Date: March 10
Completed discussion on the quotient construction for commutative rings.
Began exploration of groups with the following Proposition:
Let m be any equivalence relation on group G (denoted as 6).
Define the operation: [3][4] = [gh]; this creates a group structure on G/∼.
Important Note:
guh when gh is in [16], this aligns with the construction of the group quotient G/[1].
Only way to define a group structure on equivalence classes is through the group quotient.
Different equivalence relations exist for a given group G.
Let s be a subgroup of G. Define grah iff h is in s, giving a possible group structure.
This structure on G/s exists only if s is a normal subgroup.
If s is normal, it coincides with quotient construction; otherwise, it does not.
Let R be a commutative ring.
Theorem I regarding subgroups:
A subset S of R is an equivalence relation iff S is a subgroup using addition.
Operations on R/S:
+ [y] = [x+y]
* [y] = [x*y]
S must be an ideal for these operations to define a ring structure on R/S.
In ring theory, "ideal" has similar importance as a normal subgroup does in group theory.
Historical context: Mathematicians sought to generalize number theory (e.g., unique factorization in integers) into the realm of rings.
Different examples of rings:
Complex integers: R = a + bi
More complex numbers: K = a + b√2 + c√3, where a, b, c are integers.
Unique factorization doesn’t hold for all rings, prompting the concept of ideals in number theory.
In geometry, curves or surfaces correspond to quotient rings.
Example: Circle identification through the equation x² + y² = 1.
Points on the circle relate to ideals within the ring R.
This reflects the modern treatment of number theory through the lens of rings, ideals, and quotients.
Denoting R/S as the quotient construction provides clarity and understanding of structures across various mathematical fields.
The proof of Theorem I mirrors those seen in vector spaces and group theory.
Assignment reference: Examine what "ideal" means when K' is not commutative.
Example given:
R = Z (integers)
S = nZ is an ideal.
The resultant quotient R/S corresponds to Z/nZ.
Highlights the correct representation of R/S not only as a ring but sometimes as a field, emphasizing equivalence classes: [r] = r + S.
Reminders for calculations: Select good representatives, and remember to "mod by S" to simplify calculations.