Principles of the Law on Use of Force
Military Necessity: Using force only when required to achieve a legitimate military objective.
Caroline Test: Defines conditions for self-defense as "necessity" being immediate, overwhelming, and leaving no alternative.
Proportionality: Ensuring the force used is appropriate to the threat and not excessive.
Evolution of Law
Hague Law: Early international agreements regulating war conduct.
1928 Pact of Paris (Kellogg-Briand Pact): Renounced war as a tool of national policy.
1945 UN Charter: Core framework governing use of force in international relations.
Article 2(4): Prohibits the use of force except in specific exceptions.
Article 51: Recognizes the right to self-defense in response to an armed attack.
Permissive v. Restrictive Readings
Permissive: Allows broader interpretations of self-defense and intervention.
Restrictive: Limits force strictly to self-defense or Security Council authorization.
Customary International Law of Interventions
Exceptions
Security Council Authorization
Explicit: Direct approval of force.
Implicit: Actions tacitly supported by the Council.
Self-Defense
Armed Attack: Must meet the gravity threshold to justify force.
Preemptive Self-Defense: Controversial and debated in legality.
Other Potential Exceptions
Protecting Nationals
Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect
Consent- Use of force is lawful with the host state's permission