Title: Sport, Climate Change & Environmental Justice [Part 2] Socio-Cultural Perspectives in Kinesiology© Hayhurst, 2025
Agenda:
Quick Recap: Environmental Justice Framework
Transition: From Theory to Material Realities in Sport
Planned Obsolescence in the Bicycle Industry
The Circular Economy Explained (Video & Discussion)
Sport and the Environment: Broader Perspectives
Ecological Modernism vs. Structural Change
Group Discussion & Q&A
Recap: Environmental Justice Key Concepts:
Climate Change & Environmental Justice
Three EJ Dimensions (Chen & Kellison, 2022):
Distributive Justice: Who bears the burdens?
Procedural Justice: Who has a voice?
Recognition Justice: Whose knowledge is valued?
Sport’s Dual Role: Contributor to and catalyst for environmental change.
Bridging Theory to Material Reality:
The importance of studying production and consumption in sport.
Uncovering "hidden" environmental costs.
Linking abstract EJ ideas to everyday products (Chen & Kellison, 2023).
Planned Obsolescence in Sport (Szto & Wilson, 2022):
Definition: Designing products for a short lifespan (Maycroft, 2009).
Drives frequent replacement and disposal, leading to excess waste and environmental harm.
Case Study: The Bicycle Industry (Szto & Wilson, 2022):
Cycling is sustainable as an activity, but faces product lifecycle issues.
Key Issues Identified:
Excess waste from production and disposal.
Non-standard, incompatible components.
"Crash replacement" policies encouraging discarding.
The sustainability paradox.
The Circular Economy: Key Principles:
Shift from "take-make-waste" to "reuse-repair-recycle".
Focus on product longevity and adaptability.
Extended Producer Responsibility:
Manufacturers accountable for the entire lifecycle (McDonough & Braungart, 2002; World Economic Forum, 2017).
Circular Economy in Practice:
Examples in sport include:
Repair and refurbishment programs.
Sustainable bike-sharing systems.
Incentives for returns for recycling.
Benefits: Reduced waste and lower resource consumption.
Implications for Policy & Practice:
Mandate sustainable design regulations.
Extend producer responsibility.
Engage consumers and communities in lifecycle decisions.
Sport and the Environment: A Broader Perspective:
Sport as a tool for development and sustainability.
UN Initiatives:
Promoting sport for peace and development (2005, 2018).
NGOs' actions:
Mathare Youth Sports Association.
Surfers Environmental Alliance.
The paradox of pro-environment messaging vs. negative impacts (Darnell & Millington, 2023).
Beyond the Paradox: Toward Sustainable Sport:
Reconciling sport’s positive messaging with material realities.
Innovative initiatives to reduce environmental footprints.
Emphasizing community engagement and policy reform.
Ecological Modernism vs. Structural Change:
Ecological Modernism:
Focuses on technological fixes and clean technologies.
Minimal regulation approach (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
Critique: Economic interests may override social/environmental needs leading to superficial fixes.
Beyond Technological Fixes: Toward Structural Change:
Rethinking production models and policies.
Integrating sustainability with social responsibility.
Addressing systemic inequities in production practices (Chen & Kellison, 2023).
Sport, Production, and Social Impact:
Production practices reflect broader social inequities.
Unsustainable lifecycles carry hidden social costs.
Importance of integrating sustainable production with social responsibility (Chen & Kellison, 2023; Szto & Wilson, 2022).
Future Directions: Sport and the Environment:
Exploring new designs and repair methods for sport products.
Assessing practical policy implementations for lifecycle responsibility.
Engaging local communities in decision-making processes.
Creative approaches to balancing fun in sport with environmental responsibility.
Accountability for Sustainable Products:
Importance of holding companies accountable for the product lifecycle to enhance sustainability and fairness for communities.
Key Takeaways:
EJ Framework (distributive, procedural, recognition) guides analysis.
Planned obsolescence in bicycle industry exemplifies unsustainable production (Szto & Wilson, 2022).
The circular economy and Extended Producer Responsibility offer promising alternatives.
Limits of ecological modernism necessitate structural change (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
A holistic approach is essential for linking environmental and social outcomes (Chen & Kellison, 2023).