Identify and describe different methods of data collection, and their strengths and weaknesses.
Explain the role of naturalistic observation, case studies and surveys in psychological research.
Primary data collection: Direct methods of data collection:
Surveys: Questionnaires, interviews, experiments.
Secondary data collection: Indirect methods:
Sources include documents, articles, etc.
Often used in meta-analysis to systematically assess previous research and derive conclusions (e.g., Clark and Stansfeld, 2007).
Quantitative methods: Use of questionnaires and tests.
Qualitative methods: Use of interviews, observations, and documents.
Standardised tests: Assess ability to solve problems and apply knowledge, commonly norm-referenced.
Questionnaires: Economical, quick methods to gather participants' feelings and beliefs. Challenges include time-consuming design and potential low motivation if lengthy.
Importance of clearly phrased questions to avoid confusion (e.g., double-barrelled and leading questions).
Interviews: Gather profound insights into participant experiences and opinions, can be time-consuming.
Types:
Face-to-face
Telephone or online
Focus group interview
Observations: Study behavior in natural or lab settings.
Types: Naturalistic vs. laboratory observation.
Documents: Various types including personal, public, and archival documents providing rich data sources.
Measure problem-solving ability and knowledge application, often compared to age norms.
Offer insights into personality traits but can be costly and time-consuming.
Economical, simultaneous administration, but risk low returns if perceived as lengthy.
Importance of clear wording, avoiding double-barrelled and leading questions to maintain data integrity.
Provide in-depth experiences. Categories:
Face-to-face: More personal but resource-intensive.
Telephone/Online: Cost-effective, can reach diverse samples but risk participant hesitation.
Focus group: Provides diversity and interaction but challenges include moderator effectiveness and data analysis difficulties.
Structured: Pre-determined questions, same order for all participants (e.g., 'Who supported you at university?').
Unstructured: Conversational, exploratory (e.g., 'Tell me about your experience as a student president.').
Semi-Structured: Predetermined and follow-up questions (e.g., career challenges).
Observing behavior in natural settings without interference (e.g., observing cell phone use among students).
Advantages: Greater ecological validity, can reveal phenomena that can’t be replicated in lab.
Disadvantages: Difficult to generalize and replicate, behavior might alter due to observer presence.
Example study: Koen and Durrheim (2010) on segregation in lecture halls.
Conducted in controlled settings, more control over variables increasing internal validity.
Concerns about real-world applicability despite ease of replication (e.g., Milgram experiment).
Include personal documents (diaries), public documents (university records), archival records (service records).
Challenges: Difficulty in making generalizations from document analysis.
People's attitudes about social issues? (Method: survey)
Experiences of anxiety disorder sufferers? (Method: case study)
Territoriality in animal behavior? (Method: naturalistic observation)
Influence of food-related cues? (Method: experiment)