Classical Conditionaing
Unconditioned Stimulus → naturally triggers response
Unconditional Response → triggers naturally by stimulus
Conditioned Stimulus → does not naturally trigger the response but changed to trigger it
Conditioned Response→ triggered by the conditioned stimulus
Types of Classical Conditioning →
Aversive
Pavlov’s Dog Experiment
Acquistion → initial paring of the conditioned stimulus
Extinction → the breakdown of the conditioned stimulus and the conditioned response
Spontaneous Recovery → random reappearence of the conditioned stimulus after extinction
Generalization → similar stimuli cause the same response
Discrimination → a similar stimuli does not cause the same response
First-Order Conditioning → original classical conditioning, what is additionally used to cause a response
Food → Drool + Bell = Bell → Drool
Second-Order Conditioning → Using the conditioned stimuli to condition a new stimuli
Bell → Drool + Light = Light → Drool
John B. Watson → Founder of “Behaviorism”
an approach to psychology that will dominate throughout the later half 20th century
Conditioning and behavior modification and still widley used in therapy and behavioral training to help clients change problematic behaviors and develop new skills
Baby Albert Study → 1920
can you classicly condition emotions? Fear
Set-up
first exposed Albert to stimuli
white lab rat, rabbit, monkey, dog, fur coat, etc.
not fearful of any stimuli
everytime the white rat comes near Albert, they are going to take a big steel rod and smack it with a hammer evertime the rat comes near to cause fear
when they brought the other stimuli in front of him, he had the same fear reaction
Baby Albert Update →
died at age 6
Aversive Conditioning → special type of classical conditioning
Taste Aversion → why you don’t like certain foods
Alcoholism →
therapist offers client appealing drinks laced with a drug that produces severe nausea
undesired behavior + unpleasent stimulus = stop with the undesired behavior
form of therapy
Goal = replace positive response to a harmful stimulus with a negative response
association between unwanted behavior and unpleasant feelings
Weins & Menustik (1983) →
meta analysis of aversive conditioning
studied 685 alcoholics who had undergone aversion therapy
1 year later, 63% were successful
After 3 years, only 33% remained abstinent
Does it work? → in short term, maybe
problem = people know that outside therapist’s office, they can drink without fear of nausea
person’s ability to discriminate between aversive conditioning situation and all others limits effectiveness
Operate Conditioning → Behavior traning protocol for voulentary behaviors
Negative Punishment → removing something to discourage a bahavior
Positive Punishment → adding something to discourage a behavior
Positive Reinforcment → adding something to encourage a behavior
Negative Reinforcment → removing something to encourage a behavior
B.F. Skinner → Skinner Boxes
studied operant conditioning using isolated behaviors
uses pigeons and rats
Discovered reinforcers and punishments
Behavior Shaping → reward steps towards the goal
Behavior Chaining → putting a bahavior together with other behaviors to reach the desired goal
Schedules of Reinforcement →
Continuous Reinforcement → response is reinforced every time it occurs
extremley rare in real life
extinction happens quickly → overjustification
start to do an action simply for the reward
Partial Reinforcement → responses sometimes rewarded, sometimes not
greater resistance to extinction
Ratio → # of instances (occurances)
Fixed → behavior is reinforced after a given number of responses
Variable → behavior is reinforced after an unpredictable number of responses
fly fishing
Interval → amount of time
Fixed → behavior is reinforced after a fixed period of time
pay checks
higher response at the end of the interval
Variable → behavior is reinforced after a varying amount of time
fishing
Observational Learning →
Albert Bandura’s Bobo Doll Study →
Set-up → does watching someone perform violent acts provide you with catharsis (process of releasing and therby providing releif from strong emotions)
1961
36 boys and 36 girls approximately 3-6 years old
Stanford University
organized kids into 3 groups:
Experimental group #1 → children watched adults play with toys normally
Experimental group #2 → children watched adults play with toys violently
Control group → children were sent to play with no modeling
Does the child’s gender impact the way that they played in the room?
no
Results →
increased attraction to guns when exposed to an agressive model
guns were never modeled
“novel hostile language” → kids were talking smack while beating the doll
“creative embellishment” → new ways that the children devised to hit the doll
“weapon of assult”
After →
recorded the agressive model and showed it on a TV
also recorded one version but with the person dressed up as a cat
findings were dynamite as the children still imitated the violent behavior seen on TV
Legacy →
Social Learning Theory: a theory of learning and social behavior which propses that new hehaviors can be acquired by observinng and imitating others
Ham Example
Latent learning → learning without knowing you learning
becomes obvious only once a reinforcement is given for demonstration
Edward Tolman
three groups of rats placed into maze
one group always got a reward for completing the maze → faster
one group never got a reward → slower
one group was not rewarded during the first half of the trial but was rewarded the second half → first half they preformed like group two but in the second half they preformed like group one
Building a Cognitive Map
Wolfgang Kohler → pychologist that suspended a banana from the ceiling out of reach from the chimpansees