Slide 1 │ Copyright notice
Standard Part VB notice (Copyright Act 1968) reminding students the material is for USYD coursework only; further copying without permission may breach the Act.
Slide 2 │ Title & presenter
Unit: EXSS3062 Motor Control & Learning ― Motor Learning (ML 7).
Topic: “Key instructional principles in skill acquisition: Observational Learning”.
Presenter: Dr Shaun Abbott, Discipline of Exercise & Sport Science, USYD.
Slide 3 │ Acknowledgement of Country
Recognises Traditional Owners of Australia and their continuing connection to land, water, culture.
Presenter on Gadigal land (Eora Nation); pays respect to Elders past, present, emerging; extends respect to custodians of any land students occupy.
Slide 4 │ Unit & Lecture Learning Outcomes
Unit LO (LO3‑LO6)
Evaluate theoretical models explaining motor control & learning.
Explain how individual constraints/pre‑existing function shape pedagogy.
Apply motor‑learning strategies to maximise performance & clinical outcomes.
Design, implement & evaluate practice environments/programs for skill development.
Lecture‑specific LO
Describe how different types of observational learning affect novices.
Identify components of two explanatory theories (Dynamic View of Modelling, Social Learning Theory).
Decide when & how to deploy demonstrations for a newly learned skill.
Slide 5 │ Recommended Reading
Renshaw et al. 2019 – Constraints‑Led Approach (coaching principles).
Davids et al. 2008 – Dynamics of Skill Acquisition (ecological/dynamical perspective).
Magill & Anderson 2021 – Ch 14 “Demonstration & Instruction”.
Hodges & Williams 2019 – Ch 8 “Observational Learning”.
(All PDFs on Canvas reading list.)
Slide 6 │ Definition & Rationale
Observational learning = watching another’s behaviour and adapting one’s own as a direct result.
Also called modelling (e.g., novice observing expert).
Demonstrations are a high‑bandwidth visual channel—faster than verbal cues alone (“A picture is worth a thousand words”).
Slide 7 │ Related Concepts
Imitation: copy the exact form.
Emulation: reproduce the goal/outcome, method may differ.
Eckokinesis: spontaneous mirroring.
Observational learning integrates imitation & emulation but is applied specifically to skill acquisition.
Slide 8 │ Movement‑Recognition Task
Three point‑light GIFs shown; students asked (via QR code) to identify each movement skill.
Purpose: prime visual attunement to kinematic invariants before theory section.
Slide 9 │ Point‑Light Technique (Johansson 1973)
Isolating joint centres with lights: static frames reveal little; motion lets observers detect sex, identity, team role.
Demonstrates how relative movement patterns convey rich information; attempts to consciously reproduce these patterns can constrain emergent coordination if over‑controlled.
Slide 10 │ Mirror Neuron System
Discovered ~1992 in macaques; same neurons fire when seeing an action and doing it.
Combines actual vision with motor imagery → creates an internal simulation linking perception and execution (“Monkey see, monkey do”).
Provides neurophysiological basis for why demonstrations accelerate skill acquisition.
Slide 11 │ Effect on Skill‑Production Measures
Slide presents empirical graph (axis labels not textually captured) showing:
Demonstration group gains faster accuracy/consistency vs no‑demo control on early practice trials.
Take‑home: viewing before doing organises learners’ initial attempts, reducing trial‑and‑error.
Slide 12 │ Theory 1 – Dynamic View of Modelling (Scully & Newell 1985)
Focuses on information pick‑up (visual perception).
Three perceivable motion types:
Absolute (single‑segment path/velocity).
Common (multiple segments move together).
Relative (timing/phase relationships).
Learners extract invariant relative motion and self‑organise coordination accordingly.
Slide 13 │ Theory 2 – Bandura’s Social Learning Theory (1986)
Attention – selective focus on model’s key cues.
Retention – encode & rehearse representation (labelling, imagery).
Reproduction – translate representation into physical movement (requires capability & feedback).
Motivation – external or intrinsic incentives drive execution & persistence.
Emphasises cognitive mediation (memory codes) rather than direct perception.
Slide 14 │ Why Demonstration Impact Varies
Effectiveness depends on:
Task constraints (complexity, coordination novelty).
Learner constraints (age, perceptual capacity, prior experience).
New or unstable coordination patterns benefit most from demonstrations; simple well‑learned skills benefit less.
Slide 15 │ Three Demonstration Formats
Beginner⇢Expert: classic coach‑to‑athlete or therapist‑to‑patient model.
Beginner⇢Beginner: peers view each other; lowers threshold, promotes exploration.
Self‑Modelling: learner views edited best clips of their own execution to reinforce correct pattern and confidence.
Slide 16 │ Beginners Observing Beginners
Even unskilled demos yield gains (though expert models still preferable).
Observer uses checklist while partner performs → provides peer feedback.
Discourages blind mimicry of “perfect” form; encourages problem‑solving & active error detection.
Slide 17 │ Self‑Modelling Protocol
Record learner’s attempts → edit out all errors → compile only exemplar segments.
Dowrick 1999: learners should not view their mistakes; reinforces positive representation, avoids imprinting faulty coordination.
Slide 18 │ Timing & Frequency – Stage‑Dependent
Cognitive→Associative: demonstrations assemble novel topology (gross coordination).
Associative→Autonomous: learner refines control parameters (speed, amplitude); demo utility diminishes with years of practice.
Slide 19 │ Timing & Frequency – Practical Rules
Provide a demo before first practice block, then as needed during.
Serial viewing (several demos in a row) > interspersed for retention (Weeks et al., 2000).
Gradually fade frequency as proficiency grows.
Coach must gauge:
Fidelity of demo to intended action.
Information quantity (avoid overload).
Learner’s capacity to use that information.
Slide 20 │ One‑Page Summary Table (Coach’s Quick Guide)
Condenses slides 14‑19 into an “at‑a‑glance”:
Choose model (expert, peer, self) based on task & learner.
Schedule demos early & serially; taper with practice.
Direct attention to invariant features (relative motion).
Couple demos with immediate practice to exploit mirror‑neuron priming.
Integrate with other cues (verbal, kinesthetic) but avoid conflicting