IFRS – Investments in Associates (IAS 28) – Comprehensive Study Notes
Equity Method Overview
- Associates & joint ventures accounted for using equity method per IAS 28.
- Initial recognition: at cost (purchase consideration + directly attributable transaction costs).
- Subsequent carrying amount =
- Add: investor’s share of the associate’s net income ("equity income").
- Deduct: investor’s share of the associate’s net loss.
- Deduct: dividends declared/received from associate.
- Equity method nick-named “one-line consolidation” because entire interest is presented in a single Investment in Associate line item on SFP.
Equity Income Calculation – Detailed Components
- Base share: \text{Associate\, net\, income} \times \text{Ownership\, \%}.
- Adjust for acquisition FV differentials (amortization):
- If FV > BV for a depreciable/amortizable asset → subtract extra depreciation to arrive at adjusted equity income.
- If FV < BV → add difference’s amortization.
- Realized intercompany profits/gains from prior periods: reverse previous eliminations (add back profits, subtract losses) once realized.
- Unrealized intercompany profits/gains in current period inventory: eliminate portion still in inventory (see formula below).
Unrealized Intercompany Profits Elimination
- Required whenever investor & associate trade with one another.
- Eliminate at period-end: \text{Sales in ending inventory}\times\text{Gross profit \%}\times\text{Investor ownership \%}.
- Result reduces equity income (if unrealized profit) or increases (if unrealized loss).
ASPE Differences (Section 3051)
- When significant influence exists under Canadian ASPE:
- Choice of equity method or cost method.
- If investee’s shares are publicly traded with a quoted price:
- Choice of equity method or fair value through profit or loss.
Significant Influence (IAS 28 §5.1)
- Power to participate in financial/operating policy decisions without control.
- Presumed when investor holds ≥ 20 % of voting shares, absent contrary evidence.
- Presence of significant influence → must apply equity method under IFRS.
Initial Measurement of Investment (IAS 28 §55.2)
- Debit Investment in Associate; Credit Cash/Payables.
- Cost includes: purchase price + directly attributable transaction costs.
Transaction Costs (55.2.1)
- Capitalized as part of the investment’s cost (contrast with FV-through-P&L securities where costs are expensed).
Acquisition Differential & Goodwill (55.2.2-55.2.4)
- Acquisition differential = difference between cost and investor’s proportionate share of book value (BV) of associate’s net assets.
\text{Acquisition price} - \left(\text{BV of associate’s net assets} \times \text{ownership \%}\right) - Two possible sources:
- Fair-value (FV) differentials: specific assets/liabilities have FV ≠ BV at acquisition.
- Goodwill: residual premium paid for expected superior future performance.
- Allocation process:
- Determine FV of all identifiable net assets (including unrecorded items like internally-generated intangibles).
- Compute FV differentials for each item: \text{FV differential}=\text{BV}-\text{FV} (assets positive, liabilities negative).
- Multiply each differential by ownership %.
- Remainder after allocating all FV differentials = goodwill (if positive) or part of bargain purchase (if negative).
- Goodwill not recorded separately; stays inside Investment in Associate carrying amount.
One-Line Consolidation Implication
- Investor’s SFP shows a single line for Investment in Associate encompassing:
- Share of associate’s BV net assets.
- Share of unamortized FV differentials.
- Goodwill (or minus bargain purchase gain already recognized).
- FV differentials create temporary differences; DIT arises and reverses with amortization.
- For simplicity, many educational examples ignore DIT; real practice must recognize per IAS 12.
Bargain Purchase (55.2.3)
- Occurs when cost < investor’s share of FV of identifiable net assets.
- Steps:
- Calculate acquisition differential after allocating FV differentials.
- If residual is negative, recognize immediate gain in P&L.
- Journal entry:
- DR Investment in Associate (to FV of net assets × %).
- CR Cash (cost paid).
- CR Gain on Purchase of Associate (profit or loss).
Illustrative Example – Archibald Corp. Buys 30 % of Kay Corp.
- Date: 1 Jan Y1.
- Consideration: \$200{,}000 cash + \$1{,}000 transaction costs.
- Kay’s BV equity: \$400{,}000.
- Only FV differential: Land (BV \$80{,}000, FV \$100{,}000).
Acquisition Differential Schedule
- Total investment cost: 200{,}000+1{,}000=\$201{,}000.
- Investor’s share of Kay BV: 400{,}000\times30\% = \$120{,}000.
- Acquisition differential: 201{,}000-120{,}000 = \$81{,}000.
- FV differential on land: (80{,}000-100{,}000) = -\$20{,}000.
- Investor’s 30 % share: -20{,}000\times30\% = -\$6{,}000 (negative because FV > BV for an asset).
- Residual goodwill: 81{,}000 - (-6{,}000) = 75{,}000.
Journal Entry at Acquisition
- DR Investment in Associate 201{,}000
- CR Cash 201{,}000
Interpretation
- Significant influence presumed (30 % ownership).
- Goodwill (75,000) embedded in the investment account.
- Land FV differential will be amortized (none if land not depreciated; if depreciable, adjust equity income accordingly).
Ethical / Practical Considerations
- Accurate identification of FV differentials & goodwill critical to prevent misstatement of future equity income.
- Bargain purchase gains require robust valuation evidence; otherwise risk of earnings manipulation.
- Decision between equity, cost, or FV methods under ASPE affects reported profit volatility and transparency.