Step 2: Calculate the differences from the mean for each participant (Sarah: 7-5=2, Sun Mee: 6-5=1, Josh: 2-5=-3, Rodney: 5-5=0).
Step 3: Square the differences: (Sarah: 2^2=4, Sun Mee: 1^2=1, Josh: (-3)^2=9, Rodney: 0^2=0).
Step 4: Sum the squared differences: 4 + 1 + 9 + 0 = 14
Step 5: Divide by the number of participants minus 1: \frac{14}{(4-1)} = \frac{14}{3} = 4.67
Step 6: Take the square root: \sqrt{4.67} \approx 2.16
Interpretation: Small standard deviation means less variability; large means scores are far from the mean.
Reason for Subtracting 1: Accounts for using the sample mean to calculate variability.
Inferential Statistics
Purpose: To draw conclusions about observed differences or correlations and assess whether results are likely due to chance.
Definition: Mathematical methods to determine if data support a research hypothesis.
Example Study:
Research Question: Relationship between expressions of positive emotion and interpersonal success.
Method: Videotaping job candidate interviews and coding for Duchenne smiling.
Results: Mean smiles for not called back = 3.5, mean smiles for called back = 6.5.
Question: Is the difference of 3 smiles significant or due to chance?
Critical Evaluation of Psychological Research
Media Limitations:
Journalists and media personnel lack training in psychological research.
They may struggle to evaluate information and focus on sensational findings.
Media reports often lack detail and qualifications.
Overgeneralization:
Media reports often omit details about the sample.
Sample characteristics (number of participants, gender, ethnicity) are crucial for interpretation.
Example: Original "fight or flight" research only included men.
Group vs. Individual:
Group statistics may not apply to every individual.
Consumers may misinterpret their experience if it doesn't match group averages.
Example: Developmental milestones do not characterize all children equally.
Albert Einstein did not start talking until he was 3 years old.
Single Study Limitations:
No single study provides definitive answers.
Conflicting results are common in psychological research.
Answers emerge from multiple studies with similar conclusions.
Causation vs. Correlation:
Avoid drawing causal conclusions from correlational studies.
Correlation does not imply causation.
Sources of Psychological Information
Academic Journals:
Findings are submitted for peer review.
Peer review ensures higher scrutiny compared to popular media.
Media Reliability:
Respected newspapers (e.g., The New York Times, The Washington Post) and magazines (e.g., Time, The Atlantic) are more trustworthy.
Tabloids (e.g., National Enquirer) and unverified online sources are less reliable.
The Scientific Method and Health and Wellness
Expressive Writing:
James Pennebaker's research shows that writing about traumatic life events leads to health and well-being benefits.
Initial correlational study compared survivors of spousal suicide and accidental death.
Survivors of spousal suicide were more likely to get sick because they were less likely to talk about their loss.
Experimental Studies:
Participants were randomly assigned to write about either their most traumatic event (experimental) or an uninteresting topic (control).
Wrote for 20 minutes on three or four consecutive days.
Results: The trauma writing group had better physical health.
Ethical Principles in Research
Balancing Act: Ethical principles seek to balance the pursuit of knowledge, and the well-being, rights, and dignity of participants.
Key Issues Addressed by APA Guidelines:
Informed consent
Confidentiality
Debriefing
Deception
Informed Consent:
Participants must know what their participation will involve.
Example: In a dating study, participants should be informed that a questionnaire might stimulate thoughts about their relationships that they have not considered.
Participants can withdraw at any time.
Confidentiality:
Researchers must keep individual data confidential and anonymous when possible.
Confidential data can be linked to participants' identities; anonymous data cannot.
Debriefing:
Researchers inform participants of the study's purpose and methods after completion.
Preliminary information can be given beforehand but should not affect behavior.
Deception:
Used when revealing the study's purpose would alter behavior.
Example: Risk-taking and trust study where participants interacted with a confederate.
Deception must not harm participants, and debriefing is essential.
Researchers can never deceive participants about actual harms that may occur in a study.
Informed consent is violated in deception studies, so participants should have the option of withdrawing consent after debriefing.
Federal Oversight:
The Office for Human Research Protections ensures participant well-being.
Addresses ethical issues in research on vulnerable populations.
Ethical Treatment of Research Animals
Animal Research:
Used to understand and solve human problems.
Animal studies have produced important benefits to human life.
Ethical Considerations:
Using nonhuman animals poses an ethical dilemma since they cannot provide consent.
APA members using animals account for about 5 percent of all psychological research.
90 percent of animal research involves rats and mice.
Guidelines:
Researchers follow standards for housing, feeding, and maintaining well-being.
They weigh potential benefits against possible harm and avoid unnecessary pain.