more preferential preference for people in the ingroup, discrimination against people in the outgroup
minimal groups paradigm experiment
Assign groups to arbitrary groups
Participants showed strong favoritism towards their assigned groups, even when the criteria for group assignment were meaningless.
Outcome: People show ingroup bias easily
Allport Contact Hypothesis
Need:
Equal status
A shared objective/goal
Active collaboration
Needs to have clear support
OUTCOME: Not enough evidence because of publication bias
Jigsaw Classrom Outcomes:
LACK of random assignment, major threat to validity
Not enough evidence that proves it’s more effective than other methods
prejudice on the decline
System 2 - effortful thinking, analytical
system 1 - gut feeling, automatic
argument vs cues, what are they
system 2 is more likely to activate if:
it is relevant to you
if it will happen to you soon/high stakes
Need for Cognition (NFC)
People who score high on this like to be analytical and enjoy hard things
they are also more likely to engage in System 2 thinking, relying on arguments rather than initial cues
opposite is true for people who score lower
Door in the Face Effect
A psychological phenomenon where individuals are more likely to agree to a smaller request after first being presented with a larger, more unreasonable request.
Reciprocity is likely the reason: the person making the smaller request appears to be meeting halfway, making the other person feel obligated to comply.
Cognitive Reflection Task
People who scored higher on CRT are better at distinguishing fake news as not accurate (regardless of what political party they associate with)
People who scored lower on CRT are ass at everything
Aggression was NOT genetically programmed into our DNA
We don’t have a violence gene
we did inherit some violent tendencies from our ancestors, this is shown through our ancestors, related things like chimps and our parts of our brains
However, biology acts like a loaded gun, whether we choose to act on them is largely dependent on ourselves, cultural norms, society etc.
we have a fundamental desire to stand on business and seek revenge when someone does us dirty
Thomas Hobbes
Said that without a strong central authority (government), people are just gonna be stuck in a vicious cycle of violence
CORRECTED version of Seville Statement
it is scientifically CORRECT to say that we have inherited a tendency to make war from our animal ancestors
it is scientifically BULLSHIT to say that war or any other violent behavior is genetically programmed into our human nature.
it is almost CERTAINLY TRUE that in the course of human evolution there has been selection for aggressive behavior
it is scientifically CORRECT to say that humans possess neural systems to regulate aggression
Dictator Game
Motivations for prosocial behavior
egoism
Altruism
Collectivism
Principilism