Date: 2/17/25
Topic: Nonscientific Approaches and Pseudosciences
Definition: Fields that appear scientific but do not adhere to the scientific method.
Examples: Astrology, graphology.
Issues with Personal Experiences:
Cannot validate information about human intuition and behavior.
Importance of differentiating between someone with authority and someone with expertise in a subject matter.
Authority may not always provide reliable information, whereas expertise is grounded in knowledge and research.
Good hypotheses should lead to results that relate to and support a theory.
Types of Outcomes When Testing Theories:
Evidence Insufficiency: Results may not provide enough evidence to support a theory.
Response: Design follow-up studies and collect more evidence for research.
Inadequate Explanations: Results may lead to rejecting the theory when it fails to explain the phenomenon adequately.
Adjustment: The theory may need modification to incorporate new results.
Theories evolve based on new findings and research outcomes.
Sources of Research Ideas:
Observations: Noticing phenomena that occur in the world.
Serendipity: Accidental discoveries, e.g., bystander intervention effect and parlor conditioning with dogs.
Previous Research: Consult textbooks available in libraries for foundational knowledge.
Described as a "program of research" where researchers discuss current theories.
Importance of articles and teams of researchers investigating various psychological phenomena.