Cohabitation or ‘living together’ has become increasingly the norm in contemporary Western Society
In the past marriage offered financial and emotional stability
today women have more autonomy
Cohabitation reflects the more informal nature of modern living, which doesn’t seem to need to formalise relationships
With the taboo of premarital sex largely removed, living together for a short period of time or a lifetime has become a common part of modern life
casual cohabitation
The least formal cohabitation relationship
A lack of long term commitment
May begin with a casual sexual relationship and then develop
Partners usually share a common sexual and social life
trial marriage cohabitation
Living together before marriage as a ‘trial’
It is argued that before taking such a serious step such as marriage that both partners should be sure that they are compatible.
Short term arrangement
Preparation for the next step = marriage
substitute marriage n ideological cohabitation
Those who never marry but opt for a long-term relationship without marriage. There are two types:
Those who are excluded from marriage – one partner may not be allowed to be remarried.
Ideological reasons – choosing not to marry for many reasons such as disagreeing with the whole institution
Christian responses:
The official position of all mainstream churches is that marriage is the most stable and satisfactory basis for family and sexual life - cohabitation is unacceptable!
Trial marriage is more acceptable to LIBERAL Christians due to the process
argued that marriage isn't just one event but a process starting with engagement, sexual relationship, marriage ceremony then children
The Archbishop of York, John Sentamu publicly supported Prince William and Kate Middleton's cohabitation as a sensible means of testing their desire to marry