Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
What is it?
System of orgs, institutions, processes that work together to affect entrepreneurial activity
Policy, Finance, Culture, Supports, Human Capital, Markets
Understand how it develops
Short period? Does it take a long time?
Generally takes a long time to develop
Be able to apply the framework to regions
Silicon Valley
Human capital: proximity to universities, talent pool
Finance: venture capitals everywhere
Culture: risk taking DNA
Markets: multiple to sell to, multicultural
Policy: business friendly
Supports: incubators
Weakness
High cost of living and competition
High risk of failure
No work life balance
Austin
Human capital: skilled workforce, universities
Finance: less traditional VC’s but a lot of early stage angel groups/incubators
Culture: outside the box, hippies, entrepreneurial DNA
Markets: diverse/multicultural people, early adopters
Policy: business friendly
Supports: incubators
What did we learn about syracuse’s ecosystem
Human capital: universities, most leave after graduation
Finance: limited
Supports: some accelerators
Local investments going on: micron computer chip production should give about 50k jobs
Pros: strong universities with human capital, lot of early stage supports, some areas of promise
Cons: difficulty retaining young talent, other domains still require work to develop a thriving ecosystem
Effectual/Causal Thinking and Personalities
Causal | Effectual | |
Overview | Striving towards a known goal | Allowing goals to emerge |
View of future | Can be predicted | Can be influences |
Objective | prediction | Control, design, influence |
Starting point | Given goals | who/what i know, given means |
Basis for action | Should- based on optimal scenarios | Can- based on what is doable, resources @ hand |
Attitude towards risk | Expected return | Affordable loss |
Attitude towards others | competitive | co-creational |
Attitude towards surprises | Avoid them | Be open, can trigger new paths |
Personality
Common traits
Conscientious, open to experience, low neuroticism, extravert, risk seeking
Roles
Only explains a small effect of variance in the success of new ventures
Founding team dynamics, business model, and industry connections explain it more
5 characteristics of a strong opportunity
Durable
Opportunity is located in a market, industry, or trend that will continue to grow over a long period of time
Profit potential
Creates value for customers
They’re willing to pay a premium
Financing is available
Investors should find it attractive
Fit between founders background/skills
Customer discover and research
Why is it important
Understand your customers, their problems
Form assumptions you can better test
Improve chances of product market fit
Type of data avail
Market size
TAM, SAM, SOM
Total Addressable Market (TAM): total size of the market for a product if 100% market share achieved
$376B in total EV sales worldwide in 2023
Serviceable Available Market (SAM): portion of TAM that is served by your companies product
$88-221B in potential Tesla EV sales in 2023
Service Obtainable Market (SOM): portion of SAM that your company can realistically acquire
$82B in Tesla EV sales in 2023
Segmentation
Innovators
Tech enthusiasts
Early Adopters
Visionaries
Early majority
Pragmatists
Late majority
Conservatives
Laggards
Skeptics
Lean Startup
What is it?
Hypothesis driven approach to develop and validate a business model
Steps:
Establish a vision
Develop and test hypotheses
Learn from those tests, incorporate feedback into updating the business model
How is it different from previous approaches?
Experimentation vs elaborate planning
Decompose business model into smaller elements that can be tested
Customer learning vs intuition
Obtain customer feedback to guide business model
Iterative process vs upfront investment
Avoid large resource commitments by developing products incrementally
What are some benefits
Changing your product in small increments
Engaging w customers
How can you apply it
Set vision
Develop hypothesis
Specify mvp tests
Run tests
Hypothesis validated or rejected
Persevere, pivot, or perish
Testing
MVP
Minimum viable product
Product with just enough features to get feedback from customers
I.e. simple webpage, explainer video
Can support or reject assumptions of an early business model
A and B
Divide customers into two similar groups
One group (control) receives current product features
Second group (treatment) receives the new product feature
How to test
Test with a small group of customers first
Use a series of MVP tests
Business model canvas
What is a business model
Description of how a firm creates, delivers, and captures value
Understand each block and what they mean, examples of each
Customer Segments
Who are your customers
What do they do
What obstacles do they experience
Customer Relationship
How do you acquire, keep, and grow customers
Channels
How do you reach your customers
Revenue Streams
How do you make money
Value Proposition
What is your product
How does it address customers problems
How is it unique
Key Activities
What actions/processes does the value proposition require
Key Resources
What assets does the value proposition acquire
Human capital, tech, customer data, infrastructure
Cost Structure
What are the most important costs to our business model
Key Partners
Who are the external partners what make our business model work
How can you understand business models using the canvas
Allows you to list assumptions important to your business which you can then test
Describes how a firm creates, captures, and delivers value
Founding Teams
Characteristics
Diverse industry experience
Diverse prior company affiliations
Broad functional experience
Prior management experience
How are they formed
Sole founder initiated the idea, then searches for co-founders
Idea usually comes first
Group decides to start a business, then develop an idea
Group first, then idea
Interpersonal attraction, resource seeking, hybrid approach
What types of teams are generally more successful than other teams
Diverse teams with multiple skill sets
Common challenges
Changing roles, generalists vs specialist
Splitting equity
Who brings the idea
Who brings the capital
Opportunity cost
Future commitment
Funding
Sources, preferences, motivations, when they are appropriate
Can you explain the logic of why a particular investor is appropriate for a company at a certain stage
Know the terms
Dilution
Ownership decreases with each funding round
Preferred vs common stock
Preferred: given to investors
Provides them with certain privileges
Common: given to founders and employees
Debt vs equity funding
Debt: loan decisions based on historical cash flows
Returns are bounded for investor
Equity: investors provide capital in exchange for ownership
Greater upside for investors
Causes dilution
Funding rounds
Seed round, series A round, B round, etc
seed/early stage
FFF, bootstrapping
Pros
Easy to access and convince
Less tough negotiations
Cons
Have less to invest
You may end up with many small investors
Crowdfunding
Raise money online
Easy to make
Funds a wide range of projects
Small
Incubators
Typically no investment
office space, networking
Accelerators
Office space, networking
Invest small amounts
Set timeline
angels/angel groups
Pros
Larger
Contribute experience and contacts
More patient in timing of returns
Cons
Less committed
May not have enough money for future rounds
May lack expertise
Professional investors
VC
Professional investors who invest in startups for equity on behalf of limited partners
Financial motivations
Pros
More funding
Introductions to customers, partners
Strategic advice
Cons
Time pressure
Less favorable deal terms
CVC
Units in large corporations that invest in startups
Financial and strategic motivations
Pros
Startup earns credibility
Access corporate resources
Cons
May limit future strategic options
Risk of larger firm misusing startups intellectual property
Who, motivations, qualities preferred by investors
Cases to date
RTR
Lots of experimentation
Resolve their concept w the designers
Customer testing
Lean startup
Ockham
Way in which the team was founded bc they were specialists
Equity split became an issue - co-ceo thing
Ken got less equity, they would dilute his share
Building a team, founding team, roles, equity
Milkmade
How they ran the kickstarter
Economics of crowdfunding, what do the campaigns look like
Learned from other cases
Funding, crowdfunding, what does it look like, nature and reality
Main points of each case, important topics we discussed in class
Key issues? How were they resolved