It's crucial to consider international relations in practice by using history as a guide to understand theories. This involves testing theories, creating new questions, and considering new paradigms to understand present-day developments and patterns. Examples are used to examine how rival beliefs and ideas conflict and challenge each other, refining our understanding of theory in practice and how states engage.
Different elites utilize these theories, which shape their perception. Think about the influences that shape ideas of leadership, threats, and how to engage with international organizations. Consider concepts like multipolarity, bipolarity, and the balance of power.
Thucydides, a historian of the Peloponnesian Wars, is seminal in international relations (IR) theory for researching the causes of war. He studied the distribution of power from Athens to Sparta, seeking lessons from history.
Examples are used to illustrate how theories are interpreted, focusing on specific cases. The course emphasizes the modern nation-state, as it is the most familiar, though its existence is relatively recent in human history. We will explore its creation, challenges, and impact on IR theory and practice.
James Scott's work, Seeing Like a State, challenges conventional viewpoints.
Consider exploring additional political science courses focusing on comparative politics in different regions or eras.
Considering the Roman Empire helps understand the concept of citizenship, including its privileges and duties, and how the empire was envisioned.
Various empires existed during the Middle Ages, including the Arabic and Islamic Empires, the Byzantine Empire, and empires in China and South Asia. These empires offer lessons in international relations regarding their creation, maintenance, and challenges.
Empires such as the Kingdom of Ghana (5th-13th century) illustrate complex interactions and conceptions of citizenship, with power and authority varying from centralized kingdoms to decentralized structures of governance. These empires demonstrate multiple and overlapping identities, institutions, and hierarchies.
Many empires did not adhere to the Weberian state model with permanent and precisely delineated boundaries. Instead, they featured overlapping authority, community ownership, and allegiance to multiple centers of power.
The age of colonization and the Transatlantic slave trade must be considered in any revisiting of international relations history. This period involved the horrific sale of over 17 million Africans between the 8th and 20th centuries, impacting Sub-Saharan Africa's population share, which fell from 17% to 7% of the world's population.
Latin America's civilizations, empires, and colonial experiences are crucial to consider.
Medieval Japan, with its intricate political structures, including the rise of the samurai and the values of service and loyalty, offers important insights.
Charles Tilly argues that war drove the creation of nation-states. Monarchs sought money for arms to expand power, using taxes to build armies and consolidate power internally and externally. Tilly succinctly states, "War made the state, and the state made war."
War making spurred the development of state apparatus to extract taxes from society and finance war efforts. This led to a decrease in the number of independent states between the 1500s and 1800s.
The Reformation, precipitated by events like the Black Death, challenged the established international order by questioning the centrality of the Catholic Church.
The Thirty Years' War holds central significance in international relations theory, particularly the Peace of Westphalia (1648). This peace is considered the start of the modern nation-state concept and international relations as we know it.
The Peace of Westphalia shaped modern relations by:
Granting each prince control over their own religion.
Establishing territorial rulers' control over their realms.
Promoting secular national authority superior to religious edicts.
Secularizing international politics.
Promoting sovereignty as a legal doctrine.
Establishing permanent national militaries.
Creating an international society based on the legal equality of states.
Each state possesses the same rights and duties, including managing matters within their own boundaries and acting without interference from other states. Recognition by other states is essential for statehood. State making is intimately tied to war making.
Exploring data series such as Our World in Data can illustrate global deaths in conflict, providing insights into different eras and the effects of international relations on people's lives.
For example the share of world population of sub-Saharan African has fallen from 17\% to 7\% between eighth and the twentieth century. Also Tilly succinctly writes that in \text{War made the state and the state made war}.