Types of Data Collection Methods

Key Learning Objectives

  • Identify and describe different methods of data collection, and their strengths and weaknesses.

  • Explain the role of naturalistic observation, case studies and surveys in psychological research.

Types of Data Collection Methods

Primary vs. Secondary Data Collection

  • Primary data collection: Direct methods of data collection:

    • Surveys: Questionnaires, interviews, experiments.

  • Secondary data collection: Indirect methods:

    • Sources include documents, articles, etc.

    • Often used in meta-analysis to systematically assess previous research and derive conclusions (e.g., Clark and Stansfeld, 2007).

Research Approaches

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Methods

  • Quantitative methods: Use of questionnaires and tests.

  • Qualitative methods: Use of interviews, observations, and documents.

Table 2.3 Summary

Quantitative Methods
  • Standardised tests: Assess ability to solve problems and apply knowledge, commonly norm-referenced.

  • Questionnaires: Economical, quick methods to gather participants' feelings and beliefs. Challenges include time-consuming design and potential low motivation if lengthy.

    • Importance of clearly phrased questions to avoid confusion (e.g., double-barrelled and leading questions).

Qualitative Methods
  • Interviews: Gather profound insights into participant experiences and opinions, can be time-consuming.

    • Types:

      • Face-to-face

      • Telephone or online

      • Focus group interview

  • Observations: Study behavior in natural or lab settings.

    • Types: Naturalistic vs. laboratory observation.

  • Documents: Various types including personal, public, and archival documents providing rich data sources.

Quantitative Data Collection Methods

Standardised Tests

  • Measure problem-solving ability and knowledge application, often compared to age norms.

  • Offer insights into personality traits but can be costly and time-consuming.

Questionnaires

  • Economical, simultaneous administration, but risk low returns if perceived as lengthy.

    • Importance of clear wording, avoiding double-barrelled and leading questions to maintain data integrity.

Qualitative Data Collection Methods

Interviews

  • Provide in-depth experiences. Categories:

    • Face-to-face: More personal but resource-intensive.

    • Telephone/Online: Cost-effective, can reach diverse samples but risk participant hesitation.

    • Focus group: Provides diversity and interaction but challenges include moderator effectiveness and data analysis difficulties.

Structured vs. Unstructured Interviews

  • Structured: Pre-determined questions, same order for all participants (e.g., 'Who supported you at university?').

  • Unstructured: Conversational, exploratory (e.g., 'Tell me about your experience as a student president.').

  • Semi-Structured: Predetermined and follow-up questions (e.g., career challenges).

Naturalistic and Laboratory Observations

Naturalistic Observation

  • Observing behavior in natural settings without interference (e.g., observing cell phone use among students).

  • Advantages: Greater ecological validity, can reveal phenomena that can’t be replicated in lab.

  • Disadvantages: Difficult to generalize and replicate, behavior might alter due to observer presence.

    • Example study: Koen and Durrheim (2010) on segregation in lecture halls.

Laboratory Observation

  • Conducted in controlled settings, more control over variables increasing internal validity.

  • Concerns about real-world applicability despite ease of replication (e.g., Milgram experiment).

Documents in Research

Types of Documents

  • Include personal documents (diaries), public documents (university records), archival records (service records).

  • Challenges: Difficulty in making generalizations from document analysis.

Conclusion

Concept Check Questions

  1. People's attitudes about social issues? (Method: survey)

  2. Experiences of anxiety disorder sufferers? (Method: case study)

  3. Territoriality in animal behavior? (Method: naturalistic observation)

  4. Influence of food-related cues? (Method: experiment)

robot