International Law and Human Rights
International Law and Human Rights
Effectiveness of International Law in Restraining State Behavior
Overview of International Law
Derives from:
Tradition
Agreements signed by states
Lacks a central authority or legislative branch.
Varies in enforcement difficulty based on:
Reciprocity
Collective action
International norms
Sources of International Law
Declarations of the UN General Assembly
Do not constitute binding laws for members.
Treaties and Written Conventions
Most crucial source of international law.
Binding on successor governments regardless of changing circumstances.
Custom
Recognized as the second major source of international law.
Great Principles of Law
Serve as a source of international law.
Legal Scholarship
Fourth source, involving academic contributions.
Enforcement of International Law
Challenges in Enforcement
Difficult to enforce for the following reasons:
Reciprocity: States may only comply if others do the same.
General or Long-Term Costs: Consequences of disregarding international law can affect future relations and stability.
Collective Response: Effectiveness often requires a united front from multiple states.
Laws of Diplomacy
Respect for Diplomatic Rights:
Fundamental to international law.
Includes several key aspects:
Diplomatic Recognition: Validates credentials of diplomats.
Occupancy Rights: Diplomats can treat embassies as their own territory.
Diplomatic Immunity: Protection from legal prosecution in the host country (e.g., Espionage scenarios).
Just-War Doctrine
Wars Distinction
Differentiates between:
Just wars (legal)
Wars of aggression (illegal).
Legal Framework
Defined by the UN Charter which:
Outlaws aggression while permitting "international police actions."
International Norm
States possess the right to respond to aggression, sanctioned use of military force.
The doctrine excludes uses of war for:
Changing policies or governments
Ethnic or religious conflicts.
Individual Rights Versus Sovereignty
Human Rights Implications
Human rights notion conflicts with state sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Lack of consensus on key human rights, derived from:
Religion: Embodies dignity and respect for individuals.
Political and Legal Philosophy: Roots in natural law.
Political Revolutions of the 18th Century: Examples include revolutions in the U.S. and France.
Categorization of Human Rights
Divided into two primary types:
Civil-Political Rights (Negative Rights): Focus on freedoms from interference.
Economic-Social Rights (Positive Rights): Entitlement to certain benefits or standards of living.
Global Instruments:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
Convention Against Torture (CAT, 1987).
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC, 1990): Widely ratified with exceptions (Somalia, the U.S.).
Role of International Organizations in Human Rights
Importance of International Organizations (IOs):
Facilitate the protection of human rights globally.
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) increasingly crucial in advocating for basic political rights in authoritarian states.
Global Human Rights Regime
Concept Definition
Human rights as inalienable rights transcend state boundaries.
Historical Context
World War II marks a pivotal moment—ideology employed to emphasize rights and freedoms.
The Holocaust significantly influenced human rights discourse.
Tension Between Universal Rights and State Sovereignty at the UN Level
Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Rooted in UN Charter; balances state sovereignty with international norms.
Encounters enforcement challenges.
Creation of Human Rights Treaties:
Steps include:
Drafting language
Signing of treaty
Ratification of treaty
Formation of treaty committee.
Prevalence of Treaty Ratification
Most states have ratified key treaties, but American exceptionalism remains significant.
Ratification Statistics (e.g., CEDAW)
Represented graphically (spec numbers not depicted here) showing incremental increase in ratification over years.
UN Human Rights Institutions
Key Entities:
Human Rights Council.
Special Rapporteurs.
Commissions of Inquiry.
High Commissioner for Human Rights.
International Criminal Court (ICC): Governed by the Rome Statute with principles of complementarity.
Regional Approaches to Human Rights
Advantages:
Collaboration among like-minded states.
Enhanced state control over enforcement mechanisms.
Disadvantages:
Lack of universality.
Regional organizations can act as shields against critique.
Regional Systems Overview
European Human Rights System:
Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights.
European Union.
Latin American Human Rights System:
Organization of American States.
American Convention on Human Rights.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
African Human Rights System:
African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.
African Court on Human and People’s Rights.
Southeast Asian Human Rights System:
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights.
Human Rights Risk Analysis
Human Rights Risk Index:
High-risk regions correlate with weaker regional human rights organizations.
Roles of Non-State Human Rights Actors
Domestic Human Rights Organizations:
Utilization of both broad and specific focus strategies; often engage in “naming and shaming.”
International Human Rights Organizations:
Similar naming and shaming tactics, broader or targeted focus, sometimes provide local expertise.
Transnational Advocacy Networks:
Coalitions working toward change, e.g., campaigns like “Save Darfur,” “Kony 2012.”
Engagement Strategies:
Engaging global forces to facilitate change: Enhancing credibility and serving communication purposes.
Challenges of Human Rights Enforcement
Issues of Enforcement:
Delivery of enforcement often weak with violators evading punishment.
Necessities for states to comply with International Criminal Court orders.
Issues of Compliance:
Compliance incentives differ from other international treaties, relying on mutual benefits.
Risks of human rights commitments becoming “cheap talk.”
Differential Powers of Human Rights Systems:
Effectiveness contingent on specific political conditions.
Highlights importance of political opposition and civil society.
Social Norm Internalization:
Cultivating normative standards leads to gradual internalization and behavioral change in governments and citizens.