week 1
SciencesPo
Course Title: Law and Society
Instructor: Bruno Sousa Rodrigues
Semester: Spring 2024/2025
Date: 30/01/2025
Key discussion points:
Overview of the course and grading system
Definition of law
Relationship between law and society
Role of social theory in the study of law
Course Sessions:
Session 1: Is law an autonomous system?
Session 2: Law beyond legal rules
Session 3: Suits and robes – the crafts of law in the 21st century
Session 4: Law and the State
Session 5: Constitutionalism and the rule of law
Session 6: Crime and punishment (Criminal law)
Session 7: Individuals and market exchanges (Private law)
Session 8: Citizenship and foreignness
Session 9: Legal pluralism without borders
Session 11: Human rights: potential and limitations
Session 12: Mobilization of legal practice for social resistance and change
Assessment Overview:
Group presentation: 30%
Mid-term exam: 20%
Final essay: 40%
Class participation: 10%
Group Presentation:
Collective grade, maximum 15 minutes
Criteria: time management, organization, case familiarity, critical reasoning
Submission: outline, bibliography, and debate question due one week before presentation.
Mid-term Exam:
Date: 13 March 2025
Format: 10 multiple choice questions, duration 30 minutes
Final Essay:
Date assigned: Session 9 (3 April 2025)
Length: 750 words; submission due 24 April 2025
Title: Election of Class Delegate
Related to the Law and Society Course
Question posed: How do you define law?
Definition: Law as a social order
Regulates mutual behavior among humans
Set of rules prescribing behavior or norms
Misconception: Law vs. order; they are intrinsically linked.
Quotation from Hans Kelsen highlights the tautology in law discussing order.
Understanding the law:
Differentiation between what is decided by courts and theoretical concepts of law.
Perspective of the 'bad man': Law as practical prophecies of court actions rather than ethical axioms.
Quotation from Oliver Wendell Holmes emphasizes practical law over abstract theories.
Judicial Constraints and Practices:
Judges constrained by rules but must administer justice in practice.
Discretion is limited but human elements in law cannot be ignored.
Quotation from Roscoe Pound reflects on the reality versus law theory.
Key Thinkers:
Kelsen, Holmes, Pound recognize law as a social phenomenon.
Kelsen focuses on structural organization of norms.
Holmes and Pound emphasize operational aspects in law administration.
Shift from natural law to law as a social construct.
Questions the necessity of law in isolation (e.g., deserted island).
Investigating the connection between law and social structures.
Definition of Social Theory:
Methodical, historically informed, and empirical study of social life.
Explores collective existence and individual roles within society.
Encompasses diverse phenomena: institutions, networks, and social dynamics (solidarity, identity, power).
Approaches to studying law:
Communicative aspects: focus on legal texts and discourse.
Behavior of legal agents (judges, legislators) and their societal roles.
Law as a tool for ideological domination or political struggle.
Overview of classical social theory's emergence in relation to law.
Quote from Marx:
Law is an expression of class interests and economic conditions.
Quote from Durkheim:
Law and morality create social bonds in response to industrial changes.
Inquiries into the origins of law within rational capitalist interests and cultural rationalism.
Focus on the text regarding the normative aspects of law.
Institutional viewpoint on law emphasizes organized actions and activities.
Law's role in sustaining social groups; law is an interaction between people and rules.
Various functions law serves:
Mediation of conflicts
Regulation of behavior
Political power allocation
Promotion of social integration and improvement of legal practice.
Law as a craft involving distinct skills and practices among legal professionals.
Discusses how legal professionals’ roles affect their legal reasoning and practice.
Niklas Luhmann: Law as an autopoietic communication system stabilizing expectations.
Pierre Bourdieu: Law as a semi-autonomous field of practice.
Exploration of law's role in organizing everyday life.
End of session notes. Looking forward to next week!
Objectives:
Discuss implications of viewing law as a professional practice based on Pierre Bourdieu's insights.
Analyze law through the lens of physical objects in practice, drawing from Bruno Latour's contributions.
Engage in a debate regarding forces affecting legal practice's production and reproduction.
Key Concept: The distinction between juridical field as social space vs. system (Luhmann).
Bourdieu critiques that legal structures being self-referential confuses symbolic order with the social system.
The juridical field holds objective relations among competing actors for control over legal interpretation.
Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law:
Represents formalist thinkers' battle against social constraints in law.
This ideological stance ignores the independency of the juridical field from external influences.
Instrumentalist View:
Law as a reflection of social power dynamics.
Bourdieu sees both perspectives as failing to account for the complexity of the juridical field.
Definition of Juridical Field:
A space of competition among actors for monopoly over legal interpretation.
The field fosters separation between legal professionals and non-experts, rationalizing the legal system further.
Result: Creates a disconnect between legal judgment and everyday perceptions of fairness.
Legal professionals play crucial roles in transforming societal conflicts into regulated legal debates.
They interpret legal texts and redefine issues into legal problems impacting client relationships.
The juridical field is marked by a professional monopoly on legal services production and distribution.
Opposition between theorists and practitioners generates a symbolic struggle.
Boundaries of participation in the juridical field exclude those lacking necessary technical mastery.
This dynamic reinforces professional authority, overshadowing common sense views of justice.
Vis Formae: Legal formalization shapes practices leading to social modifications.
Legal judgments serve as performative acts that establish social realities and norms.
Decisions by authorities are seen as universally recognized truths carrying significant symbolic power.
Legal habitus structures perceptions and judgments which guide resolutions of conflicts.
Adaptation of legal supply to demand reflects social hierarchies influencing power relations within the field.
Lower-status legal professionals often reinforce existing power dynamics rather than challenging them.
Latour’s exploration highlights the distinct nature of law compared to politics and economics.
He critiques instrumental views, emphasizing the relational character of law and its role in connecting various entities.
Latour's study of the Conseil d’État reveals insights into the functioning of uncodified law.
Engagement with the institution demonstrates law’s complexity and its material elements, like files.
The process begins with simple claims initiating a complex legal dialogue.
File Lifecycle: A legal 'file' evolves as it garners documents and undergoes various stages of processing.
The act of creating a legal file forms a bridge between raw grievances and official legal documentation.
The reporter's role connects initial complaints to established legal texts, emphasizing the tenuous nature of this connection.
Consider how societal, institutional, and professional forces shape the legal landscape and affect practice.
This session reiterates the complexity of understanding law through both sociological and material lenses, highlighting the ongoing debates and challenges within legal practices.
week 3
Explore the protagonists of the legal profession in the 21st century.
Discuss the organization of the Bar inspired by Tanina Rostain’s insights.
Engage in a debate on whether the rule of law implies the rule of lawyers.
Examine the historical foundations of legal professions based on Raoul Van Caenegem’s work.
Analyze the impact of AI on the future of legal professions.
Different types of judges, examples include:
Judges at the International Court of Justice.
Judges at the Cour de Cassation.
Judges at the Japanese Supreme Court.
Categories of lawyers:
Brazilian lawyers.
Italian lawyers.
Nigerian lawyers.
Examples of prosecutors:
Prosecutor of Paris.
Attorney-General of India.
Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.
Examples of law professors:
Law professors in France.
Law professors in Portugal.
Barack Obama when he was a law professor.
Discussion point: How do the professional divisions within the legal field impact the practice of law?
Overview of socio-legal scholarship exploring attorney authority through:
The organized bar.
Corporate and personal legal services.
Professionalism as a collective mobility project aimed at economic rewards and prestige.
Production of Producers: The bar controls legal training and sets formal education requirements enforced through the bar exam.
Market Competition: Restrictions established by the bar to maintain monopoly, including control over competition and advertising:
Example: Division of legal professions into solicitors and barristers in the UK.
Ethics and Guidelines: The bar enacts ethical codes and guidelines for legal services, discovery procedures, and conflicts of interest.
Transition from independent practice to bureaucratic specialized practice with corporate law firms.
Claims of independence by corporate law firms justified through long-standing client relationships and impartial advice.
Shift in ideology from independence to partisanship emphasizing the interests of clients.
Three dynamics observed:
Traditional Lawyers: Operate in small firms, focus on human aspects, and have lower status.
Entrepreneurial Lawyers: Operate in large firms, mass production approach, and emphasize efficiency.
Boutique Personal Lawyers: Specialized expertise, focus on high-end issues, and command higher fees.
Traditional and entrepreneurial lawyers face competition from:
Paraprofessionals offering legal services.
“Lawtech” start-ups using technology to automate routine legal work.
Discussion point: Does the 'rule of law' imply the 'rule of lawyers'?
Historical context of legal professionals and litigation's socio-economic impact in Rome during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries.
Growth in complexity of judicial procedures led to reliance on trained advocates and proctors by the late twelfth century.
Shift from lay judges to appointed professionals in early medieval courts.
Role of the Church in developing early professional standards in law.
The gradual rise of professional judges led to increased autonomy and status, especially post seventeenth century.
Early courts exhibited participatory elements with public appraisals of judges' decisions. -Diminished public involvement over the centuries in judicial proceedings.
Judges historically appraised and processed subjects without regard for rank, reflecting changes in social structures.
Judge-made law reflects oligarchic interests, prioritizing stability over equality.
Codification emerged as a challenge to traditional judicial power.
Jurists historically served power structures, leveraging legal ideas to influence political movements.
Speculative discussion on how AI will reshape legal practice and the roles within the profession.
week 4
Key Topics:
Finalize discussions on historical origins of the legal profession.
Political centralization and its influence on law (Insights from Saskia Sassen).
The importance of State sovereignty in legal organization.
Limitations to State legality and the distinction between law and morality (Insights from H.L.A. Hart).
Historical Insights on Legal Business:
Criticism of the engagement of curia and lawyers in promoting litigation for profit.
Lawyers in the papal curia contributed significantly to Rome's economy during the 12th and 13th centuries.
Litigation increased demand for legal professionals, benefiting various sectors of the economy (shops, inns, etc.).
The rise of lawyers coincided with an influx of litigants, not as a cause of the litigation surge.
Legal Profession's Role in Canonical Litigation:
Advocates and legal professionals became crucial in the late 12th century due to complex court procedures.
By 1200, self-representation in litigation was discouraged; expert legal aid was deemed essential.
Historical Judicial Structures:
Early courts lacked regularly appointed judges; Frankish judges chosen per case until Charlemagne instituted lifetime appointees.
Judges initially had non-professional backgrounds yet began developing a form of professionalism.
Understanding of judicial professionalism progressed within the Church from traditional courts to trained legal officials.
Judicial Independence:
The rise of judicial professionalism correlated with judges gaining independence from political influences.
By the early 18th century, judges achieved irremovability barring extreme circumstances (i.e., parliamentary request).
French judicial positions often became private property through office purchase, complicating royal control.
Judicial Processes in Early Societies:
Description of ancient Greek courts: judges proposed judgments with public approval, illustrating early community involvement in justice.
Over time, public participation in the judicial process diminished.
State Sovereignty as Absolute Power:
Sovereignty defined as the absolute authority of a commonwealth; laws depend on the sovereign.
Contracts differ from laws; the sovereign cannot bind himself as laws are one-sided.
Jurisdictional Authority:
Definition of territorial sovereignty as exclusive rights over land, air, and sea.
Monism and Dualism Explained:
Monism: law viewed as a unified whole derived from a common source.
Dualism: distinction made between international law (governing states) and municipal law (governing individuals).
Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Recognizes the inherent dignity and equal rights of all individuals as foundational to justice and peace.
Distinction between Law and Morality:
Legal positivism allows for a value-neutral analysis of law, separating it from moral considerations.
Law is seen as set by a sovereign entity, applicable to subjects under its jurisdiction.
Reflection on the Interrelation of Law and Morality:
Ongoing dialogues in legal theory regarding the connection and separation of law from moral imperatives.
Course Details:
Title: Law and Society
Instructor: Bruno Sousa Rodrigues
Semester: Spring 2024/2025
Session 1 Overview:
Overview of the course and grading system
Definition of law
Relationship between law and society
Role of social theory in the study of law
Course Sessions:
Is law an autonomous system?
Law beyond legal rules
Suits and robes – the crafts of law in the 21st century
Law and the State
Constitutionalism and the rule of law
Crime and punishment (Criminal law)
Individuals and market exchanges (Private law)
Citizenship and foreignness
Legal pluralism without borders
Human rights: potential and limitations
Mobilization of legal practice for social resistance and change
Grading System:
Group presentation: 30%
Mid-term exam: 20%
Final essay: 40%
Class participation: 10%
Objectives:
Discuss implications of viewing law as a professional practice.
Analyze law through Pierre Bourdieu’s insights.
Debate forces affecting legal practice.
Key Concepts:
Juridical Field: Space of competition for legal interpretation.
Formalism vs. Instrumentalism: Different views on the role of law in society.
Mediation Role of Legal Professionals: Legal professionals transform conflicts into regulated debates.
Legal Habit: Structures perceptions and influences judgments in the legal field.
Protagonists of the Legal Profession:
Judges, Lawyers, Prosecutors, Professors
Insights from Tanina Rostain:
Authority of lawyers and the organized bar's control over legal training and market competition.
Legal Professionals Impact:
Traditional, Entrepreneurial, and Boutique Lawyers; vulnerabilities in legal services.
Discussion on "Rule of Law" vs. "Rule of Lawyers."
Key Topics:
Historical context of the legal profession and the rise of judges.
Distinctions between sovereignty, law, and morality.
Key Concepts:
Sovereignty: Absolute power of the state and its legal authority.
Monism vs. Dualism in law: Differences in the understanding of international vs. national law.
Human Rights: Foundation of justice and peace as recognized in global declarations.
Legal Positivism Insights:
Distinction between law and morality; the role of the sovereign in creating law.
Ongoing discussions on the interrelation of law and morality and the complexities of legal practice throughout history.
This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the key points discussed in each week of the course, helping in revising critical concepts related to Law and Society as structured by the instructor.