The application of science to law is termed forensic science.
Sherlock Holmes: Inspired a generation of forensic scientists and criminal investigators.
Alphonse Bertillion: First devised a system of personal identification using body measurements.
Henry Galton: Developed the first statistical study proving the uniqueness of fingerprints.
Dr. Leone Lattes: Created the first workable procedure for typing dried bloodstains.
Calvin Goddard: Developed the comparison microscope, essential for firearms examination.
Albert S. Osborn: Associated with early scientific principles in document examination.
Hans Gross: Advocated the application of science to criminal investigations.
Edmond Locard: Established the principle of transfer of evidence; directed one of the first functional crime labs in Lyons, France.
First U.S. Forensic Laboratory: Established in 1923 by the Los Angeles Police Department.
California: Example of a state with integrated regional and satellite laboratories.
British Crime Laboratory System: National system of regional laboratories, unlike the U.S. decentralized system.
The increasing demand for drug analyses is a critical factor in the expansion of crime lab services in the U.S.
Important federal agencies providing forensic services include:
FBI
Drug Enforcement Administration
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
U.S. Postal Inspection Service
The U.S. has a decentralized crime laboratory system across various levels of government (federal, state, county, municipal).
Physical Science Unit: Application of chemistry, physics, and geology to evidence identification and comparison.
Biology Unit: Examination of blood, hairs, fibers, and botanical materials.
Firearms Unit: Examines bullets, cartridge cases, shotgun shells, and ammunition.
Toxicology Unit: Studies body fluids and organs for drugs and poisons.
Crime-Scene Investigation Unit: Sends trained personnel to crime scenes to collect evidence.
Frye v. United States: Established the "general acceptance" principle for scientific evidence admissibility in court.
Daubert v. Merrell: Supreme Court ruled that trial judges do not solely rely on "general acceptance" for admissibility of scientific tests.
Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael: Expanded trial judge discretion beyond scientific testimony.
Coppolino v. State: A Florida case highlighting the trial judge's flexibility in scientific inquiry.
An expert witness possesses specialized skills or knowledge to assist the court.
The demeanor of an expert witness can significantly impact the weight given to their testimony.
Expert witness testimony may include personal opinions based on studies or examinations.
The ability of investigators to collect and recognize crime-scene evidence effectively is reliant on the training received from crime laboratories.