Lecture by Dr. Jesse Richman at Old Dominion University
Focused on the constitutions that shaped Congress
Functions of Legislatures: Resolve conflicts and make collective decisions.
Role of Constitutions: Structure the rules governing political processes.
Questions include:
How are conflicts resolved?
Who participates in the resolutions?
Inequalities in Representation: Considerations like the inclusion of women or age restrictions may affect participation in decision-making.
Two Focus Areas:
Congress under the Articles of Confederation.
Congress under the current Constitution.
Definition: A situation where a group wishes to act together but can't agree on a solution.
Examples:
Choosing a lunch venue.
Deciding which side of the road to drive on.
Context: Location of the national capital debated during the Articles of Confederation.
Southern States: Preference for Georgetown.
Central States: Preference for Philadelphia.
Characteristic: Collective agreements may fall apart due to competition from alternative offers.
Minimum Winning Coalitions: More susceptible to being raided, i.e., members replaced based on better offers.
Structure: Three individuals vote on how to split one dollar; majority support needed to pass a proposal.
Goal: Each participant aims to maximize their share.
Outcome: Always potential proposals incentivizing two players at the cost of a third.
Simulation Access: Participants can engage through provided online platform (requires ODU midas login).
Initial Distribution of Dollar:
District A: 20%
District B: 40%
District C: 40%
Action: Players propose new distributions to total 100%.
Allocation Process (Sample Paths): New distributions explored as players propose changes over iterations.
Sample Allocations:
Allocation #2: 50% District A, 50% District B, 0% District C.
Allocation #3: 90% District A, 0% District B, 10% District C.
Explanation: Select agents (representatives, committee leaders) to act on behalf of constituents; agents may have misaligned incentives.
Example: A car mechanic finding unnecessary repairs.
Implications: Chamber leaders are chosen to organize effectively but may pursue conflicting goals.
Articles of Confederation: Unified but weak institutions.
US Constitution: Separated powers among institutions to check one another.
Historical Context: Transition from Articles of Confederation to modern state legislatures.
Key Points: Transformation from colonial assemblies to more organized legislatures.
Evolutionary lines from colonial assemblies to modern Congress.
Major Issues:
Inability to resolve national issues due to lack of power.
Limitations on enforcement, taxation, and internal legislative decision-making.
Weak committee structures and chaotic internal rules.
Voting Rules: Any member may propose location changes.
Amendment Process:
First vote on striking current language, then vote on new language to adopt.
Major legislation required a 3/4 majority of total members, complicating resolutions.
Impact: Provided Congress with more power and independence.
Key Provisions:
Designed to balance strength with a system of checks and balances.
Expressed Powers: Define key authorities of Congress.
Power of the Purse: Control over federal budget.
Commerce Clause: Regulate interstate commerce.
Necessary and Proper Clause: Grant flexibility in law-making authority.
Perspective: While branches are coequal, Congress defines structure and duties of the others.
Powers:
Override vetoes, structure the judiciary, and impeachment authority.
Plans Discussed:
Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan.
Connecticut Compromise: A bicameral legislature structure.
House apportioned by population; Senate equality among states.
Simulation Context: States negotiate policy making under varying population influences for House and Senate.
Issues Faced: Federal assumption of state debts and tariff levels.
Considerations: Different outcomes in House and Senate require compromises.
Logrolling: Exchange of favoring votes to secure legislation approval.
Bicameralism Impact:
Protecting the status quo when houses disagree leading to gridlock.
Compromise required when agreement on direction of policy change exists but not on magnitude.
Objective: Create a minimum wage policy that aligns with team interests.
Process: Engage in legislator decision-making influenced by presidential veto threats.
Factors Influencing Presidential Power:
Bargaining strategies and the nature of disagreements with Congress.
Example: Veto patterns of President Bush.
Supermajority Requirement: 2/3 of Congress to override a veto.
Veto in One Dimension: Protecting status quo vs. forcing compromise.
Examples:
Amendments, cloture in the Senate, treaty ratifications, and rule suspensions in the House.
Shift from treaties to executive agreements to avoid supermajority challenges.
Trends: Increasing use of executive agreements by presidents to bypass Senate ratification challenges.
Data Representation: Show decrease in treaties over time relative to executive agreements, illustrating changing presidential strategies in foreign relations.
Judicial Review: Established in Marbury v. Madison, allowing court to invalidate laws.
Impact on Legislation: Legislative interpretations can be clarified or overturned through new laws.
Kaiser's Insights:
Disparities between constitutional ideals and practical governance.
Congressional behavior impacted by public perception and individual action.
Constitutional Implications:
Determines conditions for legislative action, empowers and restricts Congress, and facilitates historical developments.
Next Focus: Internal organization changes in Congress; legislatures determining rules and individual member powers.