How do tax cuts or government transfers affect consumption, the real interest rate, and investment?
Do fiscal deficits resulting from tax cuts or increased transfers increase interest rates and crowd out investment?
Tax cuts create fiscal deficits.
The government borrows to cover the deficit.
Increased government borrowing raises interest rates.
This negatively impacts investment.
Consumption rises as tax cuts increase disposable income.
Tax cuts lead to higher public debt, necessitating future tax increases to repay the debt and interest.
Households anticipate future tax increases and save the tax cut to cover them.
Consumption remains unchanged.
Interest rates do not rise.
Investment is unaffected.
This is known as Ricardian equivalence.
Which view is correct?
The economy consists of two periods.
The Government
Firms
Households
This lecture introduces the government into the model.
T_1 = taxes in period 1 (in real terms)
T_2 = taxes in period 2 (in real terms)
The government determines T1 and T2 . Initially, taxes are lump sum, meaning they do not depend on income or spending.
G_1 = government spending in goods in period 1 (in real terms)
G_2 = government spending in goods in period 2 (in real terms)
G1 and G2 are typically exogenously given.
B_t denotes real government debt (bonds) issued in period t and maturing in period t+1.
r_t is the real interest rate on this debt.
Primary Fiscal Deficit = Gt - Tt
Secondary Fiscal Deficit = G_{t}-T_{t}+r_{t-1}B_{t-1}
Government Saving = S_{t}^{g^{}}=T_{t}-G_{t}-r_{t-1}B_{t-1}
The government finances its fiscal deficit by issuing debt, represented as B_1-B_0 .
The budget constraint in period 1 is: B_1-B_0=G_1+r_0B_0-T_1
Assume the government starts with no debt, so B_0 = 0.
The budget constraint simplifies to: B_1=G_1-T_1 (1)
When B_0 = 0, the secondary fiscal deficit equals the primary fiscal deficit in period 1.
The government budget constraint in period 2 mirrors that of period 1, with time subscripts advanced by one period: B_2-B_1=G_2+r_1B_1-T_2
The government cannot issue debt in period 2, thus B_2 = 0.
Rearranging, the budget constraint becomes: T_2-G_2=\left(1+r_1\right)B_1 (2)
This equation states that the primary fiscal surplus in period 2, T_T_2-G_2, must cover the public debt, B_1 , plus interest,r_1B_1 .
Combining the period-1 and period-2 government budget constraints to eliminate B_1, gives the inter-temporal budget constraint: G1+\frac{G2}{1+r1}=T1+\frac{T2}{1+r_1} (3)
This constraint implies that the present discounted value of government expenditures must equal the present discounted value of tax revenues for fiscal solvency.
Fiscal solvency doesn't depend on whether G_1 is larger or small than T1 or whether G_2 is smaller or larger than T_2 as long as the stream of government purchases equals the stream of taxes in present value.
Assume a tax cut in period 1: \Delta T_1 < 0
Assume government spending remains constant: \delta G_1=\delta G_2=0
According to the intertemporal budget constraint (3), the government must raise taxes in period 2 by: \delta T_2=-\left(1+r\right)\delta T_1>0
This implies that a tax cut today, with constant government spending, requires borrowing, which must be repaid with interest in period 2, necessitating a tax increase then.