The term 'quasi' means 'resembling', indicating that quasi-experiments mimic true experimental designs but lack certain criteria, particularly manipulation and control.
Quasi-experiments utilize quasi-independent variables, which are non-manipulated variables that differentiate groups (e.g., gender, age).
Unlike true experiments, quasi-experiments do not allow for random assignment, leading to potential biases in group comparisons.
Researchers often fail to specify that their independent variable is quasi-independent, leading to confusion in interpreting results.
The abbreviation 'IV' is used for both independent and quasi-independent variables, which can mislead readers about the nature of the study.
Understanding the design and variables is crucial for readers to discern whether a study is truly experimental or quasi-experimental.
This design compares different groups of participants formed under conditions that do not allow for random assignment.
It is also known as a between-subjects nonexperimental design, focusing on differences between groups (e.g., males vs. females in aggression studies).
The lack of control over group assignment introduces assignment bias, making it difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
This design measures the dependent variable before and after a treatment, allowing researchers to assess changes over time.
All participants typically receive the treatment, which is a non-manipulated variable, making it a within-subjects nonexperimental design.
Validity threats include history, instrumentation, testing effects, maturation, and regression, which can confound results.
A study comparing aggressive behavior in males and females shows higher aggression in males, but causation cannot be established due to the design's limitations.
The results highlight the importance of understanding the context and characteristics of the groups being compared.
A political consultant evaluates a new advertisement's effectiveness by polling voters before and after exposure, but external factors may influence results.
This design illustrates the challenges of attributing changes solely to the treatment without considering other variables.
This design involves multiple measurements taken over time, allowing researchers to assess the impact of a treatment or event.
It minimizes threats to internal validity by providing a clearer picture of changes over time, as seen in studies measuring blood pressure before and after a treatment.
External events can confound results, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of data.
These designs integrate elements of both nonequivalent groups and pretest-posttest designs, allowing for a more comprehensive analysis.
They help eliminate order effect confounds and reduce participant numbers while addressing individual differences.
An example includes a study on memory retrieval influenced by mood, demonstrating the interaction between within-subjects and between-subjects factors.