AMT-1105-PRELIM-MODULE-1-1
PRELIM MODULE 1
AMT 1105 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
AND LANDING GEARS
Mr. Harold Naguit Tiglao
AMT Instructor
TABLE OF CONTENT | Ref.no | PAGE NO. |
TABLE OF REFERENCES | 1 ,2 and 3 | 2 |
HISTORY OF AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES | 4 | |
REVIEW TOPICS | 9 | |
ENRICHMENT ACTIVTY | 10 |
TABLE OF REFERENCES |
1. Jepessen A&P Technician Textbook, Airframe Handbook Jepessen Sanderson Incorporated |
2. Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook-Airframe (2012) US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration |
3. Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook – General (2018) US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration |
You should be able to complete this module including all the self-assessment, research works, assignments and other performance tasks within 1.31 hours
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME
MODULE LEARNING OUTCOME
CLO 1. Discuss the value and development of aircraft structures.
MLO 1. Recognize and recall the important events and development of aircraft structures.
MLO 2. Identify the different early concept on the construction and design of aircraft.
TOPIC LEARNING OUTCOME
TLO1. Recognize and recall the important events in history of aviation aircraft structures
The history of aircraft structures underlies the history of aviation in general. Advances in materials and processes used to construct aircraft have led to their evolution from simple wood truss structures to the sleek aerodynamic flying machines of today. Combined with continuous powerplant development, the structures of “flying machines” have changed significantly.
The key discovery that “lift” could be created by passing air over the top of a curved surface set the development of fixed and rotary-wing aircraft in motion. George Cayley developed an efficient cambered airfoil in the early 1800s, as well as successful manned gliders later in that century. He established the principles of flight, including the existence of lift, weight, thrust, and drag. It was Cayley who first stacked wings and created a tri- wing glider that flew a man in 1853.
Earlier, Cayley studied the center of gravity of flying machines, as well as the effects of wing dihedral. Furthermore, he pioneered directional control of aircraft by including the earliest form of a rudder on his gliders. [Figure 1-1]
In the late 1800s, Otto Lilienthal built upon Cayley’s discoveries. He manufactured and flew his own gliders on over 2,000 flights. His willow and cloth aircraft had wings designed from extensive study of the wings of birds. Lilienthal also made standard use of vertical and horizontal fins behind the wings and pilot station. Above all, Lilienthal proved that man could fly. [Figure 1-2]
Octave Chanute, a retired railroad and bridge engineer, was active in aviation during the 1890s. [Figure 1-3] His interest was so great that, among other things, he published a definitive work called “Progress in Flying Machines.” This was the culmination of his effort to gather and study all the information available on aviation. With the assistance of others, he built gliders similar to Lilienthal’s and then his own. In addition to his publication, Chanute advanced aircraft structure development by building a glider with stacked wings incorporating the use of wires as wing supports.
The work of all of these men was known to the Wright Brothers when they built their successful, powered airplane in 1903. The first of its kind to carry a man aloft, the Wright Flyer had thin, cloth-covered wings attached to what was primarily truss structures made of wood. The wings contained forward and rear spars and were supported with both struts and wires. Stacked wings (two sets) were also part of the Wright Flyer. [Figure 1- 4]
Powered heavier-than-air aviation grew from the Wright design. Inventors and fledgling aviators began building their own aircraft. Early on, many were similar to that constructed by the Wrights using wood and fabric with wires and struts to support the wing structure.
In 1909, Frenchman Louis Bleriot produced an aircraft with notable design differences. He built a successful mono-wing aircraft. The wings were still supported by wires, but a mast extending above the fuselage enabled the wings to be supported from above, as well as underneath. This made possible the extended wing length needed to lift an aircraft with a single set of wings. Bleriot used a Pratt truss- type fuselage frame. [Figure 1-5]
More powerful engines were developed and airframe structures changed to take advantage of the benefits. As early as 1910, German Hugo Junkers was able to build an aircraft with metal truss construction and metal skin due to the availability of stronger powerplants to thrust the plane forward and into the sky. The use of metal instead of wood for the primary structure eliminated the need for external wing braces and wires. His J-1 also had a single set of wings (a monoplane) instead of a stacked set. [Figure 1-6]
Leading up to World War I (WWI), stronger engines also allowed designers to develop thicker wings with stronger spars. Wire wing bracing was no longer needed. Flatter, lower wing surfaces on high-camber wings created more lift. WWI expanded the need for large quantities of reliable aircraft. Used mostly for reconnaissance, stacked- wing tail draggers with wood and metal truss frames with mostly fabric skin dominated the wartime sky.
[Figure 1-7] The Red Baron’s Fokker DR-1 was typical.
In the 1920s, the use of metal in aircraft construction increased. Fuselages able to carry cargo and passengers were developed. The early flying boats with their hull-type construction from the shipbuilding industry provided the blueprints for semimonocoque construction of fuselages. [Figure 1-8] Truss-type designs faded. A tendency toward cleaner monowing designs prevailed.
Into the 1930s, all-metal aircraft accompanied new lighter and more powerful engines. Larger semimonocoque fuselages were complimented with stress-skin wing designs. Fewer truss and fabric aircraft were built. World War II (WWII) brought about a myriad of aircraft designs using all metal technology. Deep fuel-carrying wings were the norm, but the desire for higher flight speeds prompted the development of thin-winged aircraft in which fuel was carried in the fuselage. The first composite structure aircraft, the De
Havilland Mosquito, used a balsa wood sandwich material in the construction of the fuselage. [Figure 1-9] The fiberglass radome was also developed during this period.
After WWII, the development of turbine engines led to higher altitude flight. The need for pressurized aircraft pervaded aviation. Semimonocoque construction needed to be made even stronger as a result.
Refinements to the all-metal semimonocoque fuselage structure were made to increase strength and combat metal fatigue caused by the pressurization- depressurization cycle. Rounded windows and door openings were developed to avoid weak areas where cracks could form. Integrally machined copper alloy aluminum skin resisted cracking and allowed thicker skin and controlled tapering.
Chemical milling of wing skin structures provided great strength and smooth high- performance surfaces. Variable contour wings became easier to construct. Increases in flight speed accompanying jet travel brought about the need for thinner wings. Wing loading also increased greatly. Multispar and box beam wing designs were developed in response.
In the 1960s, ever larger aircraft were developed to carry passengers. As engine technology improved, the jumbo jet was engineered and built. Still primarily aluminum with a semimonocoque fuselage, the sheer size of the airliners of the day initiated a search for lighter and stronger materials from which to build them. The use of honeycomb constructed panels in Boeing’s airline series saved weight while not compromising strength. Initially, aluminum core with aluminum or fiberglass skin sandwich panels were used on wing panels, flight control surfaces, cabin floor boards, and other applications.
A steady increase in the use of honeycomb and foam core sandwich components and a wide variety of composite materials characterizes the state of aviation structures from the 1970s to the present. Advanced techniques and material combinations have resulted in a gradual shift from aluminum to carbon fiber and other strong, lightweight materials. These new materials are engineered to meet specific performance requirements for various components on the aircraft. Many airframe structures are made of more than 50 percent advanced composites,
with some airframes approaching 100 percent. The term “very light jet” (VLJ) has come to describe a new generation of jet aircraft made almost entirely of advanced composite materials. [Figure 1-10] It is possible that noncomposite aluminum aircraft structures will become obsolete as did the methods and materials of construction used by Cayley, Lilienthal, and the Wright Brothers.
REVIEW:
materials were thus invented. philosophy of searching for a lighter or more robust structure. try to improve strength, reduce density or both.
You should be able to complete the activity within 30 minutes.
Academic Honesty Clause
Plagiarism is the use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one’s original work. (1995 Random House Compact Unabridged Dictionary)
In the academe, it is an adaption or reproduction of an original intellectual creation, be it concepts, ideas, methods, pieces of information or expressions of another author, whether individual, group, or organization without proper acknowledgment. Moreover, plagiarism can range from borrowing a particular phrase or sentence to paraphrasing someone else’s original idea without citing it. The most common form of plagiarism, especially nowadays, is copying and pasting online material without crediting the source.
Every student must practice Academic Honesty. Academic misconduct is subject to an academic penalty by the instructor and/or disciplinary sanction by the College.
I _____________________________ fully understood the definition and description of plagiarism stated above and I am familiar with the Student Conduct Code. I am aware that I shall be penalized if plagiarism is found evident on my output which includes, gaining a failing grade.
As a college student and a member of scholarly community, I shall value other people’s ideas. Thus, I pledged to commit to the following truthful statements:
_______________________
(Signature over Printed Name)
REFERENCES:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-collegesuccess-lumen1/chapter/academic-honesty/
https://www.business.umt.edu/ethics/academic-honesty.php
ESSAY RUBRIC
CRITERIA | INADEQUATE (Below Standard) 65%-74% | ADEQUATE (Meets Standard) 75%-84% | ABOVE AVERAGE (Exceeds Standard) 85%-92% | EXEMPLARY (Far Exceeds Standard) 93%-100% | SCORE |
Organization | Writing lacks logical organization. It | Writing is coherent and logically organized. | Writing is coherent and logically | Writing shows high degree of attention to | |
shows some | Some points remain | organized with | logic and reasoning | ||
coherence but ideas | misplaced and stray | transitions used | of points. Unity | ||
lack unity. Serious | from the topic. | between ideas and | clearly leads the | ||
errors. | Transitions evident but | paragraphs to create | reader to the | ||
not used throughout | coherence. Overall | conclusion and stirs | |||
essay. | unity of ideas is | thought regarding the | |||
present. | topic. | ||||
Level of Content | Shows some thinking and reasoning but | Content indicates thinking and reasoning | Content indicates original thinking and | Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in- | |
most ideas are | applied with original | develops ideas with | depth analysis and | ||
underdeveloped and | thought on a few ideas. | sufficient and firm | evidences original | ||
unoriginal. | evidence. | thought and support | |||
for the topic. | |||||
Development | Main points lack detailed development. | Main points are present with limited detail and | Main points well developed with | Main points well developed with high | |
Ideas are vague with | development. Some | quality supporting | quality and quantity | ||
little evidence of | critical thinking is | details and quantity. | support. Reveals high | ||
critical thinking. | present. | Critical thinking is | degree of critical | ||
weaved into points. | thinking. | ||||
Grammar & Mechanics | Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create | Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct | Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical | Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and | |
distraction, making | allowing reader to | errors allowing reader | grammatical errors; | ||
reading difficult; | progress the essay. | to follow ideas | absent of fragments, | ||
fragments, comma | Some errors remain. | clearly. Very few | comma splices, and | ||
splices, run-ons | fragments or run-ons. | run-ons. | |||
evident. Errors are | |||||
frequent. | |||||
GRADE (score/4) |
PRELIM MODULE 1
AMT 1105 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
AND LANDING GEARS
Mr. Harold Naguit Tiglao
AMT Instructor
TABLE OF CONTENT | Ref.no | PAGE NO. |
TABLE OF REFERENCES | 1 ,2 and 3 | 2 |
HISTORY OF AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES | 4 | |
REVIEW TOPICS | 9 | |
ENRICHMENT ACTIVTY | 10 |
TABLE OF REFERENCES |
1. Jepessen A&P Technician Textbook, Airframe Handbook Jepessen Sanderson Incorporated |
2. Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook-Airframe (2012) US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration |
3. Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook – General (2018) US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration |
You should be able to complete this module including all the self-assessment, research works, assignments and other performance tasks within 1.31 hours
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME
MODULE LEARNING OUTCOME
CLO 1. Discuss the value and development of aircraft structures.
MLO 1. Recognize and recall the important events and development of aircraft structures.
MLO 2. Identify the different early concept on the construction and design of aircraft.
TOPIC LEARNING OUTCOME
TLO1. Recognize and recall the important events in history of aviation aircraft structures
The history of aircraft structures underlies the history of aviation in general. Advances in materials and processes used to construct aircraft have led to their evolution from simple wood truss structures to the sleek aerodynamic flying machines of today. Combined with continuous powerplant development, the structures of “flying machines” have changed significantly.
The key discovery that “lift” could be created by passing air over the top of a curved surface set the development of fixed and rotary-wing aircraft in motion. George Cayley developed an efficient cambered airfoil in the early 1800s, as well as successful manned gliders later in that century. He established the principles of flight, including the existence of lift, weight, thrust, and drag. It was Cayley who first stacked wings and created a tri- wing glider that flew a man in 1853.
Earlier, Cayley studied the center of gravity of flying machines, as well as the effects of wing dihedral. Furthermore, he pioneered directional control of aircraft by including the earliest form of a rudder on his gliders. [Figure 1-1]
In the late 1800s, Otto Lilienthal built upon Cayley’s discoveries. He manufactured and flew his own gliders on over 2,000 flights. His willow and cloth aircraft had wings designed from extensive study of the wings of birds. Lilienthal also made standard use of vertical and horizontal fins behind the wings and pilot station. Above all, Lilienthal proved that man could fly. [Figure 1-2]
Octave Chanute, a retired railroad and bridge engineer, was active in aviation during the 1890s. [Figure 1-3] His interest was so great that, among other things, he published a definitive work called “Progress in Flying Machines.” This was the culmination of his effort to gather and study all the information available on aviation. With the assistance of others, he built gliders similar to Lilienthal’s and then his own. In addition to his publication, Chanute advanced aircraft structure development by building a glider with stacked wings incorporating the use of wires as wing supports.
The work of all of these men was known to the Wright Brothers when they built their successful, powered airplane in 1903. The first of its kind to carry a man aloft, the Wright Flyer had thin, cloth-covered wings attached to what was primarily truss structures made of wood. The wings contained forward and rear spars and were supported with both struts and wires. Stacked wings (two sets) were also part of the Wright Flyer. [Figure 1- 4]
Powered heavier-than-air aviation grew from the Wright design. Inventors and fledgling aviators began building their own aircraft. Early on, many were similar to that constructed by the Wrights using wood and fabric with wires and struts to support the wing structure.
In 1909, Frenchman Louis Bleriot produced an aircraft with notable design differences. He built a successful mono-wing aircraft. The wings were still supported by wires, but a mast extending above the fuselage enabled the wings to be supported from above, as well as underneath. This made possible the extended wing length needed to lift an aircraft with a single set of wings. Bleriot used a Pratt truss- type fuselage frame. [Figure 1-5]
More powerful engines were developed and airframe structures changed to take advantage of the benefits. As early as 1910, German Hugo Junkers was able to build an aircraft with metal truss construction and metal skin due to the availability of stronger powerplants to thrust the plane forward and into the sky. The use of metal instead of wood for the primary structure eliminated the need for external wing braces and wires. His J-1 also had a single set of wings (a monoplane) instead of a stacked set. [Figure 1-6]
Leading up to World War I (WWI), stronger engines also allowed designers to develop thicker wings with stronger spars. Wire wing bracing was no longer needed. Flatter, lower wing surfaces on high-camber wings created more lift. WWI expanded the need for large quantities of reliable aircraft. Used mostly for reconnaissance, stacked- wing tail draggers with wood and metal truss frames with mostly fabric skin dominated the wartime sky.
[Figure 1-7] The Red Baron’s Fokker DR-1 was typical.
In the 1920s, the use of metal in aircraft construction increased. Fuselages able to carry cargo and passengers were developed. The early flying boats with their hull-type construction from the shipbuilding industry provided the blueprints for semimonocoque construction of fuselages. [Figure 1-8] Truss-type designs faded. A tendency toward cleaner monowing designs prevailed.
Into the 1930s, all-metal aircraft accompanied new lighter and more powerful engines. Larger semimonocoque fuselages were complimented with stress-skin wing designs. Fewer truss and fabric aircraft were built. World War II (WWII) brought about a myriad of aircraft designs using all metal technology. Deep fuel-carrying wings were the norm, but the desire for higher flight speeds prompted the development of thin-winged aircraft in which fuel was carried in the fuselage. The first composite structure aircraft, the De
Havilland Mosquito, used a balsa wood sandwich material in the construction of the fuselage. [Figure 1-9] The fiberglass radome was also developed during this period.
After WWII, the development of turbine engines led to higher altitude flight. The need for pressurized aircraft pervaded aviation. Semimonocoque construction needed to be made even stronger as a result.
Refinements to the all-metal semimonocoque fuselage structure were made to increase strength and combat metal fatigue caused by the pressurization- depressurization cycle. Rounded windows and door openings were developed to avoid weak areas where cracks could form. Integrally machined copper alloy aluminum skin resisted cracking and allowed thicker skin and controlled tapering.
Chemical milling of wing skin structures provided great strength and smooth high- performance surfaces. Variable contour wings became easier to construct. Increases in flight speed accompanying jet travel brought about the need for thinner wings. Wing loading also increased greatly. Multispar and box beam wing designs were developed in response.
In the 1960s, ever larger aircraft were developed to carry passengers. As engine technology improved, the jumbo jet was engineered and built. Still primarily aluminum with a semimonocoque fuselage, the sheer size of the airliners of the day initiated a search for lighter and stronger materials from which to build them. The use of honeycomb constructed panels in Boeing’s airline series saved weight while not compromising strength. Initially, aluminum core with aluminum or fiberglass skin sandwich panels were used on wing panels, flight control surfaces, cabin floor boards, and other applications.
A steady increase in the use of honeycomb and foam core sandwich components and a wide variety of composite materials characterizes the state of aviation structures from the 1970s to the present. Advanced techniques and material combinations have resulted in a gradual shift from aluminum to carbon fiber and other strong, lightweight materials. These new materials are engineered to meet specific performance requirements for various components on the aircraft. Many airframe structures are made of more than 50 percent advanced composites,
with some airframes approaching 100 percent. The term “very light jet” (VLJ) has come to describe a new generation of jet aircraft made almost entirely of advanced composite materials. [Figure 1-10] It is possible that noncomposite aluminum aircraft structures will become obsolete as did the methods and materials of construction used by Cayley, Lilienthal, and the Wright Brothers.
REVIEW:
materials were thus invented. philosophy of searching for a lighter or more robust structure. try to improve strength, reduce density or both.
You should be able to complete the activity within 30 minutes.
Academic Honesty Clause
Plagiarism is the use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one’s original work. (1995 Random House Compact Unabridged Dictionary)
In the academe, it is an adaption or reproduction of an original intellectual creation, be it concepts, ideas, methods, pieces of information or expressions of another author, whether individual, group, or organization without proper acknowledgment. Moreover, plagiarism can range from borrowing a particular phrase or sentence to paraphrasing someone else’s original idea without citing it. The most common form of plagiarism, especially nowadays, is copying and pasting online material without crediting the source.
Every student must practice Academic Honesty. Academic misconduct is subject to an academic penalty by the instructor and/or disciplinary sanction by the College.
I _____________________________ fully understood the definition and description of plagiarism stated above and I am familiar with the Student Conduct Code. I am aware that I shall be penalized if plagiarism is found evident on my output which includes, gaining a failing grade.
As a college student and a member of scholarly community, I shall value other people’s ideas. Thus, I pledged to commit to the following truthful statements:
_______________________
(Signature over Printed Name)
REFERENCES:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-collegesuccess-lumen1/chapter/academic-honesty/
https://www.business.umt.edu/ethics/academic-honesty.php
ESSAY RUBRIC
CRITERIA | INADEQUATE (Below Standard) 65%-74% | ADEQUATE (Meets Standard) 75%-84% | ABOVE AVERAGE (Exceeds Standard) 85%-92% | EXEMPLARY (Far Exceeds Standard) 93%-100% | SCORE |
Organization | Writing lacks logical organization. It | Writing is coherent and logically organized. | Writing is coherent and logically | Writing shows high degree of attention to | |
shows some | Some points remain | organized with | logic and reasoning | ||
coherence but ideas | misplaced and stray | transitions used | of points. Unity | ||
lack unity. Serious | from the topic. | between ideas and | clearly leads the | ||
errors. | Transitions evident but | paragraphs to create | reader to the | ||
not used throughout | coherence. Overall | conclusion and stirs | |||
essay. | unity of ideas is | thought regarding the | |||
present. | topic. | ||||
Level of Content | Shows some thinking and reasoning but | Content indicates thinking and reasoning | Content indicates original thinking and | Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in- | |
most ideas are | applied with original | develops ideas with | depth analysis and | ||
underdeveloped and | thought on a few ideas. | sufficient and firm | evidences original | ||
unoriginal. | evidence. | thought and support | |||
for the topic. | |||||
Development | Main points lack detailed development. | Main points are present with limited detail and | Main points well developed with | Main points well developed with high | |
Ideas are vague with | development. Some | quality supporting | quality and quantity | ||
little evidence of | critical thinking is | details and quantity. | support. Reveals high | ||
critical thinking. | present. | Critical thinking is | degree of critical | ||
weaved into points. | thinking. | ||||
Grammar & Mechanics | Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create | Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct | Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical | Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and | |
distraction, making | allowing reader to | errors allowing reader | grammatical errors; | ||
reading difficult; | progress the essay. | to follow ideas | absent of fragments, | ||
fragments, comma | Some errors remain. | clearly. Very few | comma splices, and | ||
splices, run-ons | fragments or run-ons. | run-ons. | |||
evident. Errors are | |||||
frequent. | |||||
GRADE (score/4) |