Understanding contract law is essential for determining the enforceability of agreements made between parties.
Scenario involves a restaurant reservation with specific terms: customers must refrain from using phones.
An engagement takes place at the restaurant; a patron violates the agreement by using their phone.
The core question arises: Are they obligated to pay for their meal due to the breach of contract?
Not all promises form legally enforceable contracts; only those meeting legal specifications are enforceable.
Important to differentiate between everyday promises and legally binding agreements.
Agreement: Comprises both an offer and acceptance.
Consideration: Each party must provide something of value.
Capacity: Parties must have legal competence to enter contracts.
Consent: Free from coercion or undue pressure.
Legal Purpose: The contract must be for a lawful objective.
Examples of non-enforceable promises:
Casual commitments among friends (e.g., "I'll be there in five minutes").
Lack of intention to be legally bound.
Illustrative cases in class focused on various types of agreements, such as those between classmates and social contexts.
Interactive session with students to discuss their understanding of contracts.
Example invoking humor with prom proposal to engage students and illustrate personal contracts.
Bilateral Contracts: Mutual promises exchanged (both parties have obligations).
Unilateral Contracts: A promise that requires a specific act to complete it (e.g., a reward for a lost dog).
A contract is valid if it fulfills all legal requirements:
Parties must consent to legal acts.
Must offer consideration that is legally recognized.
Unenforceable Agreements: Cannot be enforced in court due to lack of consideration or legal concerns.
Express Contracts: Terms explicitly stated and agreed upon.
Implied Contracts: Formed through actions rather than written terms.
Promissory Estoppel: Protects a party when they rely on a non-enforceable promise to their detriment.
Example: Planning for prom based on someone’s invitation.
Quasi-Contract: Created to prevent unjust enrichment when one party benefits at another's expense without a formal contract.
Example: A person's house being painted without consent when there was no agreement to do so.
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs commercial transactions across states.
Article Two of the UCC specifically addresses the sale of goods (tangible items you can touch and move).
Distinction between goods and services is critical in contract law.
Goods defined as physical objects, whereas services are actions performed for a benefit.
Non-Competition Agreements: Limited use; legality varies by state.
Contract Characteristics: Valid contracts involve parties with capacity, clear consent, and legal purpose.
Common Law vs. UCC Application: Determine the governing law based on whether goods or services predominate in an agreement.
Understanding contracts involves recognizing definitions, types, elements of enforceability, and the difference between promises that are merely social and those that hold legal weight.