MV

IFRS – Investments in Associates (IAS 28) – Comprehensive Study Notes

Equity Method Overview

  • Associates & joint ventures accounted for using equity method per IAS 28.
  • Initial recognition: at cost (purchase consideration + directly attributable transaction costs).
  • Subsequent carrying amount =
    • Add: investor’s share of the associate’s net income ("equity income").
    • Deduct: investor’s share of the associate’s net loss.
    • Deduct: dividends declared/received from associate.
  • Equity method nick-named “one-line consolidation” because entire interest is presented in a single Investment in Associate line item on SFP.

Equity Income Calculation – Detailed Components

  • Base share: \text{Associate\, net\, income} \times \text{Ownership\, \%}.
  • Adjust for acquisition FV differentials (amortization):
    • If FV > BV for a depreciable/amortizable asset → subtract extra depreciation to arrive at adjusted equity income.
    • If FV < BV → add difference’s amortization.
  • Realized intercompany profits/gains from prior periods: reverse previous eliminations (add back profits, subtract losses) once realized.
  • Unrealized intercompany profits/gains in current period inventory: eliminate portion still in inventory (see formula below).

Unrealized Intercompany Profits Elimination

  • Required whenever investor & associate trade with one another.
  • Eliminate at period-end: \text{Sales in ending inventory}\times\text{Gross profit \%}\times\text{Investor ownership \%}.
    • Result reduces equity income (if unrealized profit) or increases (if unrealized loss).

ASPE Differences (Section 3051)

  • When significant influence exists under Canadian ASPE:
    • Choice of equity method or cost method.
  • If investee’s shares are publicly traded with a quoted price:
    • Choice of equity method or fair value through profit or loss.

Significant Influence (IAS 28 §5.1)

  • Power to participate in financial/operating policy decisions without control.
  • Presumed when investor holds ≥ 20 % of voting shares, absent contrary evidence.
  • Presence of significant influence → must apply equity method under IFRS.

Initial Measurement of Investment (IAS 28 §55.2)

  • Debit Investment in Associate; Credit Cash/Payables.
  • Cost includes: purchase price + directly attributable transaction costs.

Transaction Costs (55.2.1)

  • Capitalized as part of the investment’s cost (contrast with FV-through-P&L securities where costs are expensed).

Acquisition Differential & Goodwill (55.2.2-55.2.4)

  • Acquisition differential = difference between cost and investor’s proportionate share of book value (BV) of associate’s net assets.
    \text{Acquisition price} - \left(\text{BV of associate’s net assets} \times \text{ownership \%}\right)
  • Two possible sources:
    1. Fair-value (FV) differentials: specific assets/liabilities have FV ≠ BV at acquisition.
    2. Goodwill: residual premium paid for expected superior future performance.
  • Allocation process:
    1. Determine FV of all identifiable net assets (including unrecorded items like internally-generated intangibles).
    2. Compute FV differentials for each item: \text{FV differential}=\text{BV}-\text{FV} (assets positive, liabilities negative).
    3. Multiply each differential by ownership %.
    4. Remainder after allocating all FV differentials = goodwill (if positive) or part of bargain purchase (if negative).
  • Goodwill not recorded separately; stays inside Investment in Associate carrying amount.

One-Line Consolidation Implication

  • Investor’s SFP shows a single line for Investment in Associate encompassing:
    • Share of associate’s BV net assets.
    • Share of unamortized FV differentials.
    • Goodwill (or minus bargain purchase gain already recognized).

Deferred Income Taxes (DIT) on FV Differentials

  • FV differentials create temporary differences; DIT arises and reverses with amortization.
  • For simplicity, many educational examples ignore DIT; real practice must recognize per IAS 12.

Bargain Purchase (55.2.3)

  • Occurs when cost < investor’s share of FV of identifiable net assets.
  • Steps:
    1. Calculate acquisition differential after allocating FV differentials.
    2. If residual is negative, recognize immediate gain in P&L.
  • Journal entry:
    • DR Investment in Associate (to FV of net assets × %).
    • CR Cash (cost paid).
    • CR Gain on Purchase of Associate (profit or loss).

Illustrative Example – Archibald Corp. Buys 30 % of Kay Corp.

  • Date: 1 Jan Y1.
  • Consideration: \$200{,}000 cash + \$1{,}000 transaction costs.
  • Kay’s BV equity: \$400{,}000.
  • Only FV differential: Land (BV \$80{,}000, FV \$100{,}000).

Acquisition Differential Schedule

  • Total investment cost: 200{,}000+1{,}000=\$201{,}000.
  • Investor’s share of Kay BV: 400{,}000\times30\% = \$120{,}000.
  • Acquisition differential: 201{,}000-120{,}000 = \$81{,}000.
  • FV differential on land: (80{,}000-100{,}000) = -\$20{,}000.
    • Investor’s 30 % share: -20{,}000\times30\% = -\$6{,}000 (negative because FV > BV for an asset).
  • Residual goodwill: 81{,}000 - (-6{,}000) = 75{,}000.

Journal Entry at Acquisition

  • DR Investment in Associate 201{,}000
  • CR Cash 201{,}000

Interpretation

  • Significant influence presumed (30 % ownership).
  • Goodwill (75,000) embedded in the investment account.
  • Land FV differential will be amortized (none if land not depreciated; if depreciable, adjust equity income accordingly).

Ethical / Practical Considerations

  • Accurate identification of FV differentials & goodwill critical to prevent misstatement of future equity income.
  • Bargain purchase gains require robust valuation evidence; otherwise risk of earnings manipulation.
  • Decision between equity, cost, or FV methods under ASPE affects reported profit volatility and transparency.