Notes on Generations and Collective Memory in Civil Rights
Overview of Generational Memory and Civil Rights
Generational Identity (Mannheim's Theory): Research shows that age significantly affects memory of important national events.
Study by Schuman and Scott (1989) validated Mannheim's theory using a national sample of Americans.
Civil Rights movement recall did not show expected age patterns among whites, hypothesized that this was due to regional differences.
Key Hypotheses
Regional Impact on Memory: Southern whites who were mature teenagers or young adults during the Civil Rights movement will recall it more than their peers from other regions.
Hypothesis 1: Southern whites from this cohort will have a greater memory of Civil Rights.
Hypothesis 2: This cohort will attribute more historical significance to the Civil Rights movement compared to other groups.
Collective Memory and Its Features
Three Premises of Collective Memory:
The past persists and influences the present and the future.
Memory is shaped by social contexts, making it intersubjective.
Collective memories play a role in shaping identities and defining grievances.
Memory as a Social Phenomenon: Elaboration on how collective memories can validate identities and contribute to narratives within communities.
Research Methodology
Schuman and Scott’s 1985 study utilized open-ended questions to assess spontaneous recollections of key events among Americans.
Data used from 1993 General Social Survey (GSS) helps to explore reinforcing patterns of recollection among different cohorts and regions.
Notable Findings
Southern whites aged 42-64 in 1993 recalled the Civil Rights movement frequently compared to their peers in other regions:
17.7% mentioned it compared to lower percentages from non-Southern regions.
Among African Americans, 54% recalled the Civil Rights movement, while only about 6% of whites did.
The Civil Rights movement looms large in Southern memory, creating a collective memory distinct from other regions.
Statistical Analysis: Logistical regression confirms significant differences in Civil Rights memory relating to region and cohort, adjusting for educational background and gender.
Findings consistently indicate that age and region significantly influence how collective memories are formed and maintained.
Conclusions Drawn
Significance of Place: The Civil Rights movement's location in the South means that it has a different living legacy than similar movements in other regions, affecting its recall and significance.
Future Research: Further examination needed into how collective memories shape present-day racial attitudes and how they are institutionalized within public consciousness.
Potential Areas of Influence: Explore the role of collective memory in political and social conditions today, shaping identity and social action.