
  • Direct slide test: identify bacteria in culture by reacting with specific antisera.

  • Indirect (serum) test: patient serum + known bacterial antigen ➞ presence of antibodies indicates infection; titre reflects disease stage.

Latex Agglutination
  • Pathogen antigens coated onto latex beads; patient serum supplies antibody.

  • Rapid, point-of-care diagnosis (minutes). Examples: Group B strep, H. influenzae type b.

Labelled Immunoassays

Radioimmunoassay (RIA)

  • Invented by Yalow & Berson (1950s); Yalow received 1977 Nobel Prize.

  • Competitive binding: trace radiolabelled antigen competes with sample antigen for limited antibody sites.

  • Highly sensitive (pg/mL range); applications include hormones, drugs, vitamins, viral antigens.

  • Drawback: radioactive waste & specialised instrumentation.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

  • Concept by Engvall & Perlmann (1971); enzyme replaces radio-isotope.

  • Core steps:

    1. Coating/Capture – immobilise antigen or antibody on microplate.

    2. Blocking – saturate unbound surface with irrelevant protein (e.g., BSA) to prevent non-specific binding.

    3. Probing/Detection – add sample + enzyme-linked antibody (direct) or primary + enzyme-linked secondary (indirect).

    4. Signal – add substrate; measure colour/fluorescence \propto analyte amount.

  • Amenable to automation (96–1536-well plates); rapid and quantitative.

Direct ELISA
  • Single enzyme-conjugated antibody detects antigen.

  • Simple & quick but lower sensitivity (signal not amplified) and higher background.

Indirect ELISA
  • Primary antibody unlabelled; enzyme-linked secondary antibody binds Fc region.

  • Increased sensitivity & flexible (same secondary for many primaries) but extra incubation/wash.

Sandwich (Capture) ELISA
  • Two antibodies recognise different epitopes on same antigen ("antigen captured between 2 arms").

  • High specificity; widely used for detecting viral, bacterial, fungal antigens (e.g., HIV p24).

    • Versions: Direct (tag on capture Ab) and Indirect (tag on detection Ab).

Competitive ELISA
  • Useful when antigen has single epitope or steric hindrance.

  • Sample antigen competes with immobilised antigen for binding antibody OR vice-versa.

    • Inverse signal relationship: more antigen in sample → less antibody available to bind plate → lower optical density.

ELISA Formats Summary
  • Direct capture, direct sandwich, indirect sandwich, indirect, and competitive; choice depends on antigen size, epitope number, matrix complexity, desired sensitivity.

Western Blot

  • Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE (size) in semi-solid polyacrylamide → transferred to membrane.

  • Membrane probed with specific antibody; signal (enzyme/fluor) indicates presence & molecular weight of antigen.

  • Confirmatory test in virology (e.g., HIV), autoimmune profiling, research.

Flow Cytometry

  • Suspension of labelled cells passed single-file through laser beam; detectors measure:

    • Forward scatter (FSC) – approx. cell size.

    • Side scatter (SSC) – internal complexity/granularity.

    • Fluorescence – bound Ab-fluor conjugates reveal antigen expression (phenotyping).

  • Example immunophenotyping panel:

    • CD3-FITC (\lambda{ex}=492\,\text{nm},\;\lambda{em}=518\,\text{nm}) – pan-T cells.

    • CD4-APC (\lambda_{em}=660\,\text{nm}) – helper T cells.

    • CD8-PE (\lambda_{em}=578\,\text{nm}) – cytotoxic T cells.

  • Generates multiparametric data per cell (10⁴–10⁵ cells/s).

Interpretation & Clinical Use of Serology

  1. Acute infection diagnosis – measure IgM vs IgG by ELISA:

    • (+) IgM, (–) IgG → recent infection.

    • (–) IgM, (+) IgG → past infection (> 6 months).

  2. Immunological memory – verify protective antibodies after infection or vaccination (e.g., MMR).

  3. Screening of blood/organs – mandatory tests for HIV, HBV, HCV, syphilis.

  4. Congenital infection – IgM in neonate or persisting IgG > 6 months indicates maternal–foetal transmission.

  5. Primary immunodeficiency – abnormal immunoglobulin pattern (quantified by RID or nephelometry).

  • Rationale for serology over culture:

    • Antigens/antibodies abundant and stable in fluids.

    • Pathogen culture may be slow, insensitive, or impossible (anaerobes, intracellular microbes).

Automation of Serological Tests

  • Emerged with enzyme immunoassay technology (1970s).

  • Advantages:

    • High throughput (96/384/1536 wells).

    • Reduced human error; consistent incubation & wash cycles.

    • Cost-effective on volume; integration with LIMS.

  • Robotic ELISA workstations illustrate modern laboratory workflows.

Exam Revision — Guidance

  • Be able to define serology and justify its use in infectious-disease diagnostics.

  • Provide at least two unlabelled immunoassay examples (RID, HA, latex) and outline principles.

  • Provide at least two labelled immunoassay examples (RIA, ELISA, Western, Flow Cytometry) and outline principles.

  • Discuss advantages/limitations (sensitivity, speed, cost, hazards).

Recommended Reading

  • Rittenhouse-Olson K., De Nardin E. (2013) Contemporary Clinical Immunology & Serology – Chapters 6 & 7.

  • Crocker J. & Burnett D. (2005) The Science of Laboratory Diagnosis – Chapters 20 & 21.

  • Kuby Immunology 7ᵗʰ Ed – Chapter 20.

  • Murphy K. Janeway’s Immunobiology – Appendix I.

Extra Notes & Anecdotes

  • Humorous intro slide: “SIPILESS: A simple stress test – I do your blood work, send it to the lab, and never get back to you with the results.”

    • Highlights the critical need for proper result communication.

  • Ethical considerations:

    • Handling of patient samples & data confidentiality.

    • Radiation safety for RIA.

    • Proper disposal of biohazardous & chemical waste.

  • Practical caveats:

    • Cross-reactivity can cause false positives (e.g., rheumatoid factor → false IgM detection).

    • Window periods (time between infection & detectable antibodies) require antigen tests or nucleic acid assays.