Lecture Details
Title: Integrated Marketing Communication
Lecture: 5B
Instructor: Dr. Max Yu
Institution: Maynooth University, National University of Ireland
Types of Stakeholders:
Media
Clients
Target Audience
Agencies
Production and Support Companies
Examples of Companies:
Specsavers
JAGUAR
P&G (Procter & Gamble)
Anheuser-Busch
Unilever
Options for Marketing Services:
Freelancers
Consultants
External Agencies
platforms to find agencies:
Sortlist: Connects clients with potential agencies
Magneto IT Solutions (UK)
Various agencies offering different scales of service ranging from €1,000 to €10,000 per project
Benefits:
Overall cost and benefit considerations
Access to expertise
Objective perspectives
Enhanced interactions with other departments
Agency Categories:
Full-service or Integrated Agencies: Offer a wide range of services including strategic planning, research, and media buying. E.g., J. Walter Thompson, Leo Burnett.
Creative Agencies: Specialize in creative services such as copywriting and developing content.
Media Agencies: Focus on media strategies, consulting on planning and buying media space.
Digital Agencies: Offer services like digital media planning, SEO, and online campaigns.
Search Agencies: Specialize in driving web traffic through search advertising and SEO.
Social Media Agencies: Provide community management, content development, and crisis management.
Direct Marketing Agencies: Focus on offline and online direct response media, including telemarketing.
Branded Content Agencies: Specialize in creating digital content primarily for online platforms.
Key Brands and Their Budgets (2017):
Sky UK: £197.1 million
Procter & Gamble: £196.8 million
BT: £144.1 million
Unilever UK: £116.8 million
McDonald's: £96.2 million
Tesco: £89.5 million
Reckitt Benckiser: £88.2 million
Virgin Media: £72.1 million
Lidl UK: £71.1 million
Samsung UK: £66.6 million
Budgeting Advantages:
Provides clarity on costs vs. benefits
Assures objectives are achievable
Facilitates cross-department coordination
Supports review and improvement of marketing strategies
Various Approaches:
Marginal Analysis: Assessing additional sales generated from extra spending.
Arbitrary Method: Decisions based solely on leadership’s discretion, often leading to neglect of customer needs.
Inertia Method: Continuing previous budget without assessing current environment or needs.
Media Multiplier: Adjusting budget based on relative media cost fluctuations.
Percentage of Sales: Allocating budget based on a percentage of past sales, which may not consider future demands.
Affordable Method: Setting budget based on what remains after covering other costs, lacking in analytical depth.
Objective and Task: Budget based on resources needed to achieve specific goals.
Competitive Parity: Matching competitors’ ad spending without considering qualitative differences.
Advertising-to-Sales Ratio: Evaluating own ad spend versus industry averages.
Share of Voice: Comparing individual ad spends against total competitor spending.
Combination of Heuristics and Algorithmic Tools: Examining how U.S. advertisers set budgets, and how culture and organizational experience influence them.
Key Benefits:
Relatively low cost
Attributable outcomes
Data-driven strategies
Highly targetable
Challenges of Algorithms: Evidence that algorithms may unintentionally perpetuate biases similar to human discrimination.
Historical examples include Amazon's canceled hiring tool and biased credit offers by Apple.
Studies on racial discrimination in online ads and unintended gender biases within online advertising
Observation on Click Rates: Studies show that women are more likely to click on ads and make purchases across various products.
Displays advertising to women command higher bids compared to men in ad platforms like Facebook.
Overall Implications: Understanding the implications of advertising strategies helps in improving decision-making, budgeting, and optimizing ad targeting.
Questions?
Contact: Maynooth University